• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

The Magnitude of the Scam . . .

burnt

Well-known member
From "The American Thinker"
These liars are not just spinning a bit of propaganda, they are damaging the reputation of science in a way that will have a very negative, long-term impact.

"Clamoring alarmists can and will spin this until they’re dizzy. The ever-clueless mainstream media can and will ignore this until it’s forced upon them as front-page news, and then most will join the alarmists on the denial merry-go-round.

But here’s what’s undeniable: If a divergence exists between measured temperatures and those derived from dendrochronological data after (circa) 1960 then discarding only the post-1960 figures is disingenuous to say the least. The very existence of a divergence betrays a potential serious flaw in the process by which temperatures are reconstructed from tree-ring density. If it’s bogus beyond a set threshold, then any honest men of science would instinctively question its integrity prior to that boundary. And only the lowliest would apply a hack in order to produce a desired result.

And to do so without declaring as such in a footnote on every chart in every report in every study in every book in every classroom on every website that such a corrupt process is relied upon is not just a crime against science, it’s a crime against mankind."

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/crus_source_code_climategate_r.html
 

Steve

Well-known member
must be the same scientists that said Butter was bad, and scared everyone into switching to manufactured margarine with heart clogging trans fats..
 
Top