• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

video: Sarah Palin's interview on Hannity

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4500319/exclusive-sarah-palin-on-hannity/


http://video.foxnews.com/v/4500318/state-of-the-union/


http://video.foxnews.com/v/4500317/political-finger-pointing/
 

Tam

Well-known member
I was totally blowed away when Chris Hahn a Dem Strategist working for Chuck Shcumer was on Hannity's Great American Panel tonight and claimed that no one on the left was blaming Sarah for the Az Shooting that that she should not have interjected herself into the issue. :shock: WHERE HAS THAT MAN BEEN FOR THE LAST WEEK? :???:

You could see the Palin derangement syndome coming out of him. It was so Bad Hannity told him he was filled with hatred towards Palin and moved on to the other two guests that agreed that Sarah was asked by the media to response and she had every right to defend herself and others from the libelous statements the Left had made. The Old Coach even used Chris's own statements as an example. :roll:

About Sarah's interview can you imagine what Obama would do if someone uttered a death threat on his daughters. So much for leaving a politicans family out of the picture. :mad:
 

cheetah69

Well-known member
For folks to threaten Palin is stupid. She's a brainless, disingenuous, intellectually-uncurious twit. But she, nor her family, deserve to have their lives threatened.

But I find it awfully cute how she used the "blood libel" term and had to actually justify it's use. I'm CERTAIN she had no clue of it's significance or meaning. I'm sure she spent the days between her HILARIOUS video and this sycopant/journalist got her on his show to try to spin a justifiable reason to use the word.
 

Tam

Well-known member
cheetah69 said:
For folks to threaten Palin is stupid. She's a brainless, disingenuous, intellectually-uncurious twit. But she, nor her family, deserve to have their lives threatened.

But I find it awfully cute how she used the "blood libel" term and had to actually justify it's use. I'm CERTAIN she had no clue of it's significance or meaning. I'm sure she spent the days between her HILARIOUS video and this sycopant/journalist got her on his show to try to spin a justifiable reason to use the word.

Got to love it when a Lib calls Palin Stupid considering this

The Comeback Kid: Sarah Palin wins vice-presidential debate against Joe Biden
By Toby Harnden World Last updated: October 3rd, 2008

59 Comments Comment on this article


Well, you betcha she surprised us all. By us, I mean the media and the political class. Make no mistake – the press expected Sarah Palin to fall flat on her face, Democrats were beginning to believe that the race could have been over tonight while Republicans just wanted tonight to be over and were bracing for the worst.

But Palin tore up the script. She soared above expectations, held her own against a very experienced debater in Joe Biden, appeared to regain her campaign footing, very probably put an end to the Sarah-Palin-as-cretin news stories and will inject a bit of adrenalin back into McCain’s campaigns. In my humble opinion, Palin was the clear winner tonight. Biden acquitted himself creditably but she ran away with it


I don't think anyone that voted for Biden, that lost a debate to Palin BIG TIME, should be talking about anyone being STUPID. :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol:

BTW I see you don't take Obama's teleprompted speechs to heart either. As I thought he ask everyone to cut the mean spirited rhetoric and your LIBERAL LEFT leaning post sure doesn't sound like you listened.
But then I guess you thought the right was the only ones he was speaking to. :roll:
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
cheetah69 said:
For folks to threaten Palin is stupid. She's a brainless, disingenuous, intellectually-uncurious twit. But she, nor her family, deserve to have their lives threatened.

But I find it awfully cute how she used the "blood libel" term and had to actually justify it's use. I'm CERTAIN she had no clue of it's significance or meaning. I'm sure she spent the days between her HILARIOUS video and this sycopant/journalist got her on his show to try to spin a justifiable reason to use the word.


I love how people like you make assumptions. You assume that Palin did not know the meaning, and you also assume that obama is not lying to you, while you know he has contradicted himself about his birth story.

I can prove my claim, but you can't prove either of yours.
 

Tam

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
cheetah69 said:
For folks to threaten Palin is stupid. She's a brainless, disingenuous, intellectually-uncurious twit. But she, nor her family, deserve to have their lives threatened.

But I find it awfully cute how she used the "blood libel" term and had to actually justify it's use. I'm CERTAIN she had no clue of it's significance or meaning. I'm sure she spent the days between her HILARIOUS video and this sycopant/journalist got her on his show to try to spin a justifiable reason to use the word.


I love how people like you make assumptions. You assume that Palin did not know the meaning, and you also assume that obama is not lying to you, while you know he has contradicted himself about his birth story.

I can prove my claim, but you can't prove either of yours.

The problem is the Left can ASSUME anything they want, they can SAY anything they want and when push comes to shove they very seldom can back what they say. They don't even bother trying anymore, they just move on to the next issue without looking back. AND when their assumptions and heated rhetorical are proven to have caused a violent act they stay silent and look for something else to use to push their destructive agenda. If everyone hasn't learned that in the last week and a half they have had their heads under a rock or at least somewhere where the sun doesn't shine.
 

Steve

Well-known member
But I find it awfully cute how she used the "blood libel" term and had to actually justify it's use. I'm CERTAIN she had no clue of it's significance or meaning.

I had not heard the term used, and after reading the definition I felt she had used it wrong as well,.. and by the outrage of the far left,.. it is clear she should not have used the term in my opinion..

but after talking to an older Jewish friend,.. I am not so sure if it was wrong..

he said the only time he has heard it used in his life was when a family or business partner (usually both) dis-owned each other and one stooped to using libel to spread their hatred.

he felt that to justify the claim, the libel must be so offensive to sever the possibility of returning to a normal relationship would be impossible,

libel is a false claim.. and the accusations and media comments went further then that in that they only had hatred and no facts...

so what term is left.. how do you say, that the libelous claims of the left and media are so unfounded , so outrageous and without a shred of evidence, yet they laid the deaths of a child, and others on her hands..

so what words would you use to describe the lefts hatred of her ?
 
I think she probably knew about the term's history but I don't know if anyone could have anticipated how the media would fixate on it. I feel she wanted to know how seriously she took the accusations against her. They were pretty vile. Imagine finding out that people are blaming you for a tragic shooting like that. I wouldn't be so happy either.
 
Top