• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

USDA will make test and hold mandatory

A

Anonymous

Guest
USDA will make test and hold mandatory

By Rita Jane Gabbett on 8/5/2010


BELLEVUE, Wash. -- USDA plans to issue a Federal Register notice within the next two to three months withholding the stamp of inspection on meat products until adulterant test samples are returned with negative results, according to a USDA official.

Kenneth Petersen, assistant administrator of the Office of Field Operations for USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service, made the announcement at the National Meat Association summer conference here.

Petersen told Meatingplace USDA will not solicit comments on the new rules, which will go into effect within 30 to 90 days of being posted in the Federal Register.

Meat processors will be able to move the product -- even as far as to a customer’s loading dock -- but the shipment cannot be completed, the product cannot leave the processor’s control or be handed over to the buyer until the test results are confirmed.

The rules will apply to test results for pathogens that have been declared adulterants, which would include such pathogens as E. coli O157:H7 in ground beef, salmonella in ready-to-eat products and listeria. The rules would not apply to, for example, salmonella in raw chicken products.

Waiting for test result confirmation -- commonly referred to as “test and hold” -- is already a widespread industry practice and many industry groups have encouraged USDA to make the practice mandatory for some time.

Last October, in a letter to Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, American Meat Institute President and CEO J. Patrick Boyle said more than 80 percent of the recalls due to the presence of E. coli O157:H7 and all recalls due to the presence of listeria monocytogenes during 2009 could have been prevented if the product tested for adulterants by either the establishment or FSIS had not entered commerce until test results were available.
 

RobertMac

Well-known member
This rule has applied to my USDA processor and my meat ever since I got my label back in 2002...the inspector would not let my meat leave the processing plant before all test results were back. Just another double standard that has burdened small processors. The Government and large processors are working hand in hand to eliminate competition of direct marketers and small branded beef programs...same as the Creekstone ruling!!! HACCP was responsible for the closure of most small plants because of the financial burden of drafting and implementing a system that HAS NOT PROVEN EFFECTIVE!!!!! Large processor wanted HACCP because it put a wall between inspectors and plant function.

Someone please ask Mr. Boyle...if the packers are so interested in food safety, why didn't they voluntarily hold product until all test results were in??? Make no mistake, all regulations of the packing industry will be done with the consultation and approval of the large packers...that's what they pay for!!!!!!

By the way, I hope everyone noticed the exemption for poultry!!!

SH, this is my problem with large packers, not the fact that they make a profit.
 
Top