• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

The real terror paymasters: the KGB

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
This is a 6 page article, I've post page 1 and a part of page 4


The real terror paymasters: the KGB has long sponsored the Muslim fundamentalist groups that have now become a global terror network carrying out the Marxist-Leninist revolution in Muhammad's name

In 1972, the Kremlin decided to turn the whole Islamic world against Israel and the U.S. As KGB chairman Yuri Andropov told me, a billion adversaries could inflict far greater damage on America than could a few millions.

In the quote above, Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa, head of the DIE, the KGB's little sister in communist Romania, reveals a conversation he had with chairman Andropov, the Soviet leader. "We needed to instill a Nazi-style hatred for the Jews throughout the Islamic world," Andropov told Pacepa, "and to turn this weapon of the emotions into a terrorist bloodbath against Israel and its main supporter, the United States. No one within the American/Zionist sphere of influence should any longer feel safe."

Gen. Pacepa, who defected to the United States in 1978, recounted this story in an August 24, 2006 article for National Review entitled "Russian Footprints." "According to Andropov," said Pacepa, "the Islamic world was a waiting petri dish in which we could nurture a virulent strain of America-hatred, grown from the bacterium of Marxist-Leninist thought. Islamic anti-Semitism ran deep. The Muslims had a taste for nationalism, jingoism, and victimology. Their illiterate, oppressed mobs could be whipped up to a fever pitch."

Gen. Pacepa explained how this was put into operation:

In the mid 1970s, the KGB ordered my service, the [Romanian] DIE
--along with other East European sister services--to scour the
country for trusted party activists belonging to various Islamic
ethnic groups, train them in disinformation and terrorist
operations, and infiltrate them into the countries of our "sphere
of influence." Their task was to export a rabid, demented hatred
for American Zionism by manipulating the ancestral abhorrence for
Jews felt by the people in that part of the world. Before I left
Romania for good, in 1978, my DIE had dispatched around 500 such
undercover agents to Islamic countries. According to a rough
estimate received from Moscow, by 1978 the whole Soviet-bloc
intelligence community had sent some 4,000 such agents of influence
into the Islamic world.

Likewise, Anatoliy Golitsyn, one of the most important KGB defectors to come to the West, noted in his 1995 book, The Perestroika Deception, "Under concealed Russian guidance, the Muslims of the former Soviet Union ... will seek to cooperate and ally themselves with Muslims in Iran and the Arab states while Russia maintains its open policy of cooperation and partnership with the West. In this way China openly and Russia secretly will jointly attempt to swing the balance of power in their favor in the highly strategic, oil-producing Arab/Iranian areas of the Middle East."

A July 1997 article by Associated Press writer Anthony Shadid provides one measure of the impact of this Soviet KGB (and ongoing Russian FSB) strategy. The AP story, "Marxism Makes Way for Islam," profiles a number of influential Marxist-Muslim intellectuals. It begins with the observation that "on the bookshelf of Adel Hussein sits an odd collection for one of Egypt's leading Islamic thinkers." Titles like Socialist Integration, On Communism, and Planning in the U.S.S.R. by leading Marxists, notes Mr. Shadid, "speak more of class struggle than the hand of God."

Like a surprising number of others across the Arab and Muslim world, Adel Hussein "is a one-time Marxist and nonbeliever who has turned to Islam, part of a new intellectual generation reshaping the religion." "I benefited from Marx in both theory and practice," Hussein told Shadid, "but now, Islam is my starting point and my framework." That doesn't mean he's abandoned Marx, however. "Hussein, for instance, says his goals have not changed," Shadid reported. "But he now sees Islam, through its ability to persuade and to mobilize, as the best tool." In other words, Islam for Hussein is a means to an end, and the end is a Marxist world.

Adel Hussein, says AP's Shadid, is representative of a significant number of today's influential imams and mullahs. "In a jarring twist, they are the same thinkers who a generation ago drew the ire of religious Muslims because their Marxist disavowal of God was seen as the biggest threat to Islam," Shadid reported. "Today, they are often the public face of Islam--writing in leading Arabic newspapers, speaking at conferences and on television talk shows, enjoying the support of many younger, more political Muslims interested in their attempts to rethink Islam's relationship to democracy, minorities and the West."

Evidence for the existence of an ongoing Soviet/Russian strategic plan to foment and use Islamic extremism is very extensive and goes far to explain the inordinate hatred of Muslim fundamentalists for America and the West. Not only is al-Qaeda aligned with the Kremlin (see the article on page 10), so are the other major "Islamist" terror groups including PLO/ al-Fatah, Hamas, and Hezbollah (see the sidebar below). Of course, none of those groups would amount to much if not for the immense assistance they receive from Iran and Syria, regimes that were primary client-state terror sponsors for the Soviets and continue in that role for Russia under Putin.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0JZS/is_18_23/ai_n25011411/



From page 4.


We in the Christian West should not kid ourselves--as certain "liberals" would have us do--into accepting the false proposition that Islam is perfectly compatible with our social-political system. It is not (see page 31). And we must not succumb to their arguments that we should accept new waves of Muslim immigrants. But neither should we allow ourselves to be further dragged into a military "clash of civilizations" (as we already are in Iraq and Afghanistan) by "Muslim" front men for our so-called allies in Moscow and Beijing.

In his October 11, 2001 news conference, President George W. Bush characterized the new global conflict as "a war against all those who seek to export terror, and a war against those governments that support or shelter them." Striking the same theme, but with greater specificity, Weekly Standard editor William Kristol declared in a July 21, 2006 article, "Radical Islam Takes On Democracy," that "our focus should be less on Hamas and Hezbollah, and more on their paymasters and real commanders--Syria and Iran."

But why stop with the middlemen? The real paymasters and commanders aren't in Damascus and Tehran; they're in Moscow and Beijing, as they have been for decades. These paymasters and commanders are also patient strategists. They will not try to engage us in head-on military conflict when they can more easily wear us down by leading us into many "quagmire" conflicts with their surrogates.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
RELATED ARTICLE: Who's who in terrorism.

by William F. Jasper

PLO/al-Fatah. For nearly four decades, the PLO has been the largest, wealthiest, and most politically connected terrorist organization in the world. For most of that time, it was held in the firm grip of Yasser Arafat's iron fist. But Arafat was not the fierce, independent actor he posed as; he was completely dependent on the Soviet KGB and its surrogate Warsaw Pact intelligence services for arms, training, logistical support, funds, and direction. His KGB handlers included Vasali Samoylenko, Vladimir Buljakov, and Soviet "Ambassador" Alexander Soldatov. Arafat's closest friend and head of PLO intelligence, Hani Hassan, was actually an agent of the DIE, the Romanian subsidiary of the KGB.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0JZS/is_18_23/ai_n25011411/pg_4/?tag=content;col1
 

Steve

Well-known member
Between the signing of the Oslo Accords in August 1993 and July 2000, the US Congress appropriated $900 million in foreign aid to the PLO/PA, with the aim of moderating the PLO,

From its very beginning, the PLO received the bulk of its funding from the United States through the United Nations (UN). Amounting to some $250 million per year during the 1970s, the funding grew to approximately $500 million annually by the 1990s — even as the PLO was attacking American targets and murdering American citizens.

Starting in the mid-1990s, the U.S. government began adding yet more hundreds of millions of dollars per year in direct aid to the PLO and its Palestinian Authority (PA); today, the PLO receives the staggering sum of well over $1.5 billion per year, over $1 billion of that from American taxpayers.



http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/45198.pdf
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Steve said:
Between the signing of the Oslo Accords in August 1993 and July 2000, the US Congress appropriated $900 million in foreign aid to the PLO/PA, with the aim of moderating the PLO,

From its very beginning, the PLO received the bulk of its funding from the United States through the United Nations (UN). Amounting to some $250 million per year during the 1970s, the funding grew to approximately $500 million annually by the 1990s — even as the PLO was attacking American targets and murdering American citizens.

Starting in the mid-1990s, the U.S. government began adding yet more hundreds of millions of dollars per year in direct aid to the PLO and its Palestinian Authority (PA); today, the PLO receives the staggering sum of well over $1.5 billion per year, over $1 billion of that from American taxpayers.



http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/45198.pdf

all lies of course...how much do we give Israel each year that they turn around and pay off our politicians with? billions....

do the Palestinians have nukes? I wish they did as they would have a peace agreement overnight I promise...wish Russia would sell them nukes as it would end the problems over there...
 
Top