• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

The Top Three Reasons Why Liberals Hate Conservatives

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Reason #1: Utopianism
You’re in their way

Strip everything away, and the fundamental trait of all leftists is this: The believe that through the state, they can build paradise on earth. They believe that with enough tinkering, coercion, and rule by “experts,” they can eliminate all hard choices and competing goods, perfect human nature, and bring all good things to all people.

To someone of the political right—defined by our belief in human freedom, private solutions, and individual sovereignty—this is just the modern re-telling of the age-old story: that some men should rule over other men. Ancient despotism, monarchy, fascism, totalitarianism, modern progressivism—they’re all just different flavors, and different degrees of application, of the same basic philosophy. But the person on the left does not see it that way. He wants perfection. He believes it is possible. And by gum, he’s going to get it.

This utopian thinking quickly leads to an unavoidable conclusion, echoed from the French Revolution to Lenin and Stalin to Mao to the Progressives of the modern era: “On ne fait pas d’omelet sans casser des oeufs.” (You can’t make an omelet without breaking some eggs.) To the utopian statist, “process costs” are entirely acceptable. They are building paradise, after all.

That’s why you see so much more toleration by the left’s rank and file of corruption and bad behavior by their leaders. What’s a little lying here, a little corruption there? They are building paradise. What’s a little cheating in the face of all they intend to accomplish?

That is also why you see such a prevalence of cult-of-personality adulation for strong leaders. Strong leaders resolve contradictions and sweep away the opposition. Strong leaders have the will to get the job done. Strong leaders get the trains running on time. Next stop, paradise.

But most importantly . . . these utopians—both the leaders and the rank and file—are so convinced of the nobility of their intentions that they believe that anyone who stands in their way must, by definition, have evil intentions. After all, who but a monster would stand in the way of paradise? And what consideration do monsters deserve? Why none at all, of course—they’re monsters.

That is why they do not simply disagree with you. That is why they calumniate you and attribute the worst motives to you. That is why they hate you.


Reason #2: Utopianism

The WORLD is in their way

The world refuses to conform to their utopian vision. The world isn’t the neat and tidy place they want it to be. They still hold onto the childlike belief that there can be goods with no tradeoffs, and this world of endless tradeoffs proves them wrong every day, mocking their childishness in the process. That makes them very angry.

Someone once said, “Conservatives believe what they see; liberals see what they believe.” Leftists hate you for the fact that you see the world as it is, rather than as it should be. You accept the facts of reality as they truly are, and you try to make the best of it. They believe that they can make reality conform to their vision of it. (That this effort always requires massive application of force against other human beings doesn’t bother them. It’s just another process cost.)

Your acceptance of reality as it is is pedestrian and troglodytic. Their vision of how reality should be makes them noble and romantic. They hate you for not living in the same fantasy land that they do. They hate you for recognizing that life is filled with tradeoffs. They don’t see the tradeoffs, so when you point them out, it’s as if you are the one that is making the tradeoff exist. La-La-La . . . I can’t hear you! Stop making bad things happen.

Your acceptance of reality makes them so angry, in fact, that they have convinced themselves that you must be suffering from some sort of psychological malady. Over the last century, dozens of self-reinforcing junk-science books and studies have been published labeling “conservatism” (once called “classical liberalism”) as a mental disorder. Like the mental patient permanently lost in a psychotic world of his own creation . . . he’s normal, it’s the rest of you who are nuts.


Reason #3: Preening Narcissism
They are beautiful, so you must be ugly

The ideas of the political left produce failure at best and misery, oppression, and democide at worst. In spite of this, I had long clung to the belief that at least people on the political left “mean well.”

But do they? Or do they simply want to feel as though they mean well?

Author Robert Bidinotto asks (and answers) the same question:

Have decades upon decades of liberal policy failures deterred liberals from being liberals? Have the trillions of dollars blown on welfare-state programs since the “New Deal” and the “War on Poverty” made a damned bit of difference in curing poverty? And has that failure convinced “progressives” that there is something fundamentally wrong in their worldview and approach? Have the horrendous historical consequences of appeasement policies stopped today’s politicians from appeasing international thugs and terrorists? No?

Then why does anyone assume that liberals gauge the value of their worldview by the standard of its PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES?

Practical consequences are ALWAYS trumped by the advancement and protection of one’s core Narrative: the fairy tale that gives one’s life meaning, coherence, and moral justification. [ . . . ]

Doing that makes them feel good about themselves. And they would far rather feel good about themselves than actually achieve any of their stated practical objectives. It’s not about the objectives at all. It’s about THEM.

John Hawkins is just as unequivocal:

3) Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results. Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it’s designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn’t work and wastes billions. A ban on DDT makes liberals feel good about themselves because they’re “protecting the environment” even though millions of people have died as a result. For liberals, it’s not what a program does in the real world; it’s about whether they feel better about themselves for supporting it.

If this is true, then for many, utopianism isn’t about what they think they can achieve, it’s about their own self-image.

http://www.westernfreepress.com/2014/09/21/the-top-three-reasons-why-liberals-hate-conservatives/
 

Brad S

Well-known member
Wow, liarjoe dissected the hell outta that.

In reason 1, and why liberals abide corruption in there elected officials; I'd never thought of that. Conversely, conservatives revile corruption, on their guys the most.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Brad S said:
Wow, liarjoe dissected the hell outta that.

In reason 1, and why liberals abide corruption in there elected officials; I'd never thought of that. Conversely, conservatives revile corruption, on their guys the most.

Yep- once they get that (R) by their name they are pure as the driven snow ... :roll: :wink: :lol:

littlejoe- you just hit the nail on the head when you called it crap... Only a virgin to politics who wore rose colored glasses and thought they were walking down the yellow brick road would start thinking corruption only sits with one party... And it does make them look like a dope...

September 30, 2014, 05:31 pm
Ethics panel: ‘Substantial reason’ to believe Rep. Petri broke rules

By Mario Trujillo


The Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) determined there is "substantial reason to believe" Rep. Tom Petri (R-Wis.) violated House rules by "improperly" using his office to benefit two companies in which he owns hundreds of thousands of dollars in stock.

The independent panel recommended the House Ethics Committee investigate further in a 37-page report that was made public Tuesday.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Rep. Petri's Liberal Action Score:

http://thatsmycongress.com/house/repPetriWI6112.html


Maybe your problem OT, is that you still don't know the difference between a liberal and a conservative...

...here's a hint "Republican" does not equate to Conservative.

and voting for obama didn't end the warmongering, or crony capitalism...did it?
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
37 percent of Democrats running for Congress don't even bring up the subject of Obamacare, President Barack Obama's signature health care reform law

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/democrat-candidates-obamacare-aca/2014/09/30/id/597814/#ixzz3Es2qcelL
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
 

Brad S

Well-known member
OT and liarjoe, a consortium of deeply flawed character.

It comes down to nixons party insisted he resign for the well being of America. Klinton and obamas party make excuses every day. They'd both been removed one way or another.
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
It does seem, though, that most of the time when a libtard is caught redhanded doing something illegal, immoral, or just plain wrong, he or she is given a pass, by the party and the media, whereas a conservative will be crucified, whether there is any proof of guilt or not.
 

Latest posts

Top