• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

United Nations and its Goals

Is the United Nations Ruining the USA?

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I don't care if they do or not

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .

MoGal

Well-known member
http://www.crossroad.to/Excerpts/chronologies/un.htm

The roots of the United Nations -- the most visible part of the new global management system -- might be compared to the many deep and spreading roots of a tenacious vine. Some of the root stems are short and shallow. Others are long and deep, firmly imbedded in powerful social, political and financial institutions in Europe and North America, which -- for various reasons -- shared Lord Tennyson's vision of a "federation of the world."



The tangled roots of this vine spread beneath the surface of public life until 1945, when delegates from 50 countries met in San Francisco to sign the UN Charter. Communist spy, Alger Hiss, co-authored that founding charter and served as the first UN Secretary-General. [more] This initial glimpse of the sprouting vine should have raised a big red flag. But our war-torn world was already blinded by the well-publicized vision of a peaceable planet "lapt in universal law." Who dared oppose such a noble purpose?



Actually, many Americans did see the sign posts along the way, but their warnings were drowned out by the mainstream media's resounding praise. Small wonder! The 25 main U.S. newspapers had been bought by the banking goliath, J. P. Morgan -- one of the stronger stems in the vine's tangled root system.



The young vine grew fast and its branches spread throughout the world. The signs of political and social compromise multiplied. It was no secret that each consecutive socialist Secretary General -- Trygve Lie (Norway), Dag Hammersjold (Sweden), U Thant (Burma), Kurt Waldheim (Austria), etc. -- sympathized with Communism and helped build an imposing web of international declarations and treaties ("soft" laws) that would overrule constitutional rights and domestic laws in America.



Less known is the fact that only Communist leaders would fill the UN's highest military post, Under-Secretary-General for Political and Security Council Affairs. Fourteen of the fifteen men who held this vital post up until 1995 (and probably into the new century[2]) represented the USSR. The one exception was Dragoslav Protitich, a Communist from Yugoslavia. So when American soldiers fought Communism in Korea and Vietnam in partnership with the UN, the top UN military leaders were Communists. No wonder American soldier fought two futile and deadly wars.[2]




How could the public be so deceived? Part of the answer lies in subtle power of gradualism -- the incremental steps that function like the proverbial frog in the pot of slow-heating water. You become so used to gradual change that you hardly notice the next step.

Just as important is the grand vision of global peace and unity, which burns in the heart of many idealists who have learned to hate war. These two -- vision and gradualism -- serve to both motivate and deceive the masses at the same time. Of course, the leaders who utilize these strategies have other goals in mind.

The quest for global peace and unity began long for Alfred Lord Tennyson penned his visionary poem, Locksley Hall. History points to monumental feats such as the Tower of Babel, the vast Hittite, Babylonian and Persian civilizations and, later, the Greek, Roman, Byzantine and Muslim empires. In more modern times the world watched with awe as "civilized" nations such as Russia and Germany sacrificed personal freedom and millions of lives on their altars to Soviet and Nazi dreams of totalitarian socialism.

Hindsight helps us trace the early, incremental steps toward a world government, and we can now look back at a foundation laid by an eclectic blend of socialist visionaries, global-minded financiers, communist revolutionaries, secret societies, New Age leaders, wealthy capitalist and tax-exempt foundations primarily in Great Britain and the USA. Long before the United Nations became an official organ under socialist leadership, that early vision had spread through all the main institutions of the Western world: education (especially universities), government, health systems, civil society, churches.... Like an invasive vine in a tropical rain forest, its unseen roots crept everywhere. Marilyn Ferguson, in her 1980 book, The Aquarian Conspiracy, summarized its nature well:

"Broader than reform, deeper than revolution, this benign conspiracy for a new human agenda has triggered the most rapid cultural realignment in history.... There are legions of conspirators. They are in corporations, universities and hospitals, on the faculties of public schools, in factories and doctors' offices, in state and federal agencies, on city councils and the White House staff, in state legislatures, in volunteer organizations, in virtually all arenas of policy-making in the country.... They have coalesced into small groups in every town and institution." pages 23-24

To fulfill this dream of a New World Order that would serve the grandiose economic and social interests of its early visionaries, two steps were essential:

Establish an efficient global management system that would join the nations of the world through processes that would appear "democratic" and would produce compliance with specific sets of goals and standards.

Use this management system to mold minds, undermine sovereignty, establish social solidarity and train a mobile global workforce through --

The redistribution of human and financial resources (migration, a global economy and a global welfare system).

A uniform worldwide education system that would standardize both social "learning" and work skills everywhere.

Control of the mainstream media and other propaganda channels. Professor Carrol Quigley wrote in Tragedy and Hope, "There grew up in the 20th century a power structure between London and New York which penetrated deeply into university life, the press, and the practice of foreign policy. The American branch of this 'English Establishment' exerted much of its influence through five American newspapers (New York Times and Herald Tribune, Christian Science Monitor, Washington Post...). Quigley, 953

A supportive "civil society" (including business, community groups, the news and entertainment media, churches, etc) prepared to lead the masses toward cultural and religious synthesis in communities and organizations around the world using the dialectic process -- a strategy well tested and proven in the former Soviet Union. (Many participants -- including churches -- may never know how their new business practices and small group dialogues help undermine traditional values and prepare their members for the new global society.)

To the pragmatic prophets and pied pipers behind this scheme, the loss of lives, property and freedom mattered little, for the utopian end would justify their unscrupulous means. Social experiments that killed millions in Russia, Nazi Germany and China became useful stepping stones for the wealthy foundations and financiers in the UK and US who helped fund those wars and revolutions -- and for the powerful leaders (in the UK and USA) who provided weapons and technology for both allies and supposed enemies.




At this point in this revolutionary "progression," President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair, like Kofi Annan, serve well as visible and elected representatives for behind-the-scenes masters who have already mapped the basic course (if not all the details). Behind the visible Kofi Annan stand Maurice Strong and other power brokers. And behind George W. Bush stand "wise" insiders who have been guiding change for decades. Some of the current names are familiar: George Shultz, David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Henry Kissinger, Brent Scowcroft.... These men, all members of the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) serve in presidents' cabinets again and again -- or work silently behind the scenes. They may call themselves Republican or Democrats; it doesn't really matter.

Few have done more to expose this revolutionary agenda than Carrol Quigley, the history professor at the Foreign Service Schools of Georgetown University whom Clinton honored in his acceptance speech at the Democratic Convention, July 16, 1992. [See Quigley's credentials] In his 1300-page tome, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, he wrote:

"The chief problem of American political life for a long time has been how to make the two Congressional parties more national and international. The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so the that American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy." Quigley, 1247-1248

In other words, elected officials come and go, but the unelected leaders behind the scenes continue their reign.

Summarizing a key point in Tragedy and Hope, Dr. Stanley Monteith wrote in his well researched book, Brotherhood of Darkness: "Professor Quigley assured his readers that the threat of communism was exaggerated, and that he had researched the men and the organizations that rule the world. In those days many people believed that our State Department had turned Eastern Europe and China over to the communist because our government was dominated by subversive agents." Professor Quigley clarified that confusion:

"This myth, like all fables, does in fact have a modicum of truth. There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent in the way the radical Right believes the Communist act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operation of this network because I have studied it for twenty years, and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records." Quigley, 950

"One of Professor Quigley's most shocking revelations," wrote Dr. Monteith, "was the fact that the American Communist Party was partly financed by J. P. Morgan and Company.... J. P. Morgan and his associates financed the Republican Party, the Democratic Party, conservative groups, liberal organizations, communist groups and anti-communist organizations. Thus we should not be surprised to learn that someone purchased Professor Quigley's publisher and destroyed the plates to the first half of his book so it couldn't be reprinted."[1, page 99-100]

The CFR would become the U.S. equivalent to the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) in Great Britain. Professor Quigley explains:

"At the end of the war of 1914, it became clear that the organization of this system had to be greatly extended... the tasks was entrusted to Lionel Curtis who established, in England and each dominion, a front organization to the existing local Round Table Group. This front organization called the Royal Institute of International Affairs, had as its nucleus in each area the existing submerged Round Table Group. In New York it was known as the Council on Foreign Relations, and was a front for J. P. Morgan and Company.... In fact, the original plans for the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations were drawn up at Paris." Quigley, 951-952.


Banks and tax-exempt foundations were essential to this global vision :


"The powers of financial capitalism has another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole....


"The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Bale, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank... sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards...." Quigley, 324

"In 1924, the chairman of the board of the Midland Bank said, "...banks can and do create money... And they who control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Government and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people." Quigley, 325

"During the early decades of the 20th century," explained Dr. Monteith, "the three largest banks in the US were owned by the Rockefellers, the Morgan's, and the Mellon's." Contrary to popular speculations, the powerful European central banks preceded the House of Rothschild. Jewish banks "never controlled the financial institutions of the world." [1, page 35] Quigley, 50-62



There you have a glimpse into the hidden Anglo-American power structure and its European branches. To see how all the pieces fit together, we suggest you read Brotherhood of Darkness [800-544-8927] by Dr. Stan Monteith. Many of the quotes below are taken (with permission) from his book.
 

MoGal

Well-known member
While I realize some of you may not be interested in clicking on the link, here's some of the years and accomplishments ......... one has to start putting the pieces of the puzzle together.... the trilateral commission, Bilderburg group, Council of Foreign Relations, Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, are VEINS of the United Nations and their goal.

1917. Dr. Monteith wrote that "J. P. Morgan and his associates controlled twenty five of our most influential newspapers. The atrocity stories [about the war] were designed to raise public support of American entry into World War 1" -- an essential step toward public acceptance of a world government. According to the Congressional Record (2-17-1917),


"...the J.P. Morgan [banking] interests.... and their subsidiary organizations got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the US.... They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. ... an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information...."[1, page 9]


(do you wonder why GE and Murdoch own the newspapers, tv and radio stations now??)
---------
1917. In its report published in 1954, the Reece Committee (the Special House Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations) explained and quoted the official minutes of the Board of Trustees of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace:

"These trustees in a meeting about 1917 had the brashness to congratulate themselves on the wisdom of their original decision because already the impact of war had indicated it... could alter life in this country. ... they even had the brashness to ... dispatch a telegram to Mr. Wilson, cautioning him to see that the war did not end too quickly....

"The concern became, as expressed by the trustees, seeing to it that there was no reversion to life in this country as it existed prior to 1914. And they came to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, they must control education. and then they approached the Rockefeller Foundation and they said, 'Will you take on the acquisition of control of education as it involves subjects that re domestic in their significance? We'll take on the basis of subjects that have an international significance..' And it was agreed.... They decided the key to is the teaching of American history, and they must change that." [The Tax-Exempt Foundations, p. 60-61]

(do you wonder what is wrong with our school system and the teaching of children??)
--------------------
1925. The International Bureau of Education was founded with a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation. It later became part of UNESCO.[1] Cuddy, page 15.


1931 (November). Arnold Toynbee delivers a speech to the institute for the Study of the International Affairs at Copenhagen in which he explains,


"We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local nation states of the world is still a heresy for which as statesman or publicist can... be ostracized or discredited." [The Trend of International Affairs Since the War," International Affairs, Journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs.] cuddy50


1932.?? Rockefeller Foundation president Max Mason tells trustees that "The Social Sciences will concern themselves with the rationalization of social control... the control of human behavior." 2 Cuddy 18

1932. Dr. Ernst Rudin, the Nazi director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry (funded by "Rockefeller) was appointed president of the global Eugenics Federation.

1934 (February). A Rockefeller "progress report" (by one of the division heads) asks, "Can we develop so sound and extensive a genetics that we can hope to breed, in the future, superior men?"2 Cuddy, 18.

1942 (February or March) "...six years before the World Council of Churches was formally launched, its organizers within the Federal Council of Churches held a National Study conference at Wesleyan University in Ohio. Among the 30 delegates were 15 bishops, seven seminary presidents, and eight college and university presidents.

John Foster Dulles, who later became Secretary of State in the Eisenhower administration, chaired the conference. As head of the Federal Council's inter-Church “Commission to Study the Bases of a Just and Durable Peace,” Dulles submitted the conference report. It recommended:



a world government of delegated powers

immediate limitations on national sovereignty

international control of all armies and navies

a universal system of money

worldwide freedom of immigration

a democratically controlled international bank

even distribution of the world’s natural wealth." Edgar C. Bundy, Collectivism in the Church (1958), 165, 91

1945. UNESCO, a specialized UN agency headquartered in Paris, was established "to contribute to world peace by promoting international cooperation in education, science and culture. It's first Director-General, Julian Huxley, wrote in his book, UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy:

"The general philosophy of UNESCO should be a scientific world humanism, global in extent and evolutionary in background... In its education program it can... familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization.... Tasks for the media division of Unesco [will be] to promote the growth of a common outlook shared by all nations and cultures... to help the emergence of a single world culture." See more at http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/globalism/julian-huxley.htm
http://intelstrike.com/?p=268

-------------
1946. The NEA printed "National Education in an International World" (Teacher's College): The establishment of [UNESCO] marks the culmination of the a movement for the creation of an international agency of education.... Nations that become members of UNESCO accordingly assume an obligation to revise the textbooks used in their schools.... Each member nation... has a duty to se to it that nothing its it curriculum... is contrary to UNESCO's aims."



1946. An NEA-sponsored "World Conference of the Teaching Profession" drafted a Constitution for a World Organization of the Teaching Profession. It would be "a mighty force in aiding UNESCO" said William Carr (associate secretary of NEA's Education Policies Commission). [1] Cuddy, 24.


1946. The United States joined UNESCO, a UN agency. According to Charlotte Iserbyt, "this legislation was accompanied by President Harry Truman's remarkable statement: 'Education must establish the moral unity of mankind.' Truman's recommendation was bolstered by General Brock Chisholm, who would become the first director-general of World Health Organization (WHO), a UN specialized agency.
 

rookie

Well-known member
I vote yea, I be not sure if they be totally responsible for our ruination or not ( definitely not totally) but we outta toss em out on they chins anyway.
 

MoGal

Well-known member
Well, I think one needs to start looking at how many congressional leaders (and lets face it, CONGRESS makes the laws) are compromised because they are members of either trilateral commission, CFR, or Bilderburg ..... start asking yourself, "why are so many congressional leaders now millionaires??" Are they compromising the sovereignty of this country and the wealth of the people for their own personal gain???
People are starting to ask why this country is heading towards communism and the majority of folks feel this country is headed in the wrong direction.
 

fff

Well-known member
No. George W. Bush and the conservatives are ruining our country. It's going to take a long time to repair the damage these people have done. We'll need at least 16 years of Democratic presidents. :)
 

MoGal

Well-known member
That's the whole point, presidents and congressional leaders both Democrat and Republican have ruined this country. Granted George Bush Sr and Jr. and Bill/Hillary Clinton have done the most damage.

If Bush is to blame then why has Pelosi ( I thought she was democrat) fought so hard to prevent Bush from being impeached.

The thing of it is, each party has damaged the sovereignty of this country, refused to listen to the will of the people and has allowed lobbyists to fill up their coffers and in turn, they voted to the advantage of corporate businesses.

You gotta start thinking outside the Republican/Democrat box if you want to gain this country back and start voting out those who are pushing the United nations agenda.
 

andybob

Well-known member
The U.N. is trying to destroy the whole free world, and we would all be better off without this corrupt, evil organisation!
 
Top