But I find it awfully cute how she used the "blood libel" term and had to actually justify it's use. I'm CERTAIN she had no clue of it's significance or meaning.
I had not heard the term used, and after reading the definition I felt she had used it wrong as well,.. and by the outrage of the far left,.. it is clear she should not have used the term in my opinion..
but after talking to an older Jewish friend,.. I am not so sure if it was wrong..
he said the only time he has heard it used in his life was when a family or business partner (usually both) dis-owned each other and one stooped to using libel to spread their hatred.
he felt that to justify the claim, the libel must be so offensive to sever the possibility of returning to a normal relationship would be impossible,
libel is a false claim.. and the accusations and media comments went further then that in that they only had hatred and no facts...
so what term is left.. how do you say, that the libelous claims of the left and media are so unfounded , so outrageous and without a shred of evidence, yet they laid the deaths of a child, and others on her hands..
so what words would you use to describe the lefts hatred of her ?