Econ101 said:
MRJ said:
Many of your comments surely do sound as though you fell quite superior to many of us, in fact you have stated it pretty clearly about me and others.
Aside from that, good for you. Fortunately, God works in mysterious ways to achieve his will and we humans are too prone to take too much credit for what little part we play in it. Sadly, doing good works and giving of ones riches in as much secrecy as possible isn't always doesn't rate high with a lot of people.
So.......you do your branding with a wood fire. Do you rope the calves and drag them to the fire? Have wrestlers, or use Nord forks and one wrestler per calf? Lots of different ways to achieve a successful branding and cope with lack of young guys/gals able and willing to do the calf wrestling. Not too many of us still use the wood fire with the propane stoves so convenient.
MRJ
MRJ, just because I disagree with you passionately doesn't mean I think I am any better than you in the eyes of the One that matters-or anyone else, including sh or agman, or whoever else. I have always been interested in what makes people have those perceptions. I have found some of the "best" people to not be those that others value. I look for different things in people than many.
We don't have to brand here. It was a figure of speech to say that we have responsibilities here we need to attend in our country.
1. We don't HAVE to brand here, either, but must have cattle we sell inspected to determine ownership. What do you do to assure your cattle don't get stolen? Or am I incorrectly assuming you do own cattle?
2. So, if you do not think you are better than others, why do you so occasionally imply, or even come right out and state that there is something wrong with my (and others') reading comprehension, or intelligence, when the fact well may be that it is a simple case of your disagreement that is the real deal?
3. Re. outrageous rates of pay for some executives: are you omniscient enough to decide how much such pay should be? Are you willing for government to set limits on their pay? Wouldn't that lead to limits set by government for all work, if carried to logical conclusions? I certainly believe it is healthier for pay scales to be based upon the value of the work to the business paying the salaries, rather than on what someone "needs" to live on. "Need" seen differently by different people. And value being related to the ABILITY of the business to pay. What you see wrong with that?
4. Or is that how you believe the world should be run, since you seem disdainful of private enterprise, 'corporate' business, government (or is it just Republican administrations you hate?
5. Didn't you notice that "tax cuts for the rich" has resulted in MORE jobs created by those "rich" businesspeople, ultimately resulted in MORE tax collected from MORE people working?
MRJ