• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

The difference between the two sides of this industry.

A

Anonymous

Guest
Conman: "SH, how do you know it was a lie? Go ask the Walmart man in your town. You may have the same experience. For you to be as omniscient as you claim that you know what happened in my experience is really putting yourself in the place of God. Do you really want to do that?"

The simple fact that you believe some lady at Walmart that told you that Walmart sells "USDA SELECT" beef as "USDA CHOICE" beef is proof that it actually occurred proves just how biased, how blame ridden, and how incredibly stupid you really are.

TALK IS NOT FACT! TALK IS TALK AND TALK IS CHEAP!



~SH~
 

Econ101

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
Conman: "SH, how do you know it was a lie? Go ask the Walmart man in your town. You may have the same experience. For you to be as omniscient as you claim that you know what happened in my experience is really putting yourself in the place of God. Do you really want to do that?"

The simple fact that you believe some lady at Walmart that told you that Walmart sells "USDA SELECT" beef as "USDA CHOICE" beef is proof that it actually occurred proves just how biased, how blame ridden, and how incredibly stupid you really are.

TALK IS NOT FACT! TALK IS TALK AND TALK IS CHEAP!



~SH~

The "lady" wasn't at Walmart. she was on the other end of Tyson's toll free number for questions. You can't even get your facts straight before calling them "a lie".
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Conman,

Do you honestly think that after all the lies you have told on this site I am going to take you at your word that some lady, through a toll free number, "supposedly" representing Tyson claimed that Walmart is selling "USDA SELECT" as "USDA CHOICE"??? You're out of your mind if you do. I don't believe a single word you say. You've buried any credibility you ever had with your repeated lies.

The bottom line is that Walmart is not selling "USDA SELECT" as "USDA CHOICE" and you will never prove that they are. It's just one more of your many bullsh*t conspiracy theories you drum up in your conspiring mind.



~SH~
 

Econ101

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
Conman,

Do you honestly think that after all the lies you have told on this site I am going to take you at your word that some lady, through a toll free number, "supposedly" representing Tyson claimed that Walmart is selling "USDA SELECT" as "USDA CHOICE"??? You're out of your mind if you do. I don't believe a single word you say. You've buried any credibility you ever had with your repeated lies.

The bottom line is that Walmart is not selling "USDA SELECT" as "USDA CHOICE" and you will never prove that they are. It's just one more of your many bullsh*t conspiracy theories you drum up in your conspiring mind.



~SH~

I don't believe you will believe anything you don't want to believe regardless of the facts.

You should try getting a job in the 11th circuit. You would have plenty of like minded people there.

Are you having any luck selling that purple koolaid with your followers?
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
Sandbag: "You contradict yourself again! What's the trigger, price or quality? Make up your mind."

You fail to back your allegation of a contradiction again.

More cheap talk!

Each situation is different regarding when price is the trigger, when quality is the trigger, and when "rarity" (novelty) is the trigger.

Only an idiot like you would think that each situation is comparable to the next.

Price and quality are both factors that affect consumer purchasing decisions but in the case of Canadian beef vs. US beef, WHICH IS WHAT WE ARE DISCUSSING HERE, US beef does not have a quality advantage so the novelty item prevails.

Want proof?

New Zealand lamb outsold US lamb at the retail meat counter. WHY? NOVELTY!

No significant price or quality differences.

NEXT!


~SH~


You first said the consumer will vote for cheap food 98% of the time. I suppose they vote for quality 1% and novelty 1%? Maybe it's quality 1.5% and novelty .5%?

Get back in the little car, clown. :lol:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sandbag: "You first said the consumer will vote for cheap food 98% of the time. I suppose they vote for quality 1% and novelty 1%? Maybe it's quality 1.5% and novelty .5%?"

Yet another deceptive spin job by the Master of ILLUSION.

Voting for cheap food policies does not negate their concerns for quality or trying new products you idiot!


~SH~
 

Econ101

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
Sandbag: "You first said the consumer will vote for cheap food 98% of the time. I suppose they vote for quality 1% and novelty 1%? Maybe it's quality 1.5% and novelty .5%?"

Yet another deceptive spin job by the Master of ILLUSION.

Voting for cheap food policies does not negate their concerns for quality or trying new products you idiot!


~SH~

SH, greed negates their concerns for quality.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
Sandbag: "You first said the consumer will vote for cheap food 98% of the time. I suppose they vote for quality 1% and novelty 1%? Maybe it's quality 1.5% and novelty .5%?"

Yet another deceptive spin job by the Master of ILLUSION.

Voting for cheap food policies does not negate their concerns for quality or trying new products you idiot!


~SH~

So what did you mean with your 98% nonsense, then?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sandbag: "So what did you mean with your 98% nonsense, then?"


Simply pointing out the fact that consumers outvote producers 98% to 2%. They have no loyalty to the beef industry unless they prefer beef over chicken and pork independent of price. Most consumers base their shopping decisions on where they believe they receive the most value for the price. If that happens to be chicken, beef sales decline.

In the case of Canadian beef, just like New Zealand lamb, if you have US commodity beef setting next to "MAPLE LEAF SOURCE VERIFIED BEEF" at the same price, the novelty item will outsell US commodity beef.



~SH~
 

Econ101

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
Sandbag: "So what did you mean with your 98% nonsense, then?"


Simply pointing out the fact that consumers outvote producers 98% to 2%. They have no loyalty to the beef industry unless they prefer beef over chicken and pork independent of price. Most consumers base their shopping decisions on where they believe they receive the most value for the price. If that happens to be chicken, beef sales decline.

In the case of Canadian beef, just like New Zealand lamb, if you have US commodity beef setting next to "MAPLE LEAF SOURCE VERIFIED BEEF" at the same price, the novelty item will outsell US commodity beef.



~SH~

Voters outvote packers 98% to 2%. Your kind of "government" is in real deep trouble here. Most in Congress are to blame but the ones not doing oversight and committee heads--past and present-- are the ones to blame most of all. They are the ones managing government fraud for their friends just to get money for their party. It is the selling of integrity for money. It isn't just happening in agriculture.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
Sandbag: "So what did you mean with your 98% nonsense, then?"


Simply pointing out the fact that consumers outvote producers 98% to 2%. They have no loyalty to the beef industry unless they prefer beef over chicken and pork independent of price. Most consumers base their shopping decisions on where they believe they receive the most value for the price. If that happens to be chicken, beef sales decline.

In the case of Canadian beef, just like New Zealand lamb, if you have US commodity beef setting next to "MAPLE LEAF SOURCE VERIFIED BEEF" at the same price, the novelty item will outsell US commodity beef.



~SH~

Whatever, SH. Why was I expecting a straight answer from you? Your 98% comment was not on demographics. :roll: You were talking price and now you're switching to value. You're just talk, talk, talk, and no think.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sandbag: "Your 98% comment was not on demographics."

Prove it! Bring the quote.

You'll dance!


Sandbag: "You were talking price and now you're switching to value."

Hahaha!

Price is part of value you dork!


You better quit while your behind.



~SH~
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
Sandbag: "Your 98% comment was not on demographics."

Prove it! Bring the quote.

You'll dance!


Sandbag: "You were talking price and now you're switching to value."

Hahaha!

Price is part of value you dork!


You better quit while your behind.



~SH~

Bring the quote? You don't know what you said? It's in this very same thread!

Get back in the little car.
 

Latest posts

Top