• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

The REAL Obama Agenda

Traveler

Well-known member
The low-information Obama voters must be so proud of themselves.

the Destruction of US Nuclear Defense – the Long Overdue Fightback Begins

At a meeting in Seoul Korea, March 2012, with then Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, US President Barack Obama leaned toward Medvedev, thinking he was off mike and said, “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this can be solved, but it’s important for him [Prime Minister Vladimir Putin] to give me space.” He added, “This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.”

That was the single most important statement made by Obama in his entire first term of office.

The destruction of the US nuclear deterrent and the American military has been Moscow’s, Beijing’s and Havana’s number one dream for decades.

It is what Obama’s communist mentors such as Frank Marshall Davis, Alice Palmer and Bill Ayers, have always worked relentlessly towards. Now their protege has the power to make that hellish fantasy a reality.

At last some in Washington seem to be taking the US’ looming national suicide seriously.

NATIONAL SECURITY LEADERS TO PRESIDENT OBAMA: STOP THE UNILATERAL DENUCLEARIZATION OF THE UNITED STATES


February 22, 2013

(Washington, D.C.): A group of former senior military and civilian national security professionals today called on President Barack Obama to abandon his reported intention to make further, deep and apparently unilateral reductions in the U.S. nuclear arsenal.

Press accounts indicate that the President was planning on announcing a cut of as much as one-third of the American deterrent during his State of the Union address on February 12th. He evidently decided to postpone the unveiling of this initiative, however, when North Korea conducted on that same day it latest nuclear test – an event that underscored the fact that only the United States is, under his administration, engaging in denuclearization.

The authors, who include two former members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and eighteen others with “decades of experience with national security policy and practice,” declare:

“It is now clear that, as a practical matter under present and foreseeable circumstances, this agenda will only result in the unilateral disarmament of the U.S. nuclear deterrent. That will make the world more dangerous, not less.

In our professional judgment…America’s “Triad” of nuclear-armed land-based and submarine-launched missiles and bomber-delivered nuclear weapons have promoted strategic stability and discouraged proliferation. Steps that raise uncertainty about the viability, reliability and effectiveness of our deterrent will have the opposite effect.”

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr., the President and CEO of the Center for Security Policy which facilitated this letter, observed:

“As President Obama meets today with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, he is expected to emphasize the United States’ commitment to its most important Asian ally at a time when the threat to Japan from China and North Korea is growing by the day. The single most tangible thing Mr. Obama could do to give substance to such rhetoric would be to eschew further weakening of the U.S. nuclear arsenal – and the extended deterrent or “nuclear umbrella” it has constituted for nearly seventy years. The signers of this letter have rendered an incalculably important service by challenging the myth that doing otherwise in pursuit of a “world without nuclear weapons” is either achievable or desirable under present and foreseeable circumstances.”

Signers of the letter were:

http://www.trevorloudon.com/2013/02/the-real-obama-agenda-the-destruction-of-us-nuclear-defense-the-long-overdue-fightback-begins/
 

MoGal

Well-known member
Americans have been kept in the dark about our Haarp system and scalar weaponry (Russia, China and Israel have this)

Haarp can locate exactly where nuclear warheads are. It can find oil as well.
It can control weather and people just by changing the electromagnetic waves.

We have the capabilities to erect a shield, called the Tesla Shield that prevents any type of nuclear attack and yes we had these capabilities prior to 9/11 but I refuse to participate in any of those discussions.

If you can't find any info on it, let me know and I can come up with some.

To put it in perspective, have nuclear weaponry is like riding your horse to work and Haarp/scalar weaponry is like driving your car to work.
 

smalltime

Well-known member
Walking softly and carrying a big stick is still very important for America.We could walk a little softer than we have been if we get a bigger stick IMO.Nuclear weapons are the stick of choice because they really work.The last war the U.S.won was a nuclear end.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
MoGal said:
Americans have been kept in the dark about our Haarp system and scalar weaponry (Russia, China and Israel have this)

Haarp can locate exactly where nuclear warheads are. It can find oil as well.
It can control weather and people just by changing the electromagnetic waves.

We have the capabilities to erect a shield, called the Tesla Shield that prevents any type of nuclear attack and yes we had these capabilities prior to 9/11 but I refuse to participate in any of those discussions.

If you can't find any info on it, let me know and I can come up with some.

To put it in perspective, have nuclear weaponry is like riding your horse to work and Haarp/scalar weaponry is like driving your car to work.

This could be true, but even so, it makes no sense to get rid of weapons that you are keeping around for deterrents. You may know about HAARP, I may know about HAARP, but the tin-horn dictator that is thinking of stirring up some crap may only know about our nukes.
 

Mike

Well-known member
A report by the US State Department called "Adherence to and Compliance With Arms Control, Nonproliferation and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments" which was released on 28 July 2010 stated that Russia was not in full compliance with the START Treaty when it expired on 5 December 2009.

START (for STrategic Arms Reduction Treaty) was a bilateral treaty between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms. The treaty was signed on 31 July 1991 and entered into force on 5 December 1994.[1] The treaty barred its signatories from deploying more than 6,000 nuclear warheads atop a total of 1,600 ICBMs, submarine-launched ballistic missiles, and bombers. START negotiated the largest and most complex arms control treaty in history, and its final implementation in late 2001 resulted in the removal of about 80 percent of all strategic nuclear weapons then in existence. Proposed by United States President Ronald Reagan, it was renamed START I after negotiations began on the second START treaty.
The START I treaty expired 5 December 2009. On 8 April 2010, the replacement New START treaty was signed in Prague by U.S. President Obama and Russian President Medvedev. Following ratification by the U.S. Senate and the Federal Assembly of Russia, it went into force on 26 January 2011.
 
Top