• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

US Plans to Integrate and Subsidize Mexico and Canada???

Help Support Ranchers.net:

A

Anonymous

Guest
CFR's Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada

by Phyllis Schlafly, July 13, 2005

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has just let the cat out of the bag about what's really behind our trade agreements and security partnerships with the other North American countries. A 59-page CFR document spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

"Community" means integrating the United States with the corruption, socialism, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada. "Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

"Community" is sometimes called "space" but the CFR goal is clear: "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital, and people flow freely." The CFR's "integrated" strategy calls for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people."

The CFR document lays "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." The "common security perimeter" will require us to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations" with Mexico and Canada, "harmonize entry screening," and "fully share data about the exit and entry of foreign nationals."

This CFR document, called "Building a North American Community," asserts that George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details.

It was at this same meeting, grandly called the North American summit, that President Bush pinned the epithet "vigilantes" on the volunteers guarding our border in Arizona.

A follow-up meeting was held in Ottawa on June 27, where the U.S. representative, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, told a news conference that "we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders." The White House issued a statement that the Ottawa report "represents an important first step in achieving the goals of the Security and Prosperity Partnership."

The CFR document calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages.

Just to make sure that bringing cheap labor from Mexico is an essential part of the plan, the CFR document calls for "a seamless North American market" and for "the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico."

The document's frequent references to "security" are just a cover for the real objectives. The document's "security cooperation" includes the registration of ballistics and explosives, while Canada specifically refused to cooperate with our Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).

To no one's surprise, the CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico.

The experience of the European Union and the World Trade Organization makes it clear that a common market requires a court system, so the CFR document calls for "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution." Get ready for decisions from non-American judges who make up their rules ad hoc and probably hate the United States anyway.

The CFR document calls for allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR document calls for adopting a "tested once" principle for pharmaceuticals, by which a product tested in Mexico will automatically be considered to have met U.S. standards.

The CFR document demands that we implement "the Social Security Totalization Agreement negotiated between the United States and Mexico." That's code language for putting illegal aliens into the U.S. Social Security system, which is bound to bankrupt the system.

Here's another handout included in the plan. U.S. taxpayers are supposed to create a major fund to finance 60,000 Mexican students to study in U.S. colleges.

To ensure that the U.S. government carries out this plan so that it is "achievable" within five years, the CFR calls for supervision by a North American Advisory Council of "eminent persons from outside government . . . along the lines of the Bilderberg" conferences.

The best known Americans who participated in the CFR Task Force that wrote this document are former Massachusetts Governor William Weld and Bill Clinton's immigration chief Doris Meissner. Another participant, American University Professor Robert Pastor, presented the CFR plan at a friendly hearing of Senator Richard Lugar's Foreign Relations Committee on June 9.
 

ocm

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
779
Reaction score
0
Get working Oldtimer and pay those taxes as I am going to retire on you.

Ha! More likely that your retirement dollars will be travelling south--way south.
 

redriver

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 9, 2005
Messages
194
Reaction score
0
Location
se mb
That sounds like basic republican thought processes. Big business in the US needs cheap labour. There aren't enough real americans willing to do crappy jobs for little pay, the only solution is to open the borders. My friends in the US are not rich people, and this certainly won't help them, nor the majority of US citizens. It will help the rich and big business, republicans all.
 

ocm

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
779
Reaction score
0
That sounds like basic republican thought processes

Not quite! I'm a Republican and I hate these ideas. Phyllis Schlafly(the author of this article) is a very long time Republican. She wrote a book for the 1964 campaign of Barry Goldwater (Republican).

On the idea of regional integration there are lot of Democrats and some Republicans pushing it. The opposition to it is mostly Republican. Some Democrats don't like certain elements of things like CAFTA because they don't give the international tribunal ENOUGH power, so they voted against CAFTA
 

Kato

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
2,679
Reaction score
0
Location
Manitoba - At the end of the road
I think there's a bigger picture here.

The U.S. has world domination right now. Look around and you see China starting to become a major player, and the EU is becoming more solid as time goes by. A North American block would help counteract these. We don't even have to talk about the feelings of some in the Middle East who would love to see America brought down.

I think some in your government see the future as maybe not holding America as the only superpower, and they are starting the process to help ensure you are still in charge. I also don't think the long term plans stop at North America. I think in the long run the goal is an American block that includes North and South.

This is much bigger than having access to cheap workers to clean hotel rooms.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Typical trade "fear mongering".

Look at the obvious!

NAFTA is already in place.

What are the results of NAFTA to the U.S. beef and cattle industries?

A 7 year average $1.3 "BILLION" dollar trade surplus in the combined trade of beef, beef variety meats, hides, and live cattle" prior to the closing of the Canadian border and the loss of our export markets.

"LIONS, TIGERS, and BEARS, OH MY"! "THE SKY IS FALLING"!


So many statements and so little supporting evidence!



~SH~
 

Silver

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
5,152
Reaction score
27
Location
BC
Looks to me like old George W. is looking for more of a free ride on the backs of Canadians..... again.... :lol: :lol:
 

agman

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
1,664
Reaction score
0
Location
Denver, CO
Kato said:
I think there's a bigger picture here.

The U.S. has world domination right now. Look around and you see China starting to become a major player, and the EU is becoming more solid as time goes by. A North American block would help counteract these. We don't even have to talk about the feelings of some in the Middle East who would love to see America brought down.

I think some in your government see the future as maybe not holding America as the only superpower, and they are starting the process to help ensure you are still in charge. I also don't think the long term plans stop at North America. I think in the long run the goal is an American block that includes North and South.

This is much bigger than having access to cheap workers to clean hotel rooms.

Kato, my compliments, you are seeing the bigger picture.
 

HAY MAKER

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
8,789
Reaction score
0
Location
Texas
Big Muddy rancher said:
Get working Oldtimer and pay those taxes as I am going to retire on you. :cowboy:

I thought you already did :???: ..............good luck
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Old Timer,

If by trading with Mexico, we are downgrading our economy, as you suggest, why did we have a trade surplus with Mexico in the combined trade of beef, beef byproducts, and live cattle prior to the discovery of BSE in the U.S.?

Hope that question isn't too difficult for you?


OCM, if you want to pass on that question too, that's ok. I'll understand!



~SH~
 

Latest posts

Top