Texan
Well-known member
Here's the 'complete' Obama/Craig report:
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/politics/Contacts_Memo.pdf
What a joke.
Something I found VERY interesting, though.
So...the Governor's office had heard from others - apparently claiming to speak for Obama - but Craig's report doesn't mention anybody other than Emanuel that admits to communicating with the Governor's office.
In fact, doesn't it explicitly deny contacts by all of the parties included in the report other than Emanuel?
Why is there no mention of who these "others" might be?
Not even President yet, and the Obama team is already involved in shady, sleazy coverups, hiding from the press, etc. Transparency? Change?
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/politics/Contacts_Memo.pdf
What a joke.
Something I found VERY interesting, though.
Deputy Governor Louanner Peters called him at his office and left a message. When he returned the call, Ms. Peters asked who spoke for the President-Elect with respect to the Senate appointment. She explained that the Governor’s office had heard from others with recommendations about the vacant seat. She stated that the Governor’s office wanted to know who, if anyone, had the authority to speak for the President-Elect. Dr. Whitaker said he would find out.
So...the Governor's office had heard from others - apparently claiming to speak for Obama - but Craig's report doesn't mention anybody other than Emanuel that admits to communicating with the Governor's office.
In fact, doesn't it explicitly deny contacts by all of the parties included in the report other than Emanuel?
Why is there no mention of who these "others" might be?
Not even President yet, and the Obama team is already involved in shady, sleazy coverups, hiding from the press, etc. Transparency? Change?