Big Muddy rancher said:
hypocritexposer said:
Big Muddy rancher said:
I'm no middle east expert by any means but from All reports Qaddafi is a murderous brute that has helped kill Americans.
Yes, I agree, but if you are going to help overthrow him, you better be sure that the new regime is not going to be worse.
One of the stated goals of the backers (terrorists) of these "rebels" in countries like Libya, Egypt and the other Middle East countries is to place people in power that will go to war with Israel and the US.
Why did Obama throw Mubaric under the bus then let Quaddafi retain power?
Mubaric at least had a working peace treaty with Israel.
IMO, he didn't treat either situation any differently, until now, when it looks like Gadhafi is gaining the upper hand. Up until now, it looked like the "popular uprising" would accomplish the same result as in Egypt, without what would look like meddling by the US. The bus that's about to hit Gadhafi is going to leave a mark.
In the end, it will be the same result...
I believe the Muslim Brotherhood are stirring up these revolts, so they can better deliver on their religious obligation to kill infidels.
They will soon have access to the money and weapons of another country.
In the last couple of years they have gained the resources of Turkey, Egypt, and soon Libya.
If you take a closer look at who is backing the "rebels", I think the picture becomes clearer.
Which countries are arming the "rebels" with weapons?
I don't understand it completely either, but something tells me that when the US is backing Saudi intervention that is killing "rebels" in Bahrain, but helping the "rebels" in Libya, something else is at work. And it's not for Humanitarian reasons.