• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

this sickens me

jigs

Well-known member
ronieism ? returning favors? or just plain old corruption?? this is a prime example of how this couple is BAD for AMERICA.

Total Personal Staff members for other first ladies paid by taxpayers:

Mamie Eisenhower: One-- paid for personally out of President's salary.
Jackie Kennedy: One
Roseline Carter: One
Barbara Bush: One
Hilary Clinton: Three
Laura Bush: One
Michele Obama: Twenty-two


How things have changed! If you're one of the tens of millions of Americans facing certain destitution, earning less than subsistence wages stocking the shelves at Wal-Mart or serving up McDonald cheeseburgers,prepare to scream and then come to realize that the benefit package for these servants of Ms Michelle are the same as members of the national security and defense departments and the bill for these assorted lackeys is paid by YOU, John Q. Public:

Michele Obama's personal staff:

One.. $172,200 - Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff)
Two.. $140,000 - Frye, Jocelyn C. (Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Policy And Projects For The First Lady)
Three.. $113,000 - Rogers, Desiree G. (Special Assistant to the President and White House Social Secretary for Mrs. Obama)
Four.. $102,000 - Johnston, Camille Y. (Special Assistant to the President
and Director of Communications for the First Lady)
Five.. $100,000 - Winter, Melissa (Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
Six.. $90,000 Medina , David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
Seven.. $84,000 - Lilyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press Secretary to the First Lady)
Eight.. $75,000 - Starkey, Frances M. (Director of Scheduling and Advance for the First Lady)
Nine.. $70,000 - Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy and Project for the First Lady)
Ten.. $65,000 - Burnough, Erinn (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)
Eleven.. $64,000 - Reinstein, Joseph B.(Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)
Twelve.. $62,000 - Goodman, Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of Scheduling and Events Coordinator For The First Lady)
Thirteen.. $60,000 Fitz, Alan O.(Deputy Director of Advance and Trip Director
for the First Lady)
Fourteen... $57,500 - Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and Personal Aide to the First Lady)
Fifteen... $52,500 - Mustaphi, Semonti M. (Associate Director and Deputy Press Secretary To The First Lady)
Sixteen... $50,000 - Jarvis, Kristen E. (Special Assistant for Scheduling and Traveling Aide To The First Lady)
Seventeen.. $45,000 - Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director of Correspondence For The First Lady)
Eighteen.. $43,000 - Tubman, Samanth a (Deputy Associate Director, Social Office)
Nineteen.. $40,000 - Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
Twenty.. $36,000 - Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the Social Secretary)
Twenty-One.. $35,000 - Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant)
Twenty-Two.. $35,000 - Jackson, Deilia A. (Deputy Associate Director of Correspondence for the First Lady)
(total $1,591,200 in annual salaries)
 

Steve

Well-known member
jigs said:
perhaps it is time we peasants shove her crown up her arse!

yep.. I've had enough "cake" lately.. and my bread isn't going as far as it used to..

but a peasant revolt.. ?

a "tea party" perhaps might get the elitists attention.. but would they listen?
 

jigs

Well-known member
I like how they keep trying to brush the tea party deal under the rug...eventually they will see that this is not just a passing fancy!
 

jingo2

Well-known member
The Tea Party Party sure wasn't for the commoon working man...

It cost about $500 to attend and then another $300+ if you wanted to see Sarah.

Plus you had your travel expense and hotel...and they stayed @ the best place.


Seems that's going to be a party for those ' that have' also.... so where's the change in that?
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
There's plenty of other tea parties around that are free to the working man. But somebody is carrying the tab.

As far as the excessive nickels go, people spend more to go to the Oscars for less.
 

Steve

Well-known member
jingo2 said:
The Tea Party Party sure wasn't for the commoon working man...

It cost about $500 to attend and then another $300+ if you wanted to see Sarah.

Plus you had your travel expense and hotel...and they stayed @ the best place.


Seems that's going to be a party for those ' that have' also.... so where's the change in that?

I actually agree on this one... the grassroots movement has been hijacked at the top leadership.. ,

and only by forcing and focusing on conservative values will it make any change at all..



so until an real (grassroots) movement is formed.. I'll stick with the conservative Republicans, tea party grassroots organizers, and moderate democrats.. becuase we can all clearly see the alternative of supporting Obama's failed "change" message... is the real disaster..
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
jingo2 said:
The Tea Party Party sure wasn't for the commoon working man...

It cost about $500 to attend and then another $300+ if you wanted to see Sarah.

Plus you had your travel expense and hotel...and they stayed @ the best place.


Seems that's going to be a party for those ' that have' also.... so where's the change in that?

Maybe the unions could get involved. I heard they are for the "common working man"
 

Steve

Well-known member
backhoeboogie said:
There's plenty of other tea parties around that are free to the working man. But somebody is carrying the tab.

As far as the excessive nickels go, people spend more to go to the Oscars for less.

our local tea parties are "free" and grass root supported.. and few really liked the ideas from the so called national leadership..
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
Steve said:
backhoeboogie said:
There's plenty of other tea parties around that are free to the working man. But somebody is carrying the tab.

As far as the excessive nickels go, people spend more to go to the Oscars for less.

our local tea parties are "free" and grass root supported.. and few really liked the ideas from the so called national leadership..

Here, there's way too many bent of Texas leaving the U.S. at those type of tea parties. Some are trying to downplay it while some politicians aren't truly interested but want the voter support.

The Dems jumping on the independant Texas bandwagon are getting negatives. You gotta remember that we didn't vote for Obama, we won't, and we know that's just more reason for him to be agin us. As well as DC.

There's too much turmoil at the moment. Something is going to blow open sooner or later. The press can keep denying it until then.
 

katrina

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
jingo2 said:
The Tea Party Party sure wasn't for the commoon working man...

It cost about $500 to attend and then another $300+ if you wanted to see Sarah.

Plus you had your travel expense and hotel...and they stayed @ the best place.


Seems that's going to be a party for those ' that have' also.... so where's the change in that?

Maybe the unions could get involved. I heard they are for the "common working man"

My guess is they needed to pay some bills for the convention.. Maybe they need a little dough for ads later on...
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
katrina said:
hypocritexposer said:
jingo2 said:
The Tea Party Party sure wasn't for the commoon working man...

It cost about $500 to attend and then another $300+ if you wanted to see Sarah.

Plus you had your travel expense and hotel...and they stayed @ the best place.


Seems that's going to be a party for those ' that have' also.... so where's the change in that?

Maybe the unions could get involved. I heard they are for the "common working man"

My guess is they needed to pay some bills for the convention.. Maybe they need a little dough for ads later on...

The Muslims sure filled Obama's coffers. He's way ahead of the game.
 
Top