• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

The 10 Leading Theories For Dead Birds And Fish

A

Anonymous

Guest
http://www.activistpost.com/2011/01/10-leading-theories-for-dead-birds-and.html

As the mainstream media attempts to downplay the latest die-off event, which has now gone global, it is worthwhile to keep track of the story lines. Feel free to add your own to the comments section, and we will update accordingly.

Mainstream Explanations: Lightning, hail, mid-air collision, power lines, and New Year fireworks for the birds . . . but disease for the fish. This is even rolling eyes in the mainstream media. Birds are incredibly sensitive to their environment (think Canary in the coal mine), and the thought that they were caught by surprise, or that they "fowled" up their flight pattern is patently ridiculous. And where are the roasted birds from this lightning strike? And what about fish dying in the same region? Just a "disease" coincidence. One mainstream headline has to be enshrined as the saddest attempt at sensationalism, while revealing an obvious natural conclusion Falling Birds Likely Died From Massive Trauma. Really?

Meteor showers: We are in a period of intense seasonal meteor showers, and several perennial YouTubers reported hearing sonic booms in the area that could have indicated a local shock wave. This would be one non-conspiratorial, natural cause that actually makes sense, but it is hard to connect to both birds and fish, unless it produced a disabling frequency. There were indeed other sound anomalies according to the report highlighted above.

New Madrid Fault Line: An excellent article by The American Dream collated data about the recent earthquake activity along this fault line that runs along the mid-eastern section of the U.S. Combined with gas fracking, the immense geological activity in the region, and the BP oil drilling disaster, which off-gassed the dispersant, Corexit, into the atmosphere, and we should be wondering about any mass deaths in the region. Nevertheless, this has turned into a global event, so the above could be a side effect of something larger, or a direct contributing factor.

Government testing: The long history of government testing has been exposed by many researchers. The strange component to this die-off is that only certain species have been affected, but within the entire region. And some reports have indicated that the organs of these birds were liquefied, which could indicate a possible virus. Could this implicate species-specific bio-weapons? It is on record that discussions have taken place about race-specific bio-weapons; perhaps this is a test of delivery capability?

GMO mutation: Mike Adams of Natural News sets forth an interesting theory: this latest event is local, but the die-offs are happening across species as bee populations and bats are also declining. Adams points out that Monsanto has a corporate office in Arkansas. Just wondering.

Geoengineering: Could spraying in the area have caused this type of fallout? Perhaps something new added to the mixture? Chemtrails have quickly moved from conspiracy theory to documented fact. So much so, that the powers-that-be have had to admit to the program, but a beneficial one in their view. Between cloud seeding and possible connections to HAARP, chemtrail fallout must be considered, especially as it is being conducted nearly worldwide. Rosalind Peterson has been at the forefront of connecting geoengineering to GMOs as a combined source for oxygen-depleting algae blooms that very well could affect a wide spectrum of natural systems. Furthermore, some believe that the delivery system for chemtrails can also disperse pathogens. If there is a flu or disease outbreak in the coming days or weeks among the human population in areas where the birds have fallen, the chemtrail connection could be made. If this happens, the contagion could be blamed on a new, deadly bird flu. A last possibility connected to chemtrails would be nanoparticles.

HAARP: Birds and fish can be susceptible to subtle frequency alteration. An interesting YouTube post from a long-time fisherman mentioned the "pearl" plate behind the eye of the affected type of drum fish in this event. He made a plea for anyone in the area to look for signs of damage to this plate. Both birds and fish navigate in highly coordinated ways that indicate that they move and communicate via frequencies. Could the HAARP array in Alaska have short-circuited their navigation systems? Or, perhaps this is the beginning of a cascading effect from decades of electromagnetic pollution emanating from EMF and ELF waves shot around the planet via a wide range of modern communications.

Scalar Weapons: These directed energy beam weapons can be deployed via satellite and create a wide range of "natural disasters" that can be tuned to certain frequencies. Their radius is reported to be several miles. Even crazier is that we have been told that the dead birds encountered massive trauma. One of the reported abilities of scalar weapons is to create a Tesla shield of plasma, like a bubble, that could explode anything that enters its airspace. Some have speculated that this technology is in full operation. But what if it truly is still at the testing phase? Remember, this is happening in South America, too.

Project Blue Beam: Were they testing a sound generator for the global theater of alien invasion? This one is "out there" for sure, but NASA itself has announced its preparation for such a scenario. Project Blue Beam, like its counterpart HAARP, uses the natural energy present in the ionosphere as both a visual and acoustical device. Again, perhaps they are not at the ready stage yet, but, like Tesla, have made an unintentional misstep.

Geomagnetic and other Earth changes: As anyone can see from the above range of possibilities, we are facing an array of human tampering. However, the backdrop to this are the anomalies beginning to take form with the apparent wandering of our magnetic pole, as even National Geographic reported that the north magnetic pole is racing toward Russia. Add to this a dwindling magnetosphere and falling oxygen levels, and the deaths among more delicate species might portend a larger problem. Finally, an increase in sun activity and magnetic storms might be weakening our overall natural habitat.

The widespread die-off of nature should lead us to look more intently at the world around us, and to question our relationship to it, and our effect upon it. Perhaps this is what we should have been doing all along.
 

hopalong

Well-known member
What is your explanation for the same thing happening in Sweden, Brazil, New Zealand,
What about the instances in 1976 and 1980???????
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
shaumei said:
Still do not believe in Chemtrailing/Aerosol Poisoning by Military? Explain this to yourself...

http://www.necn.com/01/03/11/Officials-investigate-dead-fish-birds-in/landing_nation.html?blockID=383839&feedID=4207



EvilPenguin.gif



icon_lmao.gif
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hopalong said:
What is your explanation for the same thing happening in Sweden, Brazil, New Zealand,
What about the instances in 1976 and 1980???????
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

have no idea and do not care...i care about what is happening here now.
 

hopalong

Well-known member
shaumei said:
hopalong said:
What is your explanation for the same thing happening in Sweden, Brazil, New Zealand,
What about the instances in 1976 and 1980???????
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

have no idea and do not care...i care about what is happening here now.

Figures!!!! can't explain it then sure cant explain it now???
Incidemntly SWEDEN, BRAZIL, and NEW ZEALAND are current events!!!!!
Talk about being tunnel vision,
If it suits you.can use the past to make a point, when it doesn't suit you it is of no consequence :roll: :roll:
Kinda like you of no consequence
 

Steve

Well-known member
shaumei said:
hopalong said:
What is your explanation for the same thing happening in Sweden, Brazil, New Zealand,
What about the instances in 1976 and 1980???????
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

have no idea and do not care...i care about what is happening here now.

this is amazing.. I just posted the below quote on another thread.. seconds ago..

Steve said:
shaumei said:
chemtrails should be the one reason investigated on why the birds fell from the sky and killed the fish. the die off is now worldwide.

with your "theory" we would have to look at all the facts, and throw out any that do not lead us to your agenda/theory..

I thought that type of science went out in the dark ages?
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Steve said:
shaumei said:
hopalong said:
What is your explanation for the same thing happening in Sweden, Brazil, New Zealand,
What about the instances in 1976 and 1980???????
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

have no idea and do not care...i care about what is happening here now.

this is amazing.. I just posted the below quote on another thread.. seconds ago..

Steve said:
shaumei said:
chemtrails should be the one reason investigated on why the birds fell from the sky and killed the fish. the die off is now worldwide.

with your "theory" we would have to look at all the facts, and throw out any that do not lead us to your agenda/theory..

I thought that type of science went out in the dark ages?



but don't forget Steve, we are the morons.


icon_lmao.gif
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Steve said:
shaumei said:
hopalong said:
What is your explanation for the same thing happening in Sweden, Brazil, New Zealand,
What about the instances in 1976 and 1980???????
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

have no idea and do not care...i care about what is happening here now.

this is amazing.. I just posted the below quote on another thread.. seconds ago..

Steve said:
shaumei said:
chemtrails should be the one reason investigated on why the birds fell from the sky and killed the fish. the die off is now worldwide.

with your "theory" we would have to look at all the facts, and throw out any that do not lead us to your agenda/theory..

I thought that type of science went out in the dark ages?

if there is a relationship between the two die offs, I am all for knowing what they are...I am concerned what is happening now. there was also a time when the dinosaurs died as well...does it relate to the birds and fish now? I do not know...but, do not just ask me questions, bring some thoughts to the table...theories...
 

Tam

Well-known member
shaumei said:
Steve said:
shaumei said:
have no idea and do not care...i care about what is happening here now.

this is amazing.. I just posted the below quote on another thread.. seconds ago..

Steve said:
with your "theory" we would have to look at all the facts, and throw out any that do not lead us to your agenda/theory..

I thought that type of science went out in the dark ages?

if there is a relationship between the two die offs, I am all for knowing what they are...I am concerned what is happening now. there was also a time when the dinosaurs died as well...does it relate to the birds and fish now? I do not know...but, do not just ask me questions, bring some thoughts to the table...theories...

BRING SOMETHING TO THE TABLE :shock: Why bother? You have proven more than a few times that if the facts brought don't support your conspiracy then the person that brought said facts is nothing more than a moron to you. If you really want to know who the moron is LOOK IN THE MIRROR. :roll:
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Tam said:
shaumei said:
Steve said:
this is amazing.. I just posted the below quote on another thread.. seconds ago..

if there is a relationship between the two die offs, I am all for knowing what they are...I am concerned what is happening now. there was also a time when the dinosaurs died as well...does it relate to the birds and fish now? I do not know...but, do not just ask me questions, bring some thoughts to the table...theories...

BRING SOMETHING TO THE TABLE :shock: Why bother? You have proven more than a few times that if the facts brought don't support your conspiracy then the person that brought said facts is nothing more than a moron to you. If you really want to know who the moron is LOOK IN THE MIRROR. :roll:

Bingo! How many times has Shamu said WTC 7 fell at freefall speed and in its own footprint? Show the man something to the contrary and he just ignores it, waits a while, and then repeats the same BS. So yes, after a while Shamu, the rest of us just say "why bother?".
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
shaumei said:
Steve said:
shaumei said:
have no idea and do not care...i care about what is happening here now.

this is amazing.. I just posted the below quote on another thread.. seconds ago..

Steve said:
with your "theory" we would have to look at all the facts, and throw out any that do not lead us to your agenda/theory..

I thought that type of science went out in the dark ages?

if there is a relationship between the two die offs, I am all for knowing what they are...I am concerned what is happening now. there was also a time when the dinosaurs died as well...does it relate to the birds and fish now? I do not know...but, do not just ask me questions, bring some thoughts to the table...theories...

do you even read others' posts. I have already posted a possible connection between the 2, maybe even 2 or 3 connections.

Do you know how to use google?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Whitewing said:
Tam said:
shaumei said:
if there is a relationship between the two die offs, I am all for knowing what they are...I am concerned what is happening now. there was also a time when the dinosaurs died as well...does it relate to the birds and fish now? I do not know...but, do not just ask me questions, bring some thoughts to the table...theories...

BRING SOMETHING TO THE TABLE :shock: Why bother? You have proven more than a few times that if the facts brought don't support your conspiracy then the person that brought said facts is nothing more than a moron to you. If you really want to know who the moron is LOOK IN THE MIRROR. :roll:

Bingo! How many times has Shamu said WTC 7 fell at freefall speed and in its own footprint? Show the man something to the contrary and he just ignores it, waits a while, and then repeats the same BS. So yes, after a while Shamu, the rest of us just say "why bother?".

whitewing,

you crack me up hanging on to your false reality as hard as you can...you somehow turn a 7 second freefall into something that happened over hours all day long...lol..whatever allows you to sleep....
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
shaumei said:
Whitewing said:
Tam said:
BRING SOMETHING TO THE TABLE :shock: Why bother? You have proven more than a few times that if the facts brought don't support your conspiracy then the person that brought said facts is nothing more than a moron to you. If you really want to know who the moron is LOOK IN THE MIRROR. :roll:

Bingo! How many times has Shamu said WTC 7 fell at freefall speed and in its own footprint? Show the man something to the contrary and he just ignores it, waits a while, and then repeats the same BS. So yes, after a while Shamu, the rest of us just say "why bother?".

whitewing,

you crack me up hanging on to your false reality as hard as you can...you somehow turn a 7 second freefall into something that happened over hours all day long...lol..whatever allows you to sleep....

Even you, in an odd instant of objectivity, finally admitted that the building fell in stages, Shamu.

As for the "fell in its own footprint" lie you keep repeating, I've never seen you once comment on the photographic evidence that clearly shows it did not fall in its own footprint. Debris from WTC 7 can clearly be seen ON TOP OF OTHER BUILDINGS AND SCATTERED ACROSS THE ROAD TO THE SOUTH (if I recall my directions correctly). How does debris from WTC 7 end up on top of other buildings if it fell in its own footprint Shamu? The answer is simple, it didn't. It leaned before it fell. I know it, you know it, and the people on the ground that day knew it when they issued warnings that the building was doomed to collapse.

You're a loon Shamu and you're also dishonest to keep cherry picking tiny bits of data that you believe fit your conspiracy theories while ignoring mountains of evidence to the contrary.
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Rebut this you weasel:

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

Below are snapshots from a video taken from the northeast of Building 7 just as it collapses. Note that it has just begun to collapse and it is already tilting to the south.

wtc7f1.jpg


Half way through and it's still tilted to the south. Note the west side of the building has come away from the west face around what used to be the 43rd floor. Light can be seen through the east face windows.

wtc7f2.jpg


Note the angle to the south has increased and so has the space between the west face and the rest of the building. The west face later lays on the Verizon building to the west. While it looks like it's about to hit the ground, it's still almost as high as the white building to the right. That makes it about 20 stories.

wtc7f3.jpg


Now here below is a shot for Shaum to explain. Tell us Engineer Shamu how WTC7 fell in its own footprint.

b7debris.jpg


To put it simply, the building DID fall over backward and to the south-east. Just not like a steel reinforced concrete building would. Another telling photo is this one taken closer to the event date.

barclay.jpg


Above is another photo from over Building 7. The white building is on the left. Note the debris from building 7 which crossed the street and landed on top of the white building.

Kinda tough isn't it Shamu for a building that fell in its own footprint to cross the street and fall on top of another building. Shoddy demolition I suspect will be your comeback.

Now, if you've got evidence of "obvious demolition" other than a 7 second video showing the upper floors of WTC7 as the collapse began, post it. Otherwise, STFU about it, you loon.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
the building fell in 7 seconds...

was not hit by any plane...


NIST admitted freefall speed.

the only way freefall speed can be achieved is by removing all resistance.

how did all resistance get removed?
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
shaumei said:
the building fell in 7 seconds...

was not hit by any plane...


NIST admitted freefall speed.

the only way freefall speed can be achieved is by removing all resistance.

how did all resistance get removed?

WRONG! The building did not fall in 7 seconds. It fell in something like 18 or 19 seconds. It was not hit by a plane but was severely damaged by debris falling from one of the Twin Towers. NIST admitted freefall DURING A PART OF COLLAPSE SEQUENCE.

"But the building doesn't look like it fell over, it fell "in its own foot print" you might say. That's because it is impossible for a 47 story steel building to fall over like that. It's not a small steel reinforced concrete building like the ones shown as *Examples* of buildings which fell over. Building 7 is more like the towers, made up of many pieces put together. It's not so much a solid block as those steel reinforced concrete buildings.

This evidence supports the NIST contention that the building collapse progressed from the penthouse out as columns were weakened by the fires. The slow sinking of the penthouses, indicating the internal collapse of the building behind the visible north wall, took 8.2 seconds according to a NIST preliminary report. Seismograph trace of the collapse of WTC 7 indicates that parts of the building were hitting the ground for 18 seconds. This means the collapse took at least 18 seconds, of which only the last approximately 15 seconds are visible in videos: 8 seconds for the penthouses and 7 seconds for the north wall to come down.


How did all resistance get removed? I'm no engineer but I suspect that because the building was severely damaged, was on fire, and was leaning that as it began to collapse, all support below gave way, hence a part of the collapse sequence exhibited free fall speed.

I've shown you all sorts of evidence that the building leaned, fell to the side as it collapsed, (there's also video of it taking almost 20 seconds to complete the collapse). What have you shown me to support your conspiracy that it was brought down via planted explosives? A single angle video of 7 seconds taken from a distance. To me, that represents ZILCH, NADA, ZERO, GOOSE EGG. Show me some evidence that it was brought down via demolition Shamu......especially now that you've abandonded the "fell it its footprint" bullcrap.

And yet you claim I'm the one clinging to false reality. :lol:
 

hopalong

Well-known member
South tower fell in 15.28 seconds
N orth tower fell in 22.02

Far cry from the 7 seconds you claim shame full!!!
When I did the calculations, what I got for a thousand feet was about nine seconds- let's see,
d = 1/2at^2
so
t = (2d/a)^1/2
a is 9.8m/s^2 (acceleration of gravity at Earth's surface, according to Wikipedia), [He gives this reference so you can double check him.]
d is 417m (height of the World Trade Center towers, same source)
so
t = (834m/9.8m/s^2)^1/2 = 9.23s
OK, so how fast was it going? Easy enough,
v = at
v = (9.8m/s^2 x 9.23s) = 90.4m/s
So in the following second, it would have fallen about another hundred meters. That's almost a quarter of the height it already fell. And we haven't even made it to eleven seconds yet; it could have fallen more than twice its height in that additional four seconds. If the top fell freely, in 13.23 seconds it would have fallen about two and one-half times as far as it actually did fall in that time. So the collapse was at much less than free-fall rates.
this info was from a blogger not named
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
You are going to hang on to your matrix as long as you can but the video does not support your fantasy. It was a steel building. How many in the past have fallen down due to isolated office fires in the past? Zero

There was a countdown heard by many bystanders as well. We have these people on video. Easy to call them in. You have witness testimony that bombs were going off in the building. You have witness testimony that bodies were in the main floor lying everywhere. The fires were not hot enough to stop people from going from the top floor to the bottom floor. Certainly not hot enough to melt steel.

What does the video show each of you?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEPjOi2dQSM
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Wow, what a stunning video Shamu. A video of another building burning used as some sort of proof that WTC7 didn't collapse on its own. Really compelling. I love your standards of evidence.
 
Top