• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

unraveling

gmacbeef

Well-known member
Why isn't someone challenging Oblamea on all of the law breaking he's doing :???: He cCANNOT just change the law on his own :!:
 

Tam

Well-known member
gmacbeef said:
Why isn't someone challenging Oblamea on all of the law breaking he's doing :???: He cCANNOT just change the law on his own :!:

He is being sued by the Congress but knowing the stupid way the US Courts work, they will likely be ruled to not having standings in the case of Obama making up the rules/laws of the land as he goes no matter what the Congress passes or says. :roll:

correction there is a resolution in the house asking to sue him and I hope they have the guts to pass it and stop Dictator Obama

30 congressmen sign resolution to sue Obama for ‘failure to faithfully execute the laws’

December 13, 2013 by Tom Tillison 32 Comments


Obama-self-satisfiedU.S. Rep. Tom Rice, R-S.C., is sponsoring a resolution that would compel the House to take President Barack Obama to court over his “failure to faithfully execute the laws,” should it be adopted.

The resolution points to Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution, which defines the president’s responsibilities, and charges that Obama and his administration have abused executive power and failed to execute the laws of the United States faithfully, according to The Weekly Standard.

t is therefore necessary and appropriate for Congress to turn to the courts to ensure the faithful execution of the laws as required by the Constitution,” states the resolution.


“President Obama has adopted a practice of picking and choosing which laws he wants to enforce,” Rice wrote in a letter to House members asking them to co-sponsor this resolution, The Weekly Standard reported.

“In most cases, his laws of choice conveniently coincide with his administration’s political agenda,” Rice continued. “Our Founding Fathers created the Executive Branch to implement and enforce the laws written by Congress and vested this power in the President. However, President Obama has chosen to ignore some of the laws written by Congress and implemented by preceding Presidents.”

In the letter, Rice highlighted four instances in which Obama may have overstepped his authority:


1. President Obama recently announced an “administrative fix” in regard to cancelled healthcare plans due to Obamacare. Of course he plans to provide a “fix” which will substantially alter his signature legislation without involving Congress.

2. Over the summer, President Obama’s Administration announced a one-year delay in Obamacare’s employer mandate without involving Congress.

3. Last year, President Obama’s Administration granted temporary status to illegal immigrants who entered the United States as children without involving Congress.

4. In June 2012, President Obama’s Administrative provided a waiver initiative for the welfare work requirement under TANF without involving Congress.

There are currently 29 members of Congress co-sponsoring the resolution, to include three from Florida: Bachmann (MN-06), Bridenstine (OK-01), Chaffetz (UT-03), J. Duncan (SC-03), DeSantis (FL-06), Franks (AZ-08), Gowdy (SC-04), Harris (MD-01), Lamborn (CO-05), LaMalfa (CA-01), Marino (PA-10), McClintock (CA-04), Meadows (NC-11), Nunnelee (MS-01), Pittenger (NC-09), Posey (FL-08), Tom Price (GA-06), Ribble (WI-08), Salmon (AZ-05), Sanford (SC-01), Schweikert (AZ-06), Stewart (UT-02), Stockman (TX-36), Walberg (MI-07), Weber (TX-14), Wenstrup (OH-02), Williams (TX-25), Joe Wilson (SC-02), and Yoho (FL-03
).
 

Steve

Well-known member
Judicial Watch Press Room

Judicial Watch attorneys, on behalf of Dr. Kawa, state:

This lawsuit raises a single, straightforward legal question: Does the Executive Branch have the authority to ignore a clear, congressionally-imposed deadline affecting hundreds of thousands of employers and millions of employees across the country on a matter of unquestionable importance. . . .

The answer to the question posed by this lawsuit is quite plainly “No.”

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/federal-court-asked-to-stop-obama-administration-delay-of-obamacare-employer-mandate/

in the simplest of terms does Obama have to enforce existing laws.. yes

is he.. Nope..
so either the courts stop him.. or he becomes our First dictator. .

once answered we will know if we are left with dictatorship or a Constitution that matters..
 

Steve

Well-known member
D.C. Circuit: Obama can’t ignore legislation just because he doesn’t like the policy.

Yucca Mountain ruling has important implications for Obamacare implementation and other refusals of the Obama administration to comply with congressional mandates.

In an opinion released today involving the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste storage facility, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the Executive Branch has no authority to disregard congressional mandates merely on policy grounds.

This obviously has important implications for Obama’s decisions to disregard congressional mandates in areas such as immigration, and even as to Obamacare itself as to which Obama unilaterally has delayed implementation of certain key aspects.

This case raises significant questions about the scope of the Executive’s authority to disregard federal statutes."

http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/08/d-c-circuit-obama-cant-ignore-legislation-just-because-he-doesnt-like-the-policy/
 
Top