• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Tommy Henderson vs the BLM

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
What makes him different? He too lost in Federal court. The fact that he hasn't utilized the land in 30 years without fighting for it would likely not bode well for him.
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
Big Muddy rancher said:
He payed for it and has a Texas Deed. :?

Yep, and that didn't matter to the feds or the court- taking private property is now Constituational. He now needs to follow the law and go away. Anyone that agrees with him just supports anarchy. Probably skin heads. I bet he has said something racist in the past.

What is the difference in the feds taking land vs taking money/income (personal property) from one family to give to another? Or simply place it in the control of the federal government?

I imagine that there are at least 40 million people without land. If a state land exchange is created, we can probably get those 40 million people their own land. It is the right thing to do and we know it is Constitutional.
 

Big Muddy rancher

Well-known member
iwannabeacowboy said:
Big Muddy rancher said:
He payed for it and has a Texas Deed. :?

Yep, and that didn't matter to the feds or the court- taking private property is now Constituational. He now needs to follow the law and go away. Anyone that agrees with him just supports anarchy. Probably skin heads. I bet he has said something racist in the past.

What is the difference in the feds taking land vs taking money/income (personal property) from one family to give to another? Or simply place it in the control of the federal government?

I imagine that there are at least 40 million people without land. If a state land exchange is created, we can probably get those 40 million people their own land. It is the right thing to do and we know it is Constitutional.

Why is he not getting the support?

Not militant enough?
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
Big Muddy rancher said:
iwannabeacowboy said:
Big Muddy rancher said:
He payed for it and has a Texas Deed. :?

Yep, and that didn't matter to the feds or the court- taking private property is now Constituational. He now needs to follow the law and go away. Anyone that agrees with him just supports anarchy. Probably skin heads. I bet he has said something racist in the past.

What is the difference in the feds taking land vs taking money/income (personal property) from one family to give to another? Or simply place it in the control of the federal government?

I imagine that there are at least 40 million people without land. If a state land exchange is created, we can probably get those 40 million people their own land. It is the right thing to do and we know it is Constitutional.

Why is he not getting the support?

Not militant enough?

He lost a long time ago- 30 years and it was prior to the internet- so why didn't the national media make it a bigger story? How much did you hear in the media about Bundy prior to this resistance? What about Hage- it was in 91, how much did you hear about it outside of the internet?
 
Top