• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

The $10 Billion Edujobs bill...

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
.. was signed into law on August 10 and will save the jobs of 160,000 educators.

It’s almost impossible to estimate how many teachers have been laid off so far around the country but experts put the number somewhere between 100,000 and 300,000. U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan has said the new legislation would protect 161,000 jobs.


Bureau of Labor Statistics released its monthly report on America’s employment situation. Table B-1 disaggregates the statistics by sector

http://bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t17.htm

The vast majority of educators fall into the “Local Government – Education” category. The nearly 8 million employees in this category include superintendents, managers, principals, specialists and other workers not covered by the edujobs bill. Nevertheless, the total workforce in August 2010 consisted of 56,500 fewer employees than it did in August 2009. That’s a reduction of 0.7 percent, which isn’t much worse than the reduction in enrollment. It also fits quite nicely with NEA’s estimate of membership loss, pre-edujobs.


Yesterday, the Argus-Leader reported that the bill may cost some South Dakota school districts money, and the San Bernardino Sun listed the local California districts that are saving the edujobs money for next year, mainly because they didn’t lay off many (or any) teachers this year. This morning, the Columbus Post Dispatch noted that the Ohio district was doing the same thing (96 of pink-slipped 113 teachers had already been rehired).


Don’t forget: the House was recalled to special session to vote on the bill because it was supposed to require immediate action. The people who surrendered their food stamp increases will be happy to know the money is sitting in school district bank accounts, earning interest.


http://hotair.com/archives/2010/09/12/edujobs-insult-to-injury/
 

Steve

Well-known member
it is good that some districts are saving the money... and that a few are even investing that same money...

there is nothing wrong with being responsible with taxpayer dollars...

as for the other cash strapped districts.. hopefully they will "learn" and improve..
 

Tam

Well-known member
When they run out of this money will they call another special session to pass another $10 billion to save these same jobs again?
 
Top