Texan
Well-known member
I think you're right. It fits equally well in both places.quickdraw said:I was going to delete this but decided it fit here as well as another thread.
I think you're right. It fits equally well in both places.quickdraw said:I was going to delete this but decided it fit here as well as another thread.
nonothing said:It is not a debate when personal slams and peoples life's are continual questioned rather than any points being debated....this is not a debate for KOL,this is 100% a defense of who she is....
,I call it an attempted assassination of ones character,done by so called grown people who claim to be educated and god fearing......It really is sad that that you keep trying to make it sound like your bulling and piling on is ok and should also be expected....No one should have to go through s*** like this....come on Aplus think about this,people on here questioning her friends and families deaths?(that in itself is heartless) .... questioning her efforts to help those who may need it.and if thats not enough she also has had her personal information looked up ......Do you honestly think that's what she gets for being a minority with a point of view? Its wrong and you know it.your just afraid to say it is all....the pack may turn on you if you do........
aplusmnt said:The Point is a persons character is at question on a place like this. And when a person says they send cookies to the troops in Iraq, but then everything out of their mouth is against the support of them troops to me I can not attack the act of sending cookies to the troops the only thing left is to attack the character or validity of that person.
aplusmnt said:When a person wants to make known personal details of their lives in the context of a political debate, then they have to be prepared for the recourse that might come from it.
If in the course of a discussion on here you make it known you are rich, highly educated, fly private jet instead of commercial, Send cookies to soldiers and then display an attitude that fits the stereotype of such a person. Then be prepared for personal attacks.
aplusmnt said:Also Personal attacks are a two way street, Kolan makes as many as anyone. Remember she is the one that put all them personal facts out there on the table, in my opinion to get attention and elevate herself. If it has back fired on her that is her problem she should have kept the personal details out of the discussion and kept to the political debate.
Think about it in what context does someone say I do not fly Commercial I only fly Private Jet? That is not something that just slips out in an online political debate.
I say Cowboy up and quit the whining!
If in the course of a discussion on here you make it known you are rich, highly educated, fly private jet instead of commercial, Send cookies to soldiers and then display an attitude that fits the stereotype of such a person. Then be prepared for personal attacks.
Econ101 said:aplus:If in the course of a discussion on here you make it known you are rich, highly educated, fly private jet instead of commercial, Send cookies to soldiers and then display an attitude that fits the stereotype of such a person. Then be prepared for personal attacks.
What, aplus, are you poor, poorly educated, fly commercial and eat the cookies instead of sending them to the soldiers all while displaying the attitude that fits the stereotype of such a republican? Are you not asking for political defeat and personal attacks?
I still think the estate tax should apply.
P Joe said:aplusmnt said:The Point is a persons character is at question on a place like this. And when a person says they send cookies to the troops in Iraq, but then everything out of their mouth is against the support of them troops to me I can not attack the act of sending cookies to the troops the only thing left is to attack the character or validity of that person.
I see you point. But I don't see the validity of name calling and such.
aplusmnt said:When a person wants to make known personal details of their lives in the context of a political debate, then they have to be prepared for the recourse that might come from it.
If in the course of a discussion on here you make it known you are rich, highly educated, fly private jet instead of commercial, Send cookies to soldiers and then display an attitude that fits the stereotype of such a person. Then be prepared for personal attacks.
Agree. If you are going to bring those facts into a political debate, you need to be prepared to defend them and why they have bearing on the topic at hand. KOl brought those personal items into the debate and didn't/couldn't defend why they belonged. That is why the majority jumped down her throat.
aplusmnt said:Also Personal attacks are a two way street, Kolan makes as many as anyone. Remember she is the one that put all them personal facts out there on the table, in my opinion to get attention and elevate herself. If it has back fired on her that is her problem she should have kept the personal details out of the discussion and kept to the political debate.
Think about it in what context does someone say I do not fly Commercial I only fly Private Jet? That is not something that just slips out in an online political debate.
I say Cowboy up and quit the whining!
Well put. Now if you don't understatnd that nonothing, then I guess you might never. I for one am tired of going on about it. Things were said, now let it be. I'm done with this thread.![]()
should the pack attack a+ now, he is obviously so dumb, that Econ had to post this twice for A+ to get it !! :wink: :wink:Econ101 said:Just a little ribbing. I missed you for a few days.
Even if you don't agree with Kola on a few things doesn't mean you can't have a good time. If that were the case, life would be boring.
Lighten up. Its almost Christmas!!!