• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

The Reason the Left Must Destroy the USA

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
“The extraordinary impact of the President-elect on the imagination of humanity is an important element in shaping a new world order.”
Henry Kissinger

http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/01/21/video-obamas-new-world-order-plans-revealed/


One World Globalist Government
The Reason the Left Must Destroy the USA
Sher Zieve Bio
Email Article
By Sher Zieve Friday, April 24, 2009

In order for global (AKA “one world”) government (AKA “rule”) to come into being, the United States of America must be destroyed. The USA and its Constitution are far too dangerous to the totalitarian Left for it to allow the country to continue its existence. For many years now, I have included in my Bio “if Leftists ran the country (and left to their own inane devices), it would be the end of the United States as a sovereign nation.” Unfortunately and tragically, I was—and still am—correct.

The United States Constitution is a document that was designed and implemented to severely restrict government interference and control over individual states and We-the-People. The current US Federal Administration—under the rule of Barack Obama—is now operating under its leaders’ stated agenda of redistributing wealth (which is taken from the middle class and “redistributed” to the US and Global political power elite) and establishing new laws to take the US Constitution from limiting control over the US population to total control over We-the-People. Thus far, with very few exceptions, not one of the ‘loyal opposition’ has truly tried to stop Obama. Instead, they seem to dutifully accept his programs that are tearing America apart—in favor of the global secular New World Order (NWO). This NWO will consist of—but not be limited to—the following for the USA:

* Massive energy tax increases of at least an additional $1,800/year/family
* Higher prices for all goods and services
* Total government control of the media (See Rosa Brooks “news” bail out proposal)
* Total government control of the entire financial industry (money will go to Obama and leftist supporters and be withheld from those who oppose them)
* The end of free speech (US state police have already been apprised by the Obama administration’s DHS Chief Napolitano that all who hold conservative or third party viewpoints are to be considered ‘enemies of the state’)
* Abortions on demand
* Infanticide for failed abortions (Note: Obama voted four times in opposition to a law that would have protected babies who are left to die after a failed abortion)
* Total government control of ALL industries Obama et al deem “essential” (which is subject to change at a moment’s notice)
* The end to small business unless it supports the Left
* The end of the middle class—as Obama and Co and the globalists will have gutted the country’s treasury and placed US taxpayer money in their own pockets
* The criminalization of all political thought that is deemed non-supportive of the Left
* The rescinding of Amendment 22 to end presidential term limits
* The prosecution of President George W. Bush for protecting the country against terrorists (in order to distract the masses from what Supreme Leader Obama and Co are really doing)
* The elevation of terrorists to a protected class (Islamists soon to be the global power elite’s Secret Police force?)
* Forced taxpayer funding for illegal immigrants
* The dismantling of the US’ southern border
* Major drug dealers covertly partnering with government

These are just a few of the stark horrors that are forthcoming—or have already arrived at our doorstep. Without a real revolution can they be stopped? You will need to answer that question for yourself.

Video Obama Redistribution of Wealth:
Obama on infanticide:
Napolitano’s conservative enemies:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/10527
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
What if the US Fed was replaced with a Global Fed, would that be good or bad?

By Dana Gabriel - BlackListedNews.com

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has been described as one of the enforcers of globalization. Nations who receive IMF assistance are often forced to surrender more sovereignty and further open up their borders to international banks and multinational corporations. Much of their wealth is then sucked dry by foreign predators with its resources and population essentially becoming the collateral for such financial aid. As a result of the global economic crisis, many more nations are having to turn to the IMF for help. At the recent G-20 Summit in London, the IMF’s role was expanded and its powers enhanced. There was little mention of its failed policies and its less then stellar record of effectively promoting development and democracy around the world. While some talk of reform, the IMF continues to rape the world, one poor nation at a time.

The IMF, along with the World Bank were established as financial sister institutions with both originating out of the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement. They are part of the United Nations system. The IMF was designed to help stabilize the post-World War II international financial system and is the framework for a central bank of issue. It provides short term financial assistance to nations that qualify, but this is at a very high price. These countries are placed in an economic straitjacket with the IMF and World Bank working in tandem, dictating large portions of public policy.

Some IMF conditions that countries have been forced to comply with can only be described as harsh and undemocratic. Often the devaluation of a nation’s currency has been a precondition for IMF assistance. In order to qualify for IMF loans, some nations have also been forced to lower tariffs, restrict governmental subsidies and spending, balance budgets, as well as sell-off state institutions to foreign interests. In some cases, the IMF has even prohibited wage increases as some countries have tried to do so, in order to compensate for a sharp rise in food prices and other commodities. Environmental and labor rights have also taken a hit as a result of IMF policies. Under the guise of helping economic distraught countries, the IMF is really bailing out foreign investors and multinational corporations. They have further fueled chaos and instability in some of the poorest regions in the world.

At the recent G-20 Summit, leaders pledged to boost the IMF’s financial resources to $750 billion. It will also assume a more central role in monitoring and regulating global markets, playing a key role in the design of a new financial system. The IMF’s power to create money has been activated and they will be able to issue up to $250 billion of new Special Drawing Rights (SDRs). Some countries are calling on SDRs to be used as a full reserve currency to challenge the dollar. In a recent article that appeared in the New American , William F. Jasper writes, “If the IMF is empowered with global monetary and financial regulatory powers, along with the ability to issue a global currency and bonds, it will no longer have to ask its member states for funding. Nor will the UN. The IMF will be able to provide the UN with the revenues it needs to become an actual world government.”

The IMF and World Bank will be holding meetings in Washington on April 25 and 26. On the agenda will be reform measures which could include changing some conditions attached to receiving emergency funds. They will also discuss how best to distribute the extra money they have been allocated. There is a sense that as part of IMF’s new role, it must also address the concerns of emerging economies who are suffering from the global recession. The IMF recently approved a $47 billion line of credit to Mexico who became the first G-20 country to apply for such assistance and may not be the last. There still exists a double standard which allows richer countries to use fiscal expansion in the face of recession while poorer nations are forced into stricter economic restraints.

The global elite envision a world without borders. They continue to push their agenda of global governance through the IMF, the World Bank, the United Nations, the WTO and trade deals such as NAFTA. It is our duty to resist the tyranny of globalization or face enslavement. In the end, national sovereignty must prevail—if we are to have any future.
 
Top