mwj, I am sorry I didn't see what you were saying as it was in my quotes.
mwj:"
Econ you were saying that it was not a primary test for the virus that it was a secondary test of materials(fat) that was used to test for residue of drug use. My point is that would be using materials already on hand from something totally unrelated to draw conclusions instead of m
taking a specific sample. "
Yes you are right, they would be using materials already on hand. Samples can be used for more than one thing. I guess my point is that the evidence in the operation will be seen before the test results are in unless the disease had a long incubation time period. By that time the farmer may have already caught it and his family as well if it was a human transferrence variation of the bird flu.
mwj:"
Econ you were saying that it was not a primary test for the virus that it was a secondary test of materials(fat) that was used to test for residue of drug use. My point is that would be using materials already on hand from something totally unrelated to draw conclusions instead of m
taking a specific sample. "
Yes you are right, they would be using materials already on hand. Samples can be used for more than one thing. I guess my point is that the evidence in the operation will be seen before the test results are in unless the disease had a long incubation time period. By that time the farmer may have already caught it and his family as well if it was a human transferrence variation of the bird flu.
