• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

The New Treason....Exposing the Myth of "Liberal Patrio

passin thru

Well-known member
http://www.trilobyte-mag.com/weekly.htm

The New Treason
Exposing the Myth
of
"Liberal Patriotism"


Down through the decades, we have heard from many Democratic luminaries that the Constitution is a "living document." Even Al Gore, the truly "elected" President, espouses the notion that the Constitution can be endlessly altered and amended, if only to extend legal protections to every sort of wheedling, behavior-based victim-group. The social grammar, the invisible infrastructure of our national life can (and should be) manipulated by small groups of griping people.

We changed the Constitution to accommodate brown people and female people and gay people, so why don't we modify the Constitution to accommodate even more people as well? Let's protect America itself, and all who live here, from the growing threat of Treason from within.

Since we've re-defined who and what a voter is, who and what a citizen is, who and what a baby is, and indeed what the actual meaning of "is" is, let's re-define who and what a traitor "is."

Times have changed, and the basic documents that formed our country should to be brought up to speed. Old-timey traitors would have transmitted their seditious information by runner, or horse messenger, by secret meetings, lantern flashes, encrypted notes, or servants and lackeys. Later (and even in ancient times) there were complex physical and linguistic ciphers. Then, in the Cold War, came covert coded radio transmissions, ingenious audio-tapes and micro-film.

But today's anti-American ideas can be communicated in a thousand new and different ways.

Instantly.

Hatred can be spread in moments. Subversion flies over the satellite networks in the blink of an eye.

And there's a lot more of it in every blink.

On the Fourth of July, 2003, a woman called into C-Span and asserted that George Bush and his "cronies" like Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, and Donald Rumsfeld should be rounded up and killed. Yes, ..... killed. She dirtied the nation's birthday with the demand that the American president be assassinated.

Later in that same show, and on nearly every subsequent call-in show for weeks afterward, quite a few other people (all Democrats and Liberals, of course) advocated killing the president and his administration. They called President Bush "thug," "terrorist," "criminal;" they called him "Hitler," "killer," "deserter," "coward;" they called him "racist," "puppet," "dupe," "fascist," "thief," "deserter" and "LIAR!"

They maintain that America is the most criminal nation on Earth, the cruelest nation, the most hypocritical nation, the most tyrannical nation, indeed the most EVIL nation there ever was, and as such we deserve to be destroyed by the combined forces of the poor of the world, the workers of the world, the non-white people of the world, and especially by our Islamic victims.

These people absolutely HATE America. They hate our leaders. They hate our way of life. And they're all Americans themselves!

These Americans feed their hate to each other, and they feed on each other's hate. It grows logarithmically, like mold on old fruit, until all the malignant sheep are beating on the same drum. And the bleat goes on, day after day, week after week, year after year.

They've decided that not a day shall pass which doesn't contain at least one pernicious, seditious verbal assault on the American President, designed to destabilize the commander-in chief and insult the traditional American way of life.

As we've learned from hate-crime laws, speech can be as much a weapon as a gun. The intent behind the assault is what matters to the authorities. And the intent of these Bush-haters is to undermine and wound the president, undermine and wound America's place in the world, and to encourage others to both hate and act against this country (and especially President Bush).

Now, certainly there's a major difference to be drawn between the lawful free expression of political opinion and the unlawful sedition of traitors. And, of course, these America-haters insist that they are not traitors at all. What are they going to say?

In fact, they assert that they're Patriots! Honest to gosh Patriots! They insist that real patriots question authority, real patriots condemn a bogus president, real patriots fight to undermine a racist, sexist, energy profiteering econo-tocracy hell-bent on dominating, depleting, and destroying the whole world by enslaving its defenseless people and devastating the environment, all in the name of greed and profits for the few evil-doers (like Dick Cheney and that evil lying bastard Bush) at the top of the criminal capitalist pyramid.

They allege that America is well served by negative criticism. Would a marriage be well served by the kind of daily insults they heap on their own nation? How could any committed relationship withstand 50 years of withering criticism?

There is absolutely no doubt but that America's Left-wingers are at war with America itself. They admit it every day, they call their war The Struggle, The Good Fight, The Battle. And why do they wage war on America? Because America is evil. Because they hate what America is: a country running on merit instead of redistribution; a country where there are winners and losers; where it's possible for one person to have more than another; where the government doesn't federalize and reallocate money, goods, and services according to the eerie standards of social justice, political correctness, and mathematical cultural sameness.

But, in the end, there's nothing else for it. They ARE traitors. They're non-uniformed combatants waging a very real war on America from the inside out. Their main weapons are constant hate-speech and vicious lies spread to millions of other enemies, both here and all around the world.

Just like Al Qaida and other terrorist groups, they're characterized by their lack of obvious regimentation and organization. Sure, they have their Taliban at the top of the war effort. Liberal super-nitwits like Ted Kennedy, Michael Moore, Norm Solomon, Al Franken, Janeane Garafalo, Mike Farrell, Ralph Nader, Barbara Streisand, James Carville, Julian Bond, Noam Chomsky, Cornell West, Amy Goodman, Paul Begala and the laughable "poet" Baraka (Leroy Jones) are some of the most visible fighters in the war against America. But they, and their repugnant ilk, are only a small cadre of highly visible co-equal generals at the top of an angry pyramid built of shadowy activist cells that range from college professors and students to the retirees who spike every call on C-Span to the eco-terrorists and the disloyal idiots who think President Bush destroyed the World Trade Center. It's these lower-tier warriors who spread the hate of their superiors far and wide, indeed to the ends of the Earth, through the new communication technologies like Cable TV, Satellite Radio (NPR and Pacifica Radio come to mind), emails, Web-Logs, wireless phones, Net Meetings, Power-Point presentations, floppies and CD's.

Just imagine the damage Benedict Arnold might have done with a laptop connected to the internet! What damage might he have done with a rage-filled website like Smirking Chimp?

Again, the whole goal of all this hate and plotting is not the mere expression of political opinion but the actual destruction of the President, America, and the American way of life. They try to recruit more anti-Americanism here. Worse, they both encourage and validate more virulent extreme anti-American sentiments the world over.

That, ladies and gentlemen, is WAR!

War, as surely as if they were enemy soldiers running wild in our streets; War, as surely as if they were setting fires on Wall Street or shooting into the White House; War, as surely as if they were blowing up statues of the Ten Commandments or the Buddha. While Al-Qaida, the Taliban, and the last of Saddam's losers attack our soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq, our own home-grown Left Wingers attack the Commander-in-Chief. There is no difference whatsoever, not even one degree of separation, between the people in other lands who hate America and the Americans here who hate America and it's President. The intent is the same, the hate is the same, they're both tactics of War.

And Americans who make war on America are TRAITORS! Not Patriots.

It's about time we updated the Constitution by creating a new definition of treason for the 21st Century.

A definition which includes death threats against the President or his administration delivered over the public radio and television airwaves and through emails, websites, chat rooms, news groups and other internet facilities; a definition that includes the deliberate pollution of our common political information pool with lies plied by newspaper, magazine, radio, and television pundits designed to turn the hearts and minds of people against America itself; a definition which includes those people who actually make a living by trafficking in malice for America, it's government, and it's way of life.

It's about time wholesome Americans asserted their right to social justice. People who burn the flag are at war with America. People who call for the death of our leaders are at war with America. People who lie and distort, who mock and sneer at our national efforts are trying to undermine the administration of our very government itself by spewing hate and rancor toward the very economic institutions that support life on Planet Earth. They're at war with America, trying to ruin every wholesome thing for which America stands.

Now, if the woman who flipped the finger to Slick Willie Clinton (the infamous rapist president) was put in jail for three days, then surely the woman who called for the death of George Bush should get a few years in federal prison at the very least. Indeed, it would be a great lesson for college students to see a few of their professors sitting behind bars for spreading treasonous Anti-American contempt. And what a wonderful example for us all to see a few of these bile and venom filled C-Span grandmas washing prison laundry for the next five years, or swinging from a military gallows.

In the end, these traitors have, for far too long, hidden behind the phony notion that they are "patriotic dissidents." In fact, the Democrats have been waging a self-admitted decades-long war with America, just like the Taliban, only better ..... and longer. These people have, by their own admission, been conducting a "Struggle," a "Good Fight," a "righteous war," a "moral war," on their own country for the last 50 years.

In the past, there were fewer treasonous people simply because there were fewer people overall. Nowadays, there are billions of people and a comparable proportion of treasonous people among us, working their evil in the full light of day for all to see. It's just that easy. They spread their treason at the speed of light.

We, as citizens, must alter the Constitution of this great land to recognize and penalize this new treason with just as much force as our forefathers penalized the old-fashioned treason.

Today's New Treason is just as dangerous as any treason anywhere has ever been. Let's wake up and smell the traitors in our midst. Then punish them.
 

Kathy

Well-known member
Anybody who calls for death, does not understand freedom.

To expose the truth is every citizen's duty.

And, yes, the WTC collapsed because Bush and his friends appear to have found their "New Pearl Harbor" as called for in the PNAC document backed by Cheney et al. prior to Sept. 11, 2001. For this, they should be investigated. Or do you think Osama told NORAD to stand down?

Those exposing truths, are not treasonist. Those working within the laws of the constitution to bring about a change of government are NOT treasonists. They are citizens with different opinions than the present government, and it is their freedoms which must be defended.

Who authored this article? Are they afraid to put their name to this trashing of freedom of speech. (an attempt to control cyberspace by controlling the free exchange of information via the internet).

Hell, why vote at all! Just allow Bush to hand pick his successor. Oops, isn't that called a dictatorship.


PNAC - Project for a New American Century, google it.
"Rebuilding Americas Defenses"
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

page 63:

Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.

page 63, also:

In general, to maintain American military preeminence that is consistent with the requirements of a strategy of American global leadership, tomorrow’s U.S. armed forces must meet three new missions:

• Global missile defenses. A network against limited strikes, capable of
protecting the United States, its allies and forward-deployed forces, must be constructed. This must be a layered system of land, sea, air and spacebased components.

Control of space and cyberspace. Much as control of the high seas – and
the protection of international commerce – defined global powers in
the past, so will control of the new “international commons” be a key to
world power in the future. An America incapable of protecting its
interests or that of its allies in space or the “infosphere” will find it
difficult to exert global political leadership.

• Pursuing a two-stage strategy for of transforming conventional forces. In
exploiting the “revolution in military affairs,” the Pentagon must be driven
by the enduring missions for U.S. forces. This process will have two
stages: transition, featuring a mix of current and new systems; and true
transformation, featuring new systems, organizations and
operational concepts. This process must take a competitive approach,
with services and joint-service operations competing for new roles
and missions. Any successful process of transformation must be linked to
the services, which are the institutions within the Defense Department with
the ability and the responsibility for linking budgets and resources to
specific missions.
 

RoperAB

Well-known member
But yet they all live in America and if you offered them a one way ticket to someplace else they wouldnt leave.
Its sort of the same thing here in Alberta. Liberals come here because there liberalism has screwed the economies of where they lived before but yet they come here and take advantage of everything Alberta has to offer. Then they bite the hand that feeds them and hollar about how bad coservatism is :roll:
Isnt that right Kathy?
You know Kathy for the last 35 years our sovernty, national security and to a large extent the peaceful prosperous life we enjoy up here is due in a large extent to the United States.
 

Mrs.Greg

Well-known member
RoperAB said:
But yet they all live in America and if you offered them a one way ticket to someplace else they wouldnt leave.
Its sort of the same thing here in Alberta. Liberals come here because there liberalism has screwed the economies of where they lived before but yet they come here and take advantage of everything Alberta has to offer. Then they bite the hand that feeds them and hollar about how bad coservatism is :roll:
Isnt that right Kathy?
You know Kathy for the last 35 years our sovernty, national security and to a large extent the peaceful prosperous life we enjoy up here is due in a large extent to the United States.
Excellent post Roper :)
 

Kathy

Well-known member
In other words? You all support the killing of innocent children and civilians by Western forces which utilize depleted uranium weapons, and chemical weapons which indiscriminately kill everyone.

If the allied forces can do no wrong, in your minds, then the truth will only hit home for you, when it is too late.
 

Econ101

Well-known member
I don't care what you call me (liberal, conservative, democrat, republican, etc.....).

.....Just don't call me late to supper.

You need to be true to yourself no matter what others call you. Some people can't do that because they can't think.
 

passin thru

Well-known member
In other words? You all support the killing of innocent children and civilians by Western forces which utilize depleted uranium weapons, and chemical weapons which indiscriminately kill everyone.

If the allied forces can do no wrong, in your minds, then the truth will only hit home for you, when it is too late.

Try coming back with something other than ridiculous assumptions
 

Kathy

Well-known member
What are my ridiculous assumptions?

Are they, that many people on this board (the most vocal) support the bombing to kingdom-come of the middle-east (Iraq, Lebanon, Afganastan etc)? Read what has been posted.

Are they, the use of DU weapons and chemical/bacterial weapons? This is proven fact.

If you don't agree with the killing of innocents in this manner, speak up against it. I for one, cannot sit back and support their use. Either side.

Are they, the incinuations regarding the World Trade Towers? It has now been shown, that "thermate" and bombs caused the WTC buildings to collapse. Building 7 fell almost free-fall - no plane hit building 7. Fires could not physically have caused their collapse.
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/

I don't want to be rude, I just want people to LOOK for themselves and quite relying on the media to interpret world events for them.
 

Cowpuncher

Well-known member
Kathy wrote"
Are they, the incinuations regarding the World Trade Towers? It has now been shown, that "thermate" and bombs caused the WTC buildings to collapse. Building 7 fell almost free-fall - no plane hit building 7. Fires could not physically have caused their collapse.
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/

Wow. I just found out that the devastation of the Pentagon was caused by a two-star general smoking a stogie.

You are almost at the head of the conspiracy-theory class. :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

Frankk

Well-known member
Cowpuncher said:
Kathy wrote"
Are they, the incinuations regarding the World Trade Towers? It has now been shown, that "thermate" and bombs caused the WTC buildings to collapse. Building 7 fell almost free-fall - no plane hit building 7. Fires could not physically have caused their collapse.
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/

Wow. I just found out that the devastation of the Pentagon was caused by a two-star general smoking a stogie.

:

Well I guess that explains why there was such a small hole in the building.
 

nonothing

Well-known member
So is passing thru say no repulicant never threatened clinton when he was running the show?Some how I think crazy folk vote many different ways...Who gets more troops killed?......The ones that keep them in harms way or the ones fighting to bring them home.....Not one of you rebulicants has giving a reason for the troops to stay .....you may call the libreals that are fighting their own goverment to bring them home traitors.Why not call them realists,why would you want another botched war to continue to blacken the eye of your country.......The brits are bring their troops home....

The British Defence Secretary John Reid announced on Monday that the number of UK forces in Iraq will be reduced by 800 to 7,000, BBC reported......Does that make Mr Ried a traitor of his country PT?
 

Steve

Well-known member
If you don't agree with the killing of innocents in this manner, speak up against it. I for one, cannot sit back and support their use. Either side.

Then maybe you should get the terrorist to lay down thier weapons.....

as soon as they do there will be peace.....

as long as they advocate death to infidals, I want my goverment to bomb the crap out of them....with whatever nasty weapons we have....
 

Broke Cowboy

Well-known member
Kathy said:
In other words? You all support the killing of innocent children and civilians by Western forces which utilize depleted uranium weapons, and chemical weapons which indiscriminately kill everyone.

If the allied forces can do no wrong, in your minds, then the truth will only hit home for you, when it is too late.

You are the stereotypical Canuck - judging others by the standards you have lived.

So I will ask the following questions - you can answer if you chose to do so. You replies may be of interest.

1. If you were an Isreali and had given - GIVEN - back land you took in battle many years ago - and that land was now being used to launch missiles into your home country - what would you do?

2. Negoitations with terrorists does not work in the middle east. It is a sign of weakness. How do you stop the rockets from coming into your country?

3. If Isreal were to completely disarm today - what would happen to it?

4. If the terrorists stopped rocketing today - what would happen?

As for the comments on Afghanistan - as a women - if you lived there you would receive no medical care, no dental care, could legally be stoned to death or "honour killed", if found on the street alone - taken to the infamous stadium and shot or beheaded on the following Saturday.

The folks there are not hateful of the soldiers there - they do not want them there - but realize that without them there life would be reduced yet again to - no music, no radio, no dentists, no doctors, and incredibly high infant mortality.

In Iraq the fact is life is better now for some and the major killing is muslim on muslim - and much of that from imported terrorists - some from that magical left wing country called Canada. In fact there are terrorists there from Eastern Africa as well - living in Montreal.

The final fact for this one is that we are what we are because of where we live - very well protected by our southern neighbour. That neighbour is also our largest trading partner. Japan is always credited in the news as being a major player to the U.S. economy - but THEY - U.S. does over a billion dollars a day trade with Canada - do you really need to lock the gates with outrageous baby killing statements.

Final questions -

Where were your complaints when the terrorists sent human bombers into hotels and cities in Isreal - DELIBERATELY attacking civilians?

Where were your complainst when muslim terrorists sent walking bombs into resorts in Malaysia - DELIBERATELY killing civilians?

Where were your complaints when walking bombs entered the underground system in England and DELIBERATELY attacked civilains?

And I could go on.

What would you do to solve this issue?

Forget negotiations - tried by all countries to date and no success.

Finally - people are killed in war. To my knowledge there are NO deliberate attacks on civilians by western powers - but if the bad guys hang out in the suburbs - civilians will die unless they move or rise up and inform on the bad guys.

So "women and children" is a bleeding heart statement - they die because they are supporting the bad guys or they die because they are simply in the way.

Chemical weapons - you jest - ask the Kurds what happened to them - entire villages wiped out by your friendly Sadam. Just because he could.

Stop the emotion and think for a minute ......

Your answers may be very revealing - over to you. I believe you do not have to like it - and I know the soldier in the field does not like it - so give us another way. If you can.

To date no one has come up with a workable solution - show us your genius and help stop the war.

B.C.
 

Kathy

Well-known member
What right do we have to act outside our own country(s)?

The wars - conflicts of the middle-east are ancient in many cases, why do we think by dropping our troops in there, they will just stop.

Is the USA going to occupy China, Korea, Iran, Pakistan, and the rest of the world where society is not as "free" as North America.

Your questions (Broke Cowboy) are very good. The answers must come from an understanding of the truth, however.

I believe the truth lies in the downing of the World Trade Centers (for some of the debate). If the towers had not been brought down, would you still support the war on terror around the globe?

Since I have examined alot of video and documentation which outlines how the WTC were brought down by insiders within the USA government:

who had NORAD planes stand down, (Dick Cheney)

who preplanted "thermate" demolition charges and bombs inside the building prior to September 11,

who paid for the arming of an Afganastan tribes (Osama) to expel Russia, etc.

who warned their own to not fly or go to the WTC buildings that day,

who planned and orchestrated disaster scenarios about hijacked planes on that same day, so as to confuse the situation,

who claimed almost instantly, to know who all the hijackers were, even though some of these terrorists are alive and well today, and have been interviewed by the BBC.

who confiscated hoards of video camera surveillance from gas stations and hotels on Sept. 11 and refuse to show them to the public,

I could go on about the lies around 911. I have provided webpages with information for reading. If you have not read, watched and analyzed for yourself these pages, and videos like: "Terrorstorm" put out by Alex Jones which outlines "false flag operations" wherein governments have carried out covert acts of terror to instill fear in populations, in order to get the power to do whatever they want.

"Why we fight" by the BBC. "Loose Change", "Beyond Treason" - the facts about the use of depleted uranium weapons.

I don't automatically believe everything I see on these DVDs. I do further research, I confirm their references. Some things said are speculation; however, the vast majority of information is factual.

A conspiracy theory is based on speculation. What happens when the speculation is proven and becomes fact? When will the authorities acknowledge the facts around 911. Please read Dr. Steven Jones paper on "thermate" in the buildings, and the collapse (especially) of Building 7.

One of the posters here, put me onto another message board where the vast majority of people acknowledge the treasonist acts of GW Bush and those who sponsored the downing of the Towers. Heck, GW said he watched the plane hit the first tower before the video from the French film crew had been given to authorities. How did he see this?

Sorry, I have to leave it here for right now. I will come back later to talk about the rest of your questions because at least you are asking for better solutions. That, is essentially, what I want to see as well. Since depleted uranium leaves the area it was used in contaminated forever, not only are the citizens seriously affected; but, so are the troops who will be sent into the region to try and keep peace and prevent further attacks (from both sides).
 

Broke Cowboy

Well-known member
Yup - I want your answers to the questions, because it is happening now.

To go into rhetoric on 'what rights" and so on - not interested.

Just interested in answers to questions.

B.C.
 
Top