• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Trey Gowdy grills James Comey

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
Gowdy is a putz. If he actually were going to grill him, he would have asked him what he aluded to in the end. He didn't make him answer. He said, i hope you can explain today.... why not just simply ask the man sitting directly in front of you infront of the microphone to explain?

Gowdy is nothing like he pretends to be. He's like a little yaping dog that yaps just to feel his butt wiggle.
 

burnt

Well-known member
It gets no clearer than Trey Gowdy made it.

There are two levels of compliance to law and order - one for the important folks and one for the little people who sometimes get caught driving too fast...

It's a mighty sick world we live in.

Our leadership has fallen to the levels we once ascribed to 3rd world countries - corrupt, greedy and without conscience.
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
I still wish he had asked Comey why he let her go. I mean, face to face, I wish Gowdy would have asked him.

All those questions that Gowdy asked that Hillary testified to as being true, that Comey said were 'not true'......how could he do nothing? Will we ever know? Sad, sad day.
 

Mike

Well-known member
This whole thing should have been handled differently. A Grand Jury should have been the decider of whether there would be charges.
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
Especially in light of this:

Remember Whitewater? 20 years ago James Comey as an attorney on the Senate Whitewater Investigation was looking into the conduct of President Bill Clinton and first lady Hillary Clinton.The investigation was to determine whether Bill Clinton used his political position as governor of Arkansas (in the 1980s) to push through an illegal loan to benefit Bill and Hillary's business partner in Whitewater. Several
people involved in Whitewater went to jail, but no criminal prosecution was in the cards for Bill and Hillary. Remember James Comey was the Deputy Special Counsel for the Whitewater investigation....In Christopher Anderson's book, American Evita: Hillary Clinton's Rise to Power, Anderson gives details of the New Square offenders pardon by Bill Clinton (who had been convicted of bilking the government of $30 million dollars). Christopher Anderson relates that at Hillary's urging Bill gave clemency to 16 Puerto Rican terrorists who took the lives of 16 Americans and wounded many others.Anderson tell us that Hillary admired the Marxist Carl Oglesby and Saul Alinsky. It is from her admiration for Saul Alinsky that she formed her belief that "the only way to make a real difference is to acquire power." The pardon of billionaire Marc Rich (who traded illegally with America's enemies including Iran) by President Bill Clinton was something that everyone knew reeked of impropriety after learning that Rich's wife donated $450,000 to the Clinton Library. Again James Comey oversaw investigations of the pardon matters as well. Unbelievably James Comey did not recommend charging the Clinton in any of these matters. Wouldn't it be fair and balanced to give news coverage to these facts?
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
That's real interesting FH.

Hind site, and without that knowledge FH, my spidy senses have been set off by Comey numerous times. It's just one of those things you feel once you've seen the corrupt maneuvers that know no bounds of the Obama administration. I don't believe that Obama could have predicted this type of investigation at the time of his appointment of Comey. But just that Comey would be pliable to his desires. Either through his own person, or through limitations by having the DOJ completely under Obama's will. At what point in time has Obama appointed anyone that is not corruptible? Which leads my belief toward the former. Name a position that he has appointed that has actually been a person above reproach. A person of ethics and truly non-partisan? There hasn't been. It would be hard to believe that Comey is the odd one out.

What also caused unease with me is that every time the media mentions Comey, it prefaced him with the talking point of being republican. Comey, a republican.... As Obama's talking points constantly repeat, they go beyond ordinary measures to not give the "appearance" of corruption.

When the democrats did not label Comey's investigation as partisan... that was concerning to me (calling him republican to give him credence but not partisan). Had they thought that he was going to give a damning suggestion of recommending indictment, you know good and well that they would have been slandering him 24 hours a day in the media. They weren't. The Benghazi investigation was labeled partisan, the FBI investigation was not.

i.e. "Unlike the Benghazi investigation that is led by congressional Republicans, the investigation of Clinton’s non-secure, homebrew e-mail system has been run by intelligence community inspectors-general and the FBI — i.e., by Obama political appointees and non-partisan, career law-enforcement agents."

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/430852/jason-chaffetz-hillary-clinton-e-mails-fbi-should-investigate-not-congress


When it was reported that democrats thought him to be a fair and nonpartisan investigator, that should cue everyone to the fact that they are either not fair and nonpartisan, or that the outcome has already been arranged. Because no democrat will give support to a fair and nonpartisan investigator.


Eternity is going to be a very long, long time for these people.
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
Good points, Traveler. And you are right about eternity.

On facebook one post said something like, "has Hillary already won the election and we don't know it?" (posted in light of the string of events....Bill Clinton meeting Lynch in the plane; followed closely by the FBI verdict; Clinton campaigning with Obama, etc.) How could that all be coincidence?
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
Faster horses said:
I still wish he had asked Comey why he let her go. I mean, face to face, I wish Gowdy would have asked him.

Exactly. Why not?

Gowdy didn't make a single point that hasn't already been made in the media. One that hasn't been made by the FBI director already himself. He used more lengthy wording, but it was already laid out for anyone to put in more concise wording.

What Comey did not say and still has not said, is the reasoning why Hillary was deemed to not have been indictable. I'd like to hear a detailed questioning of that. Not some show to act like you're asking hard questions, when the answers were given yesterday. Nothing.. nothing in the answers changed.

But they sure haven't answered why.

Complicit. These non-patriot power hungry republicans are simply complicit.
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
Faster horses said:
Good points, Traveler. And you are right about eternity.

On facebook one post said something like, "has Hillary already won the election and we don't know it?" (posted in light of the string of events....Bill Clinton meeting Lynch in the plane; followed closely by the FBI verdict; Clinton campaigning with Obama, etc.) How could that all be coincidence?

Well, we know that the Virginia penitentiaries will be voting for her. California illegals with their state issued ID's will be voting for her. The flood of muslims purposely spread throughout the US will be voting for her. The deceased, the dogs, and the people who have been signed up without their knowledge will be voting for her. And any "unavoidable" glitches in the electronic voting will be steered her way.

I don't know if the entirety of the situation could have already been fixed to the point of her winning, but everything possible will have been done to do so. If the US government can bring regime change to multiple countries- Ukraine, Libya, Egypt, Syria... why can similar tactics not be utilized here?

The power of our Federal government is dangerous.
 
Top