• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

The Party of Death

VanC

Well-known member
If It Was Up to Obama, This Woman Would be Dead
Doug Giles
Saturday, September 20, 2008

No, I’m not talking about Sarah Palin, I’m talking about Gianna Jessen.

If it was up to the abominable Obama, the to-be-aborted little baby, Gianna Jessen, would have been turned into worm dirt 31 years ago. Thankfully, Mr. Change and Mr. Hope wasn’t around back then to lay his liberal legislative death-dealing pen to Ms. Jessen’s fate—and the world is a better place for it.

So, who is Gianna Jessen?

Gianna is an abortion survivor. Yep, she kicked death’s butt and survived against all odds. Her medical records state that she was “born during a saline abortion,” and if Barack Obama would have had his way, she wouldn’t be here.

Barack Obama voted four times against affording these “born alives” their most basic human right. Chilling, eh? How progressive of you, liberals. Hitler would be proud, and I’m sure Satan is just giddy with your creative ways to slay that inconvenient little baby even if it survives your initial assault.

Jessen, with a Pit Bull spirit, survived being burned alive in saline solution for eighteen hours. Eighteen hours, ladies and gents! FYI: This is not the same saline solution you use to clean your contacts but a lethal cocktail of death intended to cook the unborn kid from the inside out.


Weighing in at 2 lbs at birth with cerebral palsy (thanks to the effects of the witch’s brew she stewed in), the gloomy doctors said little Gianna would never be able to hold up her head, sit up, crawl or walk.

God had different plans.

Not only did she hold her head up, sit, crawl and walk, but she has run in two twenty-six mile marathons and has spoken all over the world, on TV, in churches and on college campuses about the power of God and the sanctity of life. Put that in your stupid pipe and smoke it, all-wise and all-knowing doctors.

Liberals love being painted as the defender of the underdog. Yeah, if you feel like you are being abused, oppressed, preyed upon, neglected, entitled to something or endangered in any way . . . do not fear! The Dems are here! Their protection extends not only to the human victim, but also to the translucent hair lice, the gargling nut warbler, a warming globe, a rare venereal crab, and a whooping crane’s egg.

Yep, the liberals will ramp up to Mach2, set their hair on fire, and fight, yell, picket, protest and blog their fingers bloody for animal rights and for your rights—that is unless, of course, you’re an unborn child.


It is with the unborn baby that the “protectors of the weak” morph into the party that wreaks havoc upon the truly helpless. It’s interesting to see misty-eyed liberals go quasi-Talibanic for the little animal while they have absolutely no qualms whatsoever endorsing the snuffing out of the life of a tiny unborn human.

One of the reasons the barbaric left uses to convince themselves that they’re right on the issue of killing that inconvenient “little bugger” (as one of their own calls it) is that it is not yet a person.

Something that is really wrecking the “protectors of the weak” BS campaign of killing unborn kids, however, is ultrasound imagery (Oops. Didn’t see that coming, now did you?). These pics and videos are screwing up things for the pro-choicers. Back in the day when they were selling us on the “fetal blob” stuff, all we had at our disposal to contradict their nonsense was common sense and a very grainy 2D sonogram.

With the use of ultrasound imaging increasing daily, how a person can say that an unborn baby is not yet a person and can be killed at Mommy Dearest’s discretion is barbarically beyond me. I guess the left and the pink conservatives callous their hearts to the unborn by rejecting a proposition central to Judeo-Christian thought regarding life and death: namely, that human life (beginning at conception and lasting until the person naturally croaks) is intrinsically good and thus sacred—not just instrumentally good.

In contrast with the secular “elite,” the “stupid,” “non-elite” and “archaic” Judeo-Christian constituency believes that all people—from the embryo to the elderly, including severely developmentally disabled, people in comas and everyone in between—have dignity and value. As Robert George said, “Their significance is not based upon what they can do, or how they make us feel or whether or not we approve of their quality of life, but principally because they live.”

And yet, these secular barbaric “tools” see human beings as tools; and if they don’t somehow fit instrumentally within the secularists’ Darwinian, utilitarian utopia, they get tagged as “inconvenient” and are relegated to the “very expendable” list. That’s why abortion is no big deal, and neither is taking the life of a so-called defective child, or suicide, or “mercy killing” a helpless senior. But God help you if you should ever run a boat’s prop over a manatee’s back! They’ll get pissed!

Not only does Obama’s Party of Death (as Ramesh Ponnuru calls the libtards) advocate the death of the unborn and the inconvenient, but they also want your tax dollars to pay for their death wishes, for all parents to butt out of their teenage daughter’s abortion plans, and for the US to continue to stay left of Europe when it comes to abortion on demand. Consider all the above when you cast your vote in November, those of you on the left and the right who cherish the unborn more than a sea cow.

For all the 411 on Gianna Jessen and what she’s up to, go to www.BornAliveTruth.org. Send her money, watch her videos, play her radio spots and help her wake our nation up to Barack’s barbaric beliefs.

Copyright © 2008 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Very chilling Van. If everyone in the U.S. were required to read and comprehend this article, the results would dramatically change the outcome of the upcoming election.

Wonder how this girl, Gianna feels about ther mother? :cry: :cry:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Do you know how many women would die if abortion were made unlawful and the abortions went back into the back alley rooms?...

Something most folks forget- that back 30 years ago- it was the National Council of Churchs and several church groups that were fighting to legalize abortions just for that reason...And it was the middle class girls and the poor and the minorities that couldn't afford to fly to Europe for a legalized abortion that did the most dying...
 

Mike

Well-known member
Do you know how many women would die if abortion were made unlawful and the abortions went back into the back alley rooms?...

Abortion will never be made unlawful....the above is a stupid analogy, made by an obviously stupid person.

Roe vs. Wade has simply set too much precedence in the Courts.........

The issue is that Obama supports living, breathing children being killed who could have otherwise lived and become production citizens.

But I guess this type thinking is way above your pay scale? :roll: :roll:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Larrry said:
But what was your take on the article posted OT.

Oh its a crock argument that Sandhusker crew came up with- Obamas vote was against the wording of the bills- not the reason of the bills because it weakened a womans right under Roe v Wade.....Its been explained on here 10 times...

But the "party of death" bullpuckey is just that-- bullpuckey-- it should be the "party of choice"-- and thats what I believe in- that the decision on abortion is something that should be left between the Doctor, the Woman, and her God to decide.....And the argument that a bunch of old grey haired men sitting in a legislature know better is a joke.... Half of them lost touch with the real world years ago.....

I definitely oppose fiddling with the Constitution to ban abortion.....
 

VanC

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Do you know how many women would die if abortion were made unlawful and the abortions went back into the back alley rooms?...

Probably not even close to the 50 MILLION babies that have been murdered since 1973, most of which have been minorities and the lower class. Let's see, which party is it that claims to be fighting for minorities and the lower class? :roll: How much "hope" do those kids have?

Besides, as Mike said, that's not the main issue. The main issue is that that's not enough for some people, including Obama. They want to not only kill babies still in the womb, but those that survive an abortion attempt and are alive and breathing. Heck, why not go even further. Let's say a young couple has a baby but somewhere down the road their situation changes and the child becomes an inconvenience. Maybe we could give them the "right" to kill that child up to the age of, say, five or ten. Where does it stop?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Maybe we could give them the "right" to kill that child up to the age of, say, five or ten. Where does it stop?

I guess if thats what the people of your state and your state legislature decides it could happen...

The people of Oregon passed an assisted suicide and right to die with dignity law...

But it should not be a Federal government issue- and shouldn't even be an argument for someone running for a national office....The Federal government should have/be keeping their noses out of it.....
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
OT, "Oh its a crock argument that Sandhusker crew came up with- Obamas vote was against the wording of the bills- not the reason of the bills because it weakened a womans right under Roe v Wade.....Its been explained on here 10 times..."

It's been explained, but the explanation is not the truth. It's documented and proven that his explanation was not the truth. Records show that he in reality voted against the bill that included the wording that he said he would vote for.

HE'S LYING AGAIN!


 

VanC

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Oh its a crock argument that Sandhusker crew came up with- Obamas vote was against the wording of the bills- not the reason of the bills because it weakened a womans right under Roe v Wade.....Its been explained on here 10 times...

Yes, it's been explained on here before. Here it is again.

http://ranchers.net/forum/about27604.html&highlight=infanticide


http://ranchers.net/forum/about27685.html&highlight=infanticide
 

VanC

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Maybe we could give them the "right" to kill that child up to the age of, say, five or ten. Where does it stop?

I guess if thats what the people of your state and your state legislature decides it could happen...

Segregation was perfectly legal in many states not that long ago. The federal government stepped in. Were they wrong to do so?

Oldtimer said:
The people of Oregon passed an assisted suicide and right to die with dignity law...

That's a whole different ball game in my book.

Oldtimer said:
But it should not be a Federal government issue- and shouldn't even be an argument for someone running for a national office....The Federal government should have/be keeping their noses out of it.....

I agree that most issues should be left up to the states, but sometimes the Feds have to step in. We have certain rights that we're gauranteed under The Constitution. If a state passes a law that denies one or more of those rights, the federal govenment should step in and strike it down. The right to life is one of them. As for abortion, I would be happy at this point if it were thrown back to the states. At least some innocent lives would be saved.

As for "choice", well, I ain't buying it. I don't think anyone should have the "choice" to kill another person for the sake of convemience, even if that person is their own flesh and blood. Call it "choice". Call it "reproductive freedom". Give it any high minded, wonderful sounding euphemism you want. I call it murder, and I always will. I like to think of myself as being fairly open minded. I'm sure others feel differently. But this is one issue I will never compromise on or back away from. Millions disagree with me, and that's fine, but's that's the way it is.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
OT, "Oh its a crock argument that Sandhusker crew came up with- Obamas vote was against the wording of the bills- not the reason of the bills because it weakened a womans right under Roe v Wade.....Its been explained on here 10 times..."

It's been explained, but the explanation is not the truth. It's documented and proven that his explanation was not the truth. Records show that he in reality voted against the bill that included the wording that he said he would vote for.

HE'S LYING AGAIN!

OT, this guy looked into your eyes and bold-faced lied. It has been proven that he lied. He then looks into your eyes again and says, "Trust me to be your next president", and you're doing it. WHY?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sandhusker said:
Sandhusker said:
OT, "Oh its a crock argument that Sandhusker crew came up with- Obamas vote was against the wording of the bills- not the reason of the bills because it weakened a womans right under Roe v Wade.....Its been explained on here 10 times..."

It's been explained, but the explanation is not the truth. It's documented and proven that his explanation was not the truth. Records show that he in reality voted against the bill that included the wording that he said he would vote for.

HE'S LYING AGAIN!



OT, this guy looked into your eyes and bold-faced lied. It has been proven that he lied. He then looks into your eyes again and says, "Trust me to be your next president", and you're doing it. WHY?

IF this was an issue I was using to make my choice of who to vote for on (and its not), I would have to support Obama/Biden over McCain/Palin because like I said I believe in leaving folks to make their own choice ...

I think we have enough sticking their noses into personal issues by old grey haired men that think they are holier than thou and know better than everyone else....

As far as Lying- Do you want me to cover the post with videos and statements of out and out lies McBusch got caught in AGAIN :???:
It appears on that subject- you have to pick the lesser of two evils- and McBusch has a quarter century of history over Obama on that... :wink:
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Set this infanticide issue aside, what about the issue of him LYING?

Sure, bring me something as solid as this of McCain lying. If you have documented proof, let's see it.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sandhusker said:
Set this infanticide issue aside, what about the issue of him LYING?

Sure, bring me something as solid as this of McCain lying. If you have documented proof, let's see it.

I posted a bunch before....
 

fff

Well-known member
Perhaps a million people are dead in George W. Bush’s unnecessary, unprovoked war with Iraq. A million living, breathing human beings, men, women, children. The current Republican candidate for president promises more of the same in Iraq, plus cheerfully sings about escalating the war to include Iran and, possibly Russia. And you call the Democrats the "party of death"? You’re definitely a Republican. Probably a potential candidate for some high office.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sandhusker said:
Oldtimer said:
Sandhusker said:
Set this infanticide issue aside, what about the issue of him LYING?

Sure, bring me something as solid as this of McCain lying. If you have documented proof, let's see it.

I posted a bunch before....

Refresh my memory.

Here- you can check out 100's by both sides......

http://www.factcheck.org/
 
Top