• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

The ISIS Bucket Challenge

Larrry

Well-known member
Raising awareness, one drop at a time.


The ISIS Bucket Challenge: a life-saving activity involving dumping buckets of piss on the heads of Western pacifists with "Coexist" bumper stickers to raise their awareness about them actually having those heads, at least until ISIS shows up and chops them off.
- See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/the-isis-bucket-challenge-t14837.html#sthash.RNUbJ7PN.dpuf

ISIS_Bucket_Challenge.jpg
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Andy Borowitz

Poll: U.S. Military Action in Middle East Bound to End Well
WASHINGTON - A new poll released on Friday indicates broad support for new U.S. military action in the Middle East, with a majority of Americans agreeing with the statement, "This is the kind of thing that usually ends well." Among the features of the proposed military action that received high marks in the poll, an "undefined coalition," "unspecified price tag," and "no exit strategy" were all seen as encouraging ingredients for success. Additionally, the respondents agreed that identifying exactly who the moderate faction is in a Middle Eastern civil war is "the kind of thing the United States is really good at." Overall, the poll reflected the American people's optimism about the latest U.S. involvement in the Middle East, with seventy-one percent agreeing with the statement, "What could possibly go wrong?"
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Andy Borowitz

Poll: U.S. Military Action in Middle East Bound to End Well
WASHINGTON - A new poll released on Friday indicates broad support for new U.S. military action in the Middle East, with a majority of Americans agreeing with the statement, "This is the kind of thing that usually ends well." Among the features of the proposed military action that received high marks in the poll, an "undefined coalition," "unspecified price tag," and "no exit strategy" were all seen as encouraging ingredients for success. Additionally, the respondents agreed that identifying exactly who the moderate faction is in a Middle Eastern civil war is "the kind of thing the United States is really good at." Overall, the poll reflected the American people's optimism about the latest U.S. involvement in the Middle East, with seventy-one percent agreeing with the statement, "What could possibly go wrong?"

So does this mean there may come a day when you actually utter a negative word about your Messiah?
 

Larrry

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Andy Borowitz

Poll: U.S. Military Action in Middle East Bound to End Well
WASHINGTON - A new poll released on Friday indicates broad support for new U.S. military action in the Middle East, with a majority of Americans agreeing with the statement, "This is the kind of thing that usually ends well." Among the features of the proposed military action that received high marks in the poll, an "undefined coalition," "unspecified price tag," and "no exit strategy" were all seen as encouraging ingredients for success. Additionally, the respondents agreed that identifying exactly who the moderate faction is in a Middle Eastern civil war is "the kind of thing the United States is really good at." Overall, the poll reflected the American people's optimism about the latest U.S. involvement in the Middle East, with seventy-one percent agreeing with the statement, "What could possibly go wrong?"

bogusflow.regular.png
 

Larrry

Well-known member
Defeat ISIS in the comfort of your own home

A three-step political fantasy to protect Americans and help Islam finally to become a religion of peace



By Oleg Atbashian | First published in the American Thinker

* * *

President Obama's White House statement on Aug. 28 was clear on two things: "ISIS must be defeated" and "we don't have a strategy yet."

With this in mind, let me offer a modest proposal that requires no military escalation, no additional defense spending, and no sacrifice of the American troops in the Middle East.

The president has already recognized the beheading of an American journalist as a terrorist attack on the United States and is said to be considering all options to protect Americans from the ISIS threat reaching the U.S. So let's take him at his own word and propose that his list of "all options" should begin with (1) an end to political correctness and (2) a moratorium on pandering to immigrant groups in order to win elections for the Democrats.

Let's call them Option One and Option Two. Like it or not, they must be in place before the president can even begin to think about protecting our borders and profiling terrorists at the airports in order to prevent any of the 3,000 members of ISIS who have U.S. or European passports from slipping into America, where they know they have an extensive and well-funded support base.

Which brings us to Option Three: extinguish their support base inside the U.S.

Limited airstrikes overseas have only limited benefits. Under the circumstances, it is similar to shooting at one tentacle of a global monster whose other tentacles have long ago worked their way into America and are recognized by the U.S. government as legitimate entities.

Terrorism in itself is never a goal, but rather a means in the arsenal of an entity whose other means include media, economic, cultural, and political manipulations that can bring down our society more effectively than terrorism alone.

It is this entity than needs to be killed, and here's how the president can do it if he is really serious.

Let Obama continue praising Islam as a constitutionally protected religion of peace. At the same time he must outlaw Sharia, stripping this pseudo-religious practice of the First Amendment protection. The president must honestly and officially acknowledge that Sharia is, in fact, a hostile, supremacist political ideology of total domination in a purely physical, not spiritual realm.

Let me explain.

How would you like to live in a world ruled by an unelected dictator, where religious beliefs of one denomination are enforced by the state, while all other beliefs are either forbidden or subject to a heavy taxation. Women are decreed as inferior creatures by the government; they are barred from education and must cover themselves lest they invite legitimate harassment and rape by superior males. Charging interest on a loan is a crime and therefore no one gives loans, at least not openly. Music and alcohol are forbidden, but the penal code includes public amputation of arms and legs, as well as stoning to death.

It will be a world of total conformity where all thought is regimented by a few religious texts, which also regulate your daily activities, from nutrition to personal hygiene. The citizens' highest duty is to impose their way of life on the outsiders, and the highest virtue is death in the name of these ideals. Questioning these rules is a crime and leaving the state religion means death.

What if you were promised that if you submit to such a political system, you will automatically obtain a superior "member" status with unlimited rights to dominate the inferior "non-members"? And if you were to agree, would you be able to describe your motives as purely spiritual and keep a straight face?

There is a big difference between religion (a system of faith and worship) and political ideology (a blueprint for a certain social order). Not knowing the difference is no excuse, and delusions of grandeur don't make one the master of the universe.

In order to exercise their supremacy, the "believers" must first build a society based on the above blueprint, with an oppressive state to enforce their "right" to dominate others. This alone blows their religious cover and places their intentions into the realm of utopian political ideologues. Their inability to create a functioning civilization with a full set of the above rules has been a source of frustration, resentment, and violent outbursts throughout the centuries.

The latest attempts include the Taliban in Afghanistan, Boko Haram in Nigeria, and most recently the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) who, in spite of their "religious" name, are driven by a very earthly goal of forcing everyone, through mass murder and terror, to submit to their supremacy. In this, they enjoy a broad support of "true believers" worldwide, who flock to the Islamic State from all corners of the earth, hoping to get their piece of the pie in the utopian totalitarian theocracy they call the Caliphate.

In this and other scenarios, Sharia has always served as a blueprint for a brutal supremacist theocracy. Given that the White House has rejected the word "Islamism" because it might give Islam a bad name, why not actually help Islam save face and declare all past bad behavior to be the result of Sharia?

Once dealing with Sharia as a hostile political ideology becomes fair game, this problem can finally get the treatment of the Ebola epidemic that it deserves. Like the Ebola virus, Sharia is lethal and is prone to deadly outbreaks - as seen in New York, London, Madrid, and thousands of other places around the world, taking hundreds of thousands of lives.

Just like Ebola requires careful quarantine, so does Sharia. Think of the Boston Marathon bombing as a Sharia outbreak. Think of the Fort Hood shooting as a Sharia outbreak. Once the culprit is known and isolated, it will only be a matter of time before all the hot spots are identified, quarantined, and extinguished.

Once the United States rids itself of the Sharia virus, others will follow, leaving fewer and fewer host bodies for Sharia to incubate and destroy.

In case anyone would rush to judgment and label this modest proposal "Islamophobic," consider that the official separation of Islam-the-religion from Sharia-the-totalitarian-ideology would benefit the proverbial peaceful and law-abiding Muslims in more ways than pandering to Islamic radicals ever could. With Sharia out of the way, Islam can finally have a chance to become a religion of peace in real life and not only in the speeches of double-speaking clerics and politicians.

The Democrats are known for their amazing skills to turn crises into opportunities. The ISIS crisis may not have been intentional, but here's a real opportunity to not let it go to waste - without leaving the comfort of the Oval Office or a golf course as the case may be.

Let's face it: a Republican president would never be able to do any of this effectively, lacking the support of the media and the cultural establishment. President Obama, on the other hand, is the darling of the media, academia, and the arts, which makes him uniquely positioned to employ these options and save the world from the threat of Islamic terrorism once and for all.

If Obama really meant what he said about considering all options, he should be using his phone and his pen right now.

~
- See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/defeat-isis-in-the-comfort-of-your-own-home-t14816.html#sthash.wWo26IV3.dpuf
 

Larrry

Well-known member
If this is turning into a satire, humor site we might as well go all the way. Just like ot when he came up with the ********* and rightwingernut handles we might as well show him that he is more of a leftwingernut teabagee
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Today 5:44 pm
White House Vows to Use Every Synonym for War Against ISIS

By Andy Borowitz

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—Amid some confusion as to whether it had, in fact, declared war on ISIS, on Friday afternoon, the White House attempted to clarify matters by vowing to use “every synonym for war at our disposal.”

After the Secretary of State John Kerry asserted that the United States was not at war, only to be contradicted later by the White House’s statement that it was, the White House spokesman Josh Earnest held a press conference to state that “no synonyms for war have been taken off the table.”

“Yes, this is a war,” Earnest said. “But it is also a conflict, a campaign, a struggle, a fracas, and, if you will, a melee.”



The spokesman said that there was no contradiction between Kerry’s position and the White House’s on the matter. “Though Secretary Kerry said that there was no war and we said that there was a war, we’re all on the same page in saying that there will be hostilities,” he said.

Earnest added that, over the next few days, the White House will determine what to call the enemy: ISIS, ISIL, the Islamic State, or something else entirely.

After 60 years of watching these war's/police actions that we're led into by old grey haired warmongers telling us we have to win to save the free world (Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq--plus dozens of pizzant civil wars)- that we have never won yet (but the free world exists and countries like Vietnam are now one of our top trading partners) I am quite skeptical about any grey haired politicians run up/propaganda for another police action (war)....

But I was getting closer to thinking this may be justified and even worth spending a few more Trillion $ and a few more thousand of our young men and womens lives--- UNTIL I saw Rush supported it.... :roll: :wink: :p



Andy Borowitz

For those of you who are undecided whether expanding the US mission in the Middle East is a good idea: Rush Limbaugh thinks it's a good idea.
 

Steve

Well-known member
But I was getting closer to thinking this may be justified and even worth spending a few more Trillion $ and a few more thousand of our young men and womens lives--- UNTIL

yep,.. we all realize it is difficult for you liberals to make a decision on your own..

but here is a list of polls to help you decide how you feel about it..

http://www.pollingreport.com/iraq.htm

and just remember,.. it is never to late to get into lockstep with the far left cult..






and if it helps you decide ,.. I actually agree with Obama on the airstrikes.. and disagree with him on arming the so-called Syrian moderates.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Today 11:49 am
Obama Unable to Sleep After Learning Limbaugh Liked His Speech

By Andy Borowitz


WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—President Obama has had two sleepless nights since learning that Rush Limbaugh praised his speech about Iraq and Syria this week, a White House source confirmed on Saturday.

According to the source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, the President has been unable to sleep since Limbaugh complimented him on the air and has been seen pacing back and forth in the Oval Office in a way that aides described as “worrisome.”

“When he heard that [House Speaker John] Boehner and [Senate Minority Leader Mitch] McConnell liked his speech, he seemed to take that in stride,” the source said. “But this Limbaugh thing has pushed him over the edge.”

After midnight on Friday, the source said, a member of the White House cleaning staff entered the Oval Office and found President Obama in his bathrobe and pajamas, staring at himself in a mirror.

“What have I done?” the President reportedly said to himself.
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Today 5:44 pm
White House Vows to Use Every Synonym for War Against ISIS

By Andy Borowitz

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—Amid some confusion as to whether it had, in fact, declared war on ISIS, on Friday afternoon, the White House attempted to clarify matters by vowing to use “every synonym for war at our disposal.”

After the Secretary of State John Kerry asserted that the United States was not at war, only to be contradicted later by the White House’s statement that it was, the White House spokesman Josh Earnest held a press conference to state that “no synonyms for war have been taken off the table.”

“Yes, this is a war,” Earnest said. “But it is also a conflict, a campaign, a struggle, a fracas, and, if you will, a melee.”



The spokesman said that there was no contradiction between Kerry’s position and the White House’s on the matter. “Though Secretary Kerry said that there was no war and we said that there was a war, we’re all on the same page in saying that there will be hostilities,” he said.

Earnest added that, over the next few days, the White House will determine what to call the enemy: ISIS, ISIL, the Islamic State, or something else entirely.

After 60 years of watching these war's/police actions that we're led into by old grey haired warmongers telling us we have to win to save the free world (Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq--plus dozens of pizzant civil wars)- that we have never won yet (but the free world exists and countries like Vietnam are now one of our top trading partners) I am quite skeptical about any grey haired politicians run up/propaganda for another police action (war)....

But I was getting closer to thinking this may be justified and even worth spending a few more Trillion $ and a few more thousand of our young men and womens lives--- UNTIL I saw Rush supported it.... :roll: :wink: :p



Andy Borowitz

For those of you who are undecided whether expanding the US mission in the Middle East is a good idea: Rush Limbaugh thinks it's a good idea.


So you admit you are a hypocrite, opposing something just because someone you dislike is for it??? :???: :???:

OH wait a second, you do not have thoughts. only those that are implanted in your brain by a second class wanna be comedian boring wittz
 

jigs

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
[
After 60 years of watching these war's/police actions that we're led into by old grey haired warmongers telling us we have to win to save the free world (Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq--plus dozens of pizzant civil wars)- that we have never won yet (but the free world exists and countries like Vietnam are now one of our top trading partners) I am quite skeptical about any grey haired politicians run up/propaganda for another police action (war)....

But I was getting closer to thinking this may be justified and even worth spending a few more Trillion $ and a few more thousand of our young men and womens lives--- UNTIL I saw Rush supported it.... :roll: :wink: :p



]
Oldtimer, can you tell me, in those 60 years, which one did you serve in?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
jigs said:
Oldtimer said:
[
After 60 years of watching these war's/police actions that we're led into by old grey haired warmongers telling us we have to win to save the free world (Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq--plus dozens of pizzant civil wars)- that we have never won yet (but the free world exists and countries like Vietnam are now one of our top trading partners) I am quite skeptical about any grey haired politicians run up/propaganda for another police action (war)....

But I was getting closer to thinking this may be justified and even worth spending a few more Trillion $ and a few more thousand of our young men and womens lives--- UNTIL I saw Rush supported it.... :roll: :wink: :p



]
Oldtimer, can you tell me, in those 60 years, which one did you serve in?


None- I went to Butte for my physical in 1968- but since I already had had knee operations and wasn't healed up from the last one I got stuck on the 1-Y status which I understand means they don't want you too bad unless we are in time of war ...

Then on the famous college party night of Dec. 1, 1969 (which for some the party went on for a week or more) , I won the lottery- got number 293- and was never called up....
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Andy Borowitz

As far as this ISIS mission goes, I feel that as soon as we figure out who we're fighting, who we're helping, who's helping us, and how to tell one from the other, we're golden.

As far as this ISIS issue I'm not so sure old comedian Andy doesn't understand the situation better than the President, Rush, or any of the politicians in D.C. bloviating from both sides.... :wink:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Kerry Claims U.S. Has Found a Moderate Syrian Rebel

By Andy Borowitz


WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—In what Secretary of State John Kerry described as a significant foreign-policy coup, the U.S. claimed, on Tuesday, that it had successfully located a moderate Syrian rebel.

Though Kerry did not elaborate on how the U.S. did so, he said that locating the rebel was “the culmination of a months-long effort.”

The Secretary of State said that the Syrian had been appropriately vetted and was deemed “moderately rebellious.”

“He definitely seems to be the sort of gentleman we can work with,” Kerry said, adding that several millions of dollars would be spent arming and training the rebel in the days and weeks ahead.

Kerry said that the government’s successful identification of a moderate Syrian rebel was a major victory that should silence critics of the U.S.’s strategy in Iraq and Syria.

“To all of the naysayers who have been arguing that there are no moderate Syrian rebels, I am here today to say that we have found one,” Kerry said. “And if we have found one, that means that there must be others out there.”
 

Steve

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Kerry Claims U.S. Has Found a Moderate Syrian Rebel

By Andy Borowitz


WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—In what Secretary of State John Kerry described as a significant foreign-policy coup, the U.S. claimed, on Tuesday, that it had successfully located a moderate Syrian rebel.

Though Kerry did not elaborate on how the U.S. did so, he said that locating the rebel was “the culmination of a months-long effort.”

The Secretary of State said that the Syrian had been appropriately vetted and was deemed “moderately rebellious.”

“He definitely seems to be the sort of gentleman we can work with,” Kerry said, adding that several millions of dollars would be spent arming and training the rebel in the days and weeks ahead.

Kerry said that the government’s successful identification of a moderate Syrian rebel was a major victory that should silence critics of the U.S.’s strategy in Iraq and Syria.

“To all of the naysayers who have been arguing that there are no moderate Syrian rebels, I am here today to say that we have found one,” Kerry said. “And if we have found one, that means that there must be others out there.”

yep probably the same moderate rebel that sold the journalists and aid workers to the ISIS butchers.. :roll: :roll: :shock:
 

Latest posts

Top