• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

the definition of Rape

Tam

Well-known member
The Dems are trying to tag Ryan to Akin over the fact they co-signed a bill that forbid Government funding of Abortions which doesn't exclude rape.

Now the Dems are claiming RAPE IS RAPE and the Republicans are punishing those women who are raped. BUT is all rape the same NO it's not.
When you have a Violent/ Forcible Rape that is one thing but when you have a 19 year old get his 15 year old UNDERAGED sexually active girlfriend pregnant that is quite another thing, and in legal terms that is still RAPE. STATUTORY RAPE

So should US tax Payers pay for an abortion due to statutory rape or should the parents of the sexually active CHILD be held responsible for their daughter's behavior?

Not all rape is forced like the Dems would have one believe so I agree the Government should not have to pay for all abortions due to rape. VIOLENT RAPES YES STATUTORY RAPE NO.

I think AKIN was totally wrong with his stupid comment and should step down but that does not change the fact Dems are using a VERY WIDE BRUSH to make Romney, Ryan and the rest of the Republicans look like they stand with Akin and HIS STUPID COMMENTS.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Tam said:
The Dems are trying to tag Ryan to Akin over the fact they co-signed a bill that forbid Government funding of Abortions which doesn't exclude rape.

Now the Dems are claiming RAPE IS RAPE and the Republicans are punishing those women who are raped. BUT is all rape the same NO it's not.
When you have a Violent/ Forcible Rape that is one thing but when you have a 19 year old get his 15 year old UNDERAGED sexually active girlfriend pregnant that is quite another thing, and in legal terms that is still RAPE. STATUTORY RAPE

So should US tax Payers pay for an abortion due to statutory rape or should the parents of the sexually active CHILD be held responsible for their daughter's behavior?

Not all rape is forced like the Dems would have one believe so I agree the Government should not have to pay for all abortions due to rape. VIOLENT RAPES YES STATUTORY RAPE NO.

I think AKIN was totally wrong with his stupid comment and should step down but that does not change the fact Dems are using a VERY WIDE BRUSH to make Romney, Ryan and the rest of the Republicans look like they stand with Akin and HIS STUPID COMMENTS.

My God Tam- what an insult to women- and especially rape victims you are... How much force should a women put up to say no - or resist? Are you one of those that believe they should die before being raped? What is your definition of resistance... I'd love to have you tell some of the victims I've worked with that they didn't resist enough :roll:

I only wish you had to ever work with women who had been raped....Or the raped children...

Real life true situation-- a smalltown minister was having his wife "marry" him to his daughters as soon as they reached puberty (usually around 12-13)- and then having sex with them...When his oldest became pregnant she related the whole thing to a friend- and along with her testimony and sisters- Daddy took a long trip to prison.... Sadly Momma got a suspended sentence because she was just one of those rightwingernut bible thumper wives that thought they had to do anything their husband told them...

Should this 16 year old girl- the victim of rape and incest be allowed to get an abortion-- or should she be penalized all her life for her wingnut Bible thumper father ?
 

Tam

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Tam said:
The Dems are trying to tag Ryan to Akin over the fact they co-signed a bill that forbid Government funding of Abortions which doesn't exclude rape.

Now the Dems are claiming RAPE IS RAPE and the Republicans are punishing those women who are raped. BUT is all rape the same NO it's not.
When you have a Violent/ Forcible Rape that is one thing but when you have a 19 year old get his 15 year old UNDERAGED sexually active girlfriend pregnant that is quite another thing, and in legal terms that is still RAPE. STATUTORY RAPE

So should US tax Payers pay for an abortion due to statutory rape or should the parents of the sexually active CHILD be held responsible for their daughter's behavior?

Not all rape is forced like the Dems would have one believe so I agree the Government should not have to pay for all abortions due to rape. VIOLENT RAPES YES STATUTORY RAPE NO.

I think AKIN was totally wrong with his stupid comment and should step down but that does not change the fact Dems are using a VERY WIDE BRUSH to make Romney, Ryan and the rest of the Republicans look like they stand with Akin and HIS STUPID COMMENTS.

My God Tam- what an insult to women- and especially rape victims you are... How much force should a women put up to say no - or resist? Are you one of those that believe they should die before being raped? What is your definition of resistance... I'd love to have you tell some of the victims I've worked with that they didn't resist enough :roll:

I only wish you had to ever work with women who had been raped....Or the raped children...

Real life true situation-- a smalltown minister was having his wife "marry" him to his daughters as soon as they reached puberty (usually around 12-13)- and then having sex with them...When his oldest became pregnant she related the whole thing to a friend- and along with her testimony and sisters- Daddy took a long trip to prison.... Sadly Momma got a suspended sentence because she was just one of those rightwingernut bible thumper wives that thought they had to do anything their husband told them...

Should this 16 year old girl- the victim of rape and incest be allowed to get an abortion-- or should she be penalized all her life for her wingnut Bible thumper father ?

You are one sick piece of crap I NEVER SAID ANY THING ABOUT VIOLENT RAPE NOT BEING HORRIBLE I said there is a sexual act that is considered Rape in the legal definition that is far from VIOLENT.

It is the act of a 19 plus year old taking a under the age of consent girl to bed and making love to her. If she was forced to have sex with the over aged guy then that would be FORCIBLE VIOLENT RAPE and a VERY HUGH UGLY CRIME. BUT if she went to bed think the guy loved her and found out after he got her pregnant that he was a LOW LIFE just wanting to get in her pants then she should not have the right to get an abortion on the tax payer tab as she took it upon HERSELF TO GO TO BED WITH THAT LOW LIFE.

You can be a complete Scumbag but don't put your sick Democrat spin on what I was saying. :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Tam said:
Oldtimer said:
Tam said:
The Dems are trying to tag Ryan to Akin over the fact they co-signed a bill that forbid Government funding of Abortions which doesn't exclude rape.

Now the Dems are claiming RAPE IS RAPE and the Republicans are punishing those women who are raped. BUT is all rape the same NO it's not.
When you have a Violent/ Forcible Rape that is one thing but when you have a 19 year old get his 15 year old UNDERAGED sexually active girlfriend pregnant that is quite another thing, and in legal terms that is still RAPE. STATUTORY RAPE

So should US tax Payers pay for an abortion due to statutory rape or should the parents of the sexually active CHILD be held responsible for their daughter's behavior?

Not all rape is forced like the Dems would have one believe so I agree the Government should not have to pay for all abortions due to rape. VIOLENT RAPES YES STATUTORY RAPE NO.

I think AKIN was totally wrong with his stupid comment and should step down but that does not change the fact Dems are using a VERY WIDE BRUSH to make Romney, Ryan and the rest of the Republicans look like they stand with Akin and HIS STUPID COMMENTS.

My God Tam- what an insult to women- and especially rape victims you are... How much force should a women put up to say no - or resist? Are you one of those that believe they should die before being raped? What is your definition of resistance... I'd love to have you tell some of the victims I've worked with that they didn't resist enough :roll:

I only wish you had to ever work with women who had been raped....Or the raped children...

Real life true situation-- a smalltown minister was having his wife "marry" him to his daughters as soon as they reached puberty (usually around 12-13)- and then having sex with them...When his oldest became pregnant she related the whole thing to a friend- and along with her testimony and sisters- Daddy took a long trip to prison.... Sadly Momma got a suspended sentence because she was just one of those rightwingernut bible thumper wives that thought they had to do anything their husband told them...

Should this 16 year old girl- the victim of rape and incest be allowed to get an abortion-- or should she be penalized all her life for her wingnut Bible thumper father ?

You are one sick piece of crap I NEVER SAID ANY THING ABOUT VIOLENT RAPE NOT BEING HORRIBLE I said there is a sexual act that is considered Rape in the legal definition that is far from VIOLENT.

It is the act of a 19 plus year old taking a under the age of consent girl to bed and making love to her. If she was forced to have sex with the over aged guy then that would be FORCIBLE VIOLENT RAPE and a VERY HUGH UGLY CRIME. BUT if she went to bed think the guy loved her and found out after he got her pregnant that he was a LOW LIFE just wanting to get in her pants then she should not have the right to get an abortion on the tax payer tab as she took it upon HERSELF TO GO TO BED WITH THAT LOW LIFE.

You can be a complete Scumbag but don't put your sick Democrat spin on what I was saying. :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

Sorry Tam- if the real world doesn't fit under the world you see thru your Rose colored glasses..
 

Tam

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Tam said:
Oldtimer said:
My God Tam- what an insult to women- and especially rape victims you are... How much force should a women put up to say no - or resist? Are you one of those that believe they should die before being raped? What is your definition of resistance... I'd love to have you tell some of the victims I've worked with that they didn't resist enough :roll:

I only wish you had to ever work with women who had been raped....Or the raped children...

Real life true situation-- a smalltown minister was having his wife "marry" him to his daughters as soon as they reached puberty (usually around 12-13)- and then having sex with them...When his oldest became pregnant she related the whole thing to a friend- and along with her testimony and sisters- Daddy took a long trip to prison.... Sadly Momma got a suspended sentence because she was just one of those rightwingernut bible thumper wives that thought they had to do anything their husband told them...

Should this 16 year old girl- the victim of rape and incest be allowed to get an abortion-- or should she be penalized all her life for her wingnut Bible thumper father ?

You are one sick piece of crap I NEVER SAID ANY THING ABOUT VIOLENT RAPE NOT BEING HORRIBLE I said there is a sexual act that is considered Rape in the legal definition that is far from VIOLENT.

It is the act of a 19 plus year old taking a under the age of consent girl to bed and making love to her. If she was forced to have sex with the over aged guy then that would be FORCIBLE VIOLENT RAPE and a VERY HUGH UGLY CRIME. BUT if she went to bed think the guy loved her and found out after he got her pregnant that he was a LOW LIFE just wanting to get in her pants then she should not have the right to get an abortion on the tax payer tab as she took it upon HERSELF TO GO TO BED WITH THAT LOW LIFE.

You can be a complete Scumbag but don't put your sick Democrat spin on what I was saying. :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

Sorry Tam- if the real world doesn't fit under the world you see thru your Rose colored glasses..

This has nothing to do with the color of my glasses, it has to do with you looking at your computer through the bottom of a empty whiskey bottle as USUAL. You put words into my mouth I did not say and in doing so you proved what a sick pig you are. So do me a favor toss the bottle in the recycling and sleep it off before making another disgusting post. :mad: :mad:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Real life true situation-- a smalltown minister was having his wife "marry" him to his daughters as soon as they reached puberty (usually around 12-13)- and then having sex with them...When his oldest became pregnant she related the whole thing to a friend- and along with her testimony and sisters- Daddy took a long trip to prison.... Sadly Momma got a suspended sentence because she was just one of those rightwingernut bible thumper wives that thought they had to do anything their husband told them...

Should this 16 year old girl- the victim of rape and incest be allowed to get an abortion-- or should she be penalized all her life for her wingnut Bible thumper father ?

Tam I take it you don't want to answer my question to this real life situation that took place within 100 miles of where you lived :???:
 

Tam

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Real life true situation-- a smalltown minister was having his wife "marry" him to his daughters as soon as they reached puberty (usually around 12-13)- and then having sex with them...When his oldest became pregnant she related the whole thing to a friend- and along with her testimony and sisters- Daddy took a long trip to prison.... Sadly Momma got a suspended sentence because she was just one of those rightwingernut bible thumper wives that thought they had to do anything their husband told them...

Should this 16 year old girl- the victim of rape and incest be allowed to get an abortion-- or should she be penalized all her life for her wingnut Bible thumper father ?

Tam I take it you don't want to answer my question to this real life situation that took place within 100 miles of where you lived :???:

I missed your question hidden within the disgusting lieing post you made.

I like most people do support abortions if it is forced rape, incest or the mothers health is seriously in danger. I just don't believe abortion should be used as a form of birth control for those to lazy to protect themselves from their voluntary actions. It they want to play in their bedrooms then they should expect to PAY for the plessure of doing so. They should not expect the tax payers to pick up the tab. And guess what Oldtimer I'm in line with the Republican platform on that.


Top Republican: GOP platform doesn't bar rape, incest exemptions on abortion
By Cameron Joseph - 08/22/12 12:35 PM ET

A day after Democrats blasted the Republican Party's official party platform on abortion as the "Akin plank," the author of the party's position on abortion is pushing back by arguing that the party doesn't say whether or not exemptions for rape and incest should be allowed in its push for a ban.


"The Republican Party plank endorsing a Human Life Amendment does not take a position on which version of a Human Life Amendment should eventually be adopted," James Bopp, the co-chairman of the party platform's Subcommittee on Restoring Constitutional Government, emailed to The Hill. "We leave that decision to Congress and the people of the United States at that time. Thus, we do not take a position on which exceptions should be included in a Human Life Amendment."

As I see it the Republican party PLATFORM, that you have been slobbering in your booze and peeing down your leg about, has not officially stated they support a ban on abortion exemptions. they are leaving that up to the ELECTED CONGRESS to decide. :roll:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
I wonder how many rapes are twarted by women having the right to carry?

Meanwhile OT wants to take that right to defend oneself away....

Hypocrit dreaming and lying again.. I have never opposed concealed carry - in fact when I was in office I authorized more concealed weapons permits than had ever been given out in the entire county before...

Too bad you continue to shoot from the hip with your made up stories without checking the facts! :(
 

Mike

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
I wonder how many rapes are twarted by women having the right to carry?

Meanwhile OT wants to take that right to defend oneself away....

Hypocrit dreaming and lying again.. I have never opposed concealed carry - in fact when I was in office I authorized more concealed weapons permits than had ever been given out in the entire county before...

Too bad you continue to shoot from the hip with your made up stories without checking the facts! :(
You have defended gun laws in general and even defended the taking up of guns for all citizens using some of the old "Wild West" incidents as precedence.

No, you are for "concealed carry" for those you personally approve to carry. So therefore you have opposed concealed carry for certain citizens. For many, that is NOT a "Constitutional" stance.

Now who is dreaming and lying? :lol: :lol:

The more you post, the more you dig yourself into a credibility hole. :roll:
 

TexasBred

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Tam said:
The Dems are trying to tag Ryan to Akin over the fact they co-signed a bill that forbid Government funding of Abortions which doesn't exclude rape.

Now the Dems are claiming RAPE IS RAPE and the Republicans are punishing those women who are raped. BUT is all rape the same NO it's not.
When you have a Violent/ Forcible Rape that is one thing but when you have a 19 year old get his 15 year old UNDERAGED sexually active girlfriend pregnant that is quite another thing, and in legal terms that is still RAPE. STATUTORY RAPE

So should US tax Payers pay for an abortion due to statutory rape or should the parents of the sexually active CHILD be held responsible for their daughter's behavior?

Not all rape is forced like the Dems would have one believe so I agree the Government should not have to pay for all abortions due to rape. VIOLENT RAPES YES STATUTORY RAPE NO.

I think AKIN was totally wrong with his stupid comment and should step down but that does not change the fact Dems are using a VERY WIDE BRUSH to make Romney, Ryan and the rest of the Republicans look like they stand with Akin and HIS STUPID COMMENTS.

My God Tam- what an insult to women- and especially rape victims you are... How much force should a women put up to say no - or resist? Are you one of those that believe they should die before being raped? What is your definition of resistance... I'd love to have you tell some of the victims I've worked with that they didn't resist enough :roll:

I only wish you had to ever work with women who had been raped....Or the raped children...

Real life true situation-- a smalltown minister was having his wife "marry" him to his daughters as soon as they reached puberty (usually around 12-13)- and then having sex with them...When his oldest became pregnant she related the whole thing to a friend- and along with her testimony and sisters- Daddy took a long trip to prison.... Sadly Momma got a suspended sentence because she was just one of those rightwingernut bible thumper wives that thought they had to do anything their husband told them...

Should this 16 year old girl- the victim of rape and incest be allowed to get an abortion-- or should she be penalized all her life for her wingnut Bible thumper father ?

Do you always have such a problem with reading comprehension?? Tam was talking about a situation like YOUR 15 year old daughter getting caught having consensual sex with her 19 year old boyfriend and the boyfriend being prosecuted for RAPE!!!! It was not rape...it was consensual, however , snce she was a minor HE goes to jail and HE is the one with the ruined life.
Are you sure in the situation you quoted that the mother was a "rightwingnut bible thumper"?? Those actions you quote sound more like something a liberal would condone.
 

Tam

Well-known member
TexasBred said:
Oldtimer said:
Tam said:
The Dems are trying to tag Ryan to Akin over the fact they co-signed a bill that forbid Government funding of Abortions which doesn't exclude rape.

Now the Dems are claiming RAPE IS RAPE and the Republicans are punishing those women who are raped. BUT is all rape the same NO it's not.
When you have a Violent/ Forcible Rape that is one thing but when you have a 19 year old get his 15 year old UNDERAGED sexually active girlfriend pregnant that is quite another thing, and in legal terms that is still RAPE. STATUTORY RAPE

So should US tax Payers pay for an abortion due to statutory rape or should the parents of the sexually active CHILD be held responsible for their daughter's behavior?

Not all rape is forced like the Dems would have one believe so I agree the Government should not have to pay for all abortions due to rape. VIOLENT RAPES YES STATUTORY RAPE NO.

I think AKIN was totally wrong with his stupid comment and should step down but that does not change the fact Dems are using a VERY WIDE BRUSH to make Romney, Ryan and the rest of the Republicans look like they stand with Akin and HIS STUPID COMMENTS.

My God Tam- what an insult to women- and especially rape victims you are... How much force should a women put up to say no - or resist? Are you one of those that believe they should die before being raped? What is your definition of resistance... I'd love to have you tell some of the victims I've worked with that they didn't resist enough :roll:

I only wish you had to ever work with women who had been raped....Or the raped children...

Real life true situation-- a smalltown minister was having his wife "marry" him to his daughters as soon as they reached puberty (usually around 12-13)- and then having sex with them...When his oldest became pregnant she related the whole thing to a friend- and along with her testimony and sisters- Daddy took a long trip to prison.... Sadly Momma got a suspended sentence because she was just one of those rightwingernut bible thumper wives that thought they had to do anything their husband told them...

Should this 16 year old girl- the victim of rape and incest be allowed to get an abortion-- or should she be penalized all her life for her wingnut Bible thumper father ?

Do you always have such a problem with reading comprehension?? Tam was talking about a situation like YOUR 15 year old daughter getting caught having consensual sex with her 19 year old boyfriend and the boyfriend being prosecuted for RAPE!!!! It was not rape...it was consensual, however , snce she was a minor HE goes to jail and HE is the one with the ruined life.
Are you sure in the situation you quoted that the mother was a "rightwingnut bible thumper"?? Those actions you quote sound more like something a liberal would condone.

It is clear that the pig didn't read the whole post before he started his attack on me as if he had he would not have asked how I stood on abortions for Violent rapes as in the first post I said
Not all rape is forced like the Dems would have one believe so I agree the Government should not have to pay for all abortions due to rape. VIOLENT RAPES YES STATUTORY RAPE NO.

But then that is what happens when you are Typing under the influence of BOOZE AND STUPIDITY and are looking for is a CHANCE TO ATTACK. :roll:

BTW I believe what Oldtimer was using in his attack on me would be considered INCEST and In the orginal post I said nothing about INCEST which I believe is worse that Rape and the family member/father should have his member cut off. And the child should never be forced to have contact with either of these sick parents ever again. There is no excuses for parents to do such crap to their Children. Parents are to PROTECT their Children, not use them as SEX TOYS. :mad:
 

Mike

Well-known member
In all seriousness, OT is not a well person. It's to the point that he mis-reads others & makes up stuff on just about every post he makes.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Mike said:
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
I wonder how many rapes are twarted by women having the right to carry?

Meanwhile OT wants to take that right to defend oneself away....

Hypocrit dreaming and lying again.. I have never opposed concealed carry - in fact when I was in office I authorized more concealed weapons permits than had ever been given out in the entire county before...

Too bad you continue to shoot from the hip with your made up stories without checking the facts! :(
You have defended gun laws in general and even defended the taking up of guns for all citizens using some of the old "Wild West" incidents as precedence.

No, you are for "concealed carry" for those you personally approve to carry. So therefore you have opposed concealed carry for certain citizens. For many, that is NOT a "Constitutional" stance.

Now who is dreaming and lying? :lol: :lol:

The more you post, the more you dig yourself into a credibility hole. :roll:

Most sane people realize the need for some gun laws- or we could have 6 year olds walking in and buying Saturday Night specials-- or multi convicted felons out buying Ma Deuces and LAWS M72 rockets to put on their Bubba trucks for their next bank robbery raid.....

And like I said- local gun laws have a history/precedent in this country for generations- out west here going back to the old mining towns and cowtowns...The Earp brothers were famous for enforcing an ordinance making anyone coming to town turn in their guns til they left town... John Wayne even reinacted that ordinance in some of his movies...

And do you really believe any Tom, Dick, or Harry that can get their hands on a gun should be allowed to pack it? or pack it concealed?

I probably shouldn't do this- knowing not to put personal pictures up amongst the pervert bunch :roll: ..
But I'm pretty proud of this granddaughter of mine..4 years old- and already a pretty fair shot- with the pink Savage 22 and muffs she got for her birthday... Her Daddy was a sniper in Iraq, so he will teach her well... This was taken last night when she was out at the house.. I told her to practice lots- and next spring I'll take her out hunting gophers when the dumb little ones come out...

I am 100% behind responsible gun ownership and use of firearms...But think there are too many irresponsible people in this world to not regulate ownership....

533132_455488831138499_2007631558_n.jpg
 

Mike

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Mike said:
Oldtimer said:
Hypocrit dreaming and lying again.. I have never opposed concealed carry - in fact when I was in office I authorized more concealed weapons permits than had ever been given out in the entire county before...

Too bad you continue to shoot from the hip with your made up stories without checking the facts! :(
You have defended gun laws in general and even defended the taking up of guns for all citizens using some of the old "Wild West" incidents as precedence.

No, you are for "concealed carry" for those you personally approve to carry. So therefore you have opposed concealed carry for certain citizens. For many, that is NOT a "Constitutional" stance.

Now who is dreaming and lying? :lol: :lol:

The more you post, the more you dig yourself into a credibility hole. :roll:

Most sane people realize the need for some gun laws- or we could have 6 year olds walking in and buying Saturday Night specials-- or multi convicted felons out buying Ma Deuces and LAWS M72 rockets to put on their Bubba trucks for their next bank robbery raid.....

And like I said- local gun laws have a history/precedent in this country for generations- out west here going back to the old mining towns and cowtowns...The Earp brothers were famous for enforcing an ordinance making anyone coming to town turn in their guns til they left town... John Wayne even reinacted that ordinance in some of his movies...

And do you really believe any Tom, Dick, or Harry that can get their hands on a gun should be allowed to pack it? or pack it concealed?

Anyone that can afford, or steal a gun can & does pack it now. Just not legally.

Numerous laws have NOT stopped the criminals.

We've had a couple of dozen gun murders, and an untold number of shootings this year in the town close to me and each one was committed by the illegal firearm carrier. (According to a Deputy friend of mine.)

Chicago is one of the toughest "Gun Law" cities in the nation. If you were to check the number of shootings there, it would scare even you.

Your "Six Year Old" analogy is silly.......................................

In Switzerland, almost everyone totes a gun.

It's all a frame of mind. Some have more frames than others.

Like I said, you are all for "Concealed Carry", but only by those you choose.

You can't have it both ways.
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Good for your grand daughter,,,,she needs some brightness in her llfe knowing who and what her grandfather is((the lying bigot hypocrite)))
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Mike said:
Like I said, you are all for "Concealed Carry", but only by those you choose.

You can't have it both ways.

When I was in office- I only turned down one applicant out of the 100's that were filed/issued-- and that was because that person had a previous misdemeanor conviction for marijuana possession- and was under an active investigation for possession and sale of drugs at the time..
Not the type person I thought the government should be giving a permit to pack a concealed weapon... I held up a few applications for a while- until I was satisfied the person could handle a weapon- and had the safety education and firearm training....

Some folks should not be packing guns on the street...
 

Tam

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
I held up a few applications for a while- until I was satisfied the person could handle a weapon- and had the safety education and firearm training....

Some folks should not be packing guns on the street...

So talking about SAFETY EDUCATION AND FIREARM TRAINING do they teach you, you should wear your sidearm into a bar and allow the ladies drinking in the bar to rug up against it so they can feel safe from the guy that just shot up the Hospital parking lot while you are also drinking? I'm just wondering as I heard that happens in the WILD WEST. :wink:
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Mike said:
Like I said, you are all for "Concealed Carry", but only by those you choose.

You can't have it both ways.

When I was in office- I only turned down one applicant out of the 100's that were filed/issued-- and that was because that person had a previous misdemeanor conviction for marijuana possession- and was under an active investigation for possession and sale of drugs at the time..
Not the type person I thought the government should be giving a permit to pack a concealed weapon... I held up a few applications for a while- until I was satisfied the person could handle a weapon- and had the safety education and firearm training....

Some folks should not be packing guns on the street...


After all the other lies you have told us we are supposed to BELIEVE that?????


In a county with about 7000 population,,,]yes sure uhhhh huhhh
 

Larrry

Well-known member
I probably shouldn't do this- knowing not to put personal pictures up amongst the pervert bunch ..
But I'm pretty proud of this granddaughter of mine..4 years old- and already a pretty fair shot- with the pink Savage 22 and muffs she got for her birthday... Her Daddy was a sniper in Iraq, so he will teach her well... This was taken last night when she was out at the house.. I told her to practice lots- and next spring I'll take her out hunting gophers when the dumb little ones come out...

That was completely uncalled for you sick SOB. First calling people on here perverts and then bringing your family into it with implications that Ranchersnet people are perverts.


You lying SOB, you should retract what you said....IT WAS TOTALLY OVER THE LINE.
 
Top