Big Muddy rancher
Well-known member
http://www.inquisitr.com/1211766/blm-claims-90000-acres-does-not-belong-to-texas-attempts-to-seize-ranch/
This guy has a case. :?
This guy has a case. :?
Big Muddy rancher said:He payed for it and has a Texas Deed. :?
iwannabeacowboy said:Big Muddy rancher said:He payed for it and has a Texas Deed. :?
Yep, and that didn't matter to the feds or the court- taking private property is now Constituational. He now needs to follow the law and go away. Anyone that agrees with him just supports anarchy. Probably skin heads. I bet he has said something racist in the past.
What is the difference in the feds taking land vs taking money/income (personal property) from one family to give to another? Or simply place it in the control of the federal government?
I imagine that there are at least 40 million people without land. If a state land exchange is created, we can probably get those 40 million people their own land. It is the right thing to do and we know it is Constitutional.
Big Muddy rancher said:iwannabeacowboy said:Big Muddy rancher said:He payed for it and has a Texas Deed. :?
Yep, and that didn't matter to the feds or the court- taking private property is now Constituational. He now needs to follow the law and go away. Anyone that agrees with him just supports anarchy. Probably skin heads. I bet he has said something racist in the past.
What is the difference in the feds taking land vs taking money/income (personal property) from one family to give to another? Or simply place it in the control of the federal government?
I imagine that there are at least 40 million people without land. If a state land exchange is created, we can probably get those 40 million people their own land. It is the right thing to do and we know it is Constitutional.
Why is he not getting the support?
Not militant enough?