A
Anonymous
Guest
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI&feature=related
Whitewing said:You've not read ANYTHING I've linked in all these threads have you Shamu?
And thanks for posting that viddy. You can clealy see the building DOES NOT fall in the controlled fashion of demolitions but falls to one side as explained and shown in all the links I've posted but that you've ignored.
Whitewing said:shaumei said:freefall speed on wtc7 is impossible without removing all resistance. NIST ADMITTED FREEFALL SPEED. to remove all resistance you must have demolition.
Not that I'd doubt your command of facts or how those facts are presented in your arguments, but could you provide some links to the NIST findings you keep referencing?
Whitewing said:From another thread:
Whitewing said:shaumei said:freefall speed on wtc7 is impossible without removing all resistance. NIST ADMITTED FREEFALL SPEED. to remove all resistance you must have demolition.
Not that I'd doubt your command of facts or how those facts are presented in your arguments, but could you provide some links to the NIST findings you keep referencing?
shaumei said:Whitewing said:From another thread:
Whitewing said:Not that I'd doubt your command of facts or how those facts are presented in your arguments, but could you provide some links to the NIST findings you keep referencing?
you have one of two choices...you can go to the government site and read their reports....or see NIST discussing after 7 years their explanations of how wtc7 fell in its footprint when no plane hit it...
this requires patience and about 30 minutes of your life to understand the lies behind 9/11...if you want to fully understand it from a technical stance watch 9/11 Blueprint for Truth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xl4jbNA5Nlo&p=376A6081A505839D&playnext=1&index=2
Whitewing said:To put it simply, the building DID fall over backward and to the south-east. Just not like a steel reinforced concrete building would. Another telling photo is this one taken closer to the event date.
![]()
Note just past building 7 is a small amount of debris on the white building behind it. (Building 7 is pile in the upper center-left of the photo. The white building is at the top center-left of the photo.) That building is to the north east corner of building 7. Note about 1/3rd of the east side of the building falling to the north in the photo below.
Here is another photo from over Building 7. The white building is on the left. Note the debris from building 7 which crossed the street and landed on top of the white building.
![]()
![]()
This suggests the building was split by the penthouse collapses most of the way down. One section went to the south-east while a smaller section went to the north. It wasn't that symmetrical.
shaumei said:what do you mean NO BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH VIDEO? It appears you know what not to watch to stay brainwashed.....lol...
this video proves me correct in 10 minutes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xl4jbNA5Nlo&p=376A6081A505839D&playnext=1&index=2
shaumei said:what do you mean NO BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH VIDEO? It appears you know what not to watch to stay brainwashed.....lol...
this video proves me correct in 10 minutes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xl4jbNA5Nlo&p=376A6081A505839D&playnext=1&index=2
Whitewing said:So I go back and look at that series of videos, again, just to humor Shamu. And, just as I predicted, the NIST findings that Shamu claims prove his agrument do nothing of the sort.
Shamu claims repeatedly that NIST FINALLY ADMITS WTC7 FELL AT FREEFALL SPEED, right?
Uh, Shamu, not so. Go to the video tape my mentally-impaired friend.
NIST admitted that a stage of the collapse of WTC7 occured at freefall speed (2.25 seconds to be exact), not that the building collapsed at freefall speed which is what you've claimed they've said.
Even the guy who produced the video claimed only that a portion of the NW corner of WTC7 fell at a rate within a few percent of freefall speed.
Steve said:Whitewing said:So I go back and look at that series of videos, again, just to humor Shamu. And, just as I predicted, the NIST findings that Shamu claims prove his agrument do nothing of the sort.
Shamu claims repeatedly that NIST FINALLY ADMITS WTC7 FELL AT FREEFALL SPEED, right?
Uh, Shamu, not so. Go to the video tape my mentally-impaired friend.
NIST admitted that a stage of the collapse of WTC7 occured at freefall speed (2.25 seconds to be exact), not that the building collapsed at freefall speed which is what you've claimed they've said.
Even the guy who produced the video claimed only that a portion of the NW corner of WTC7 fell at a rate within a few percent of freefall speed.
Shampooie reacted the same when I showed that the world trade center started collapsing internally seven minutes before the final dramatic collapse of the outer facade.
Whitewing said:So I go back and look at that series of videos, again, just to humor Shamu. And, just as I predicted, the NIST findings that Shamu claims prove his agrument do nothing of the sort.
Shamu claims repeatedly that NIST FINALLY ADMITS WTC7 FELL AT FREEFALL SPEED, right?
Uh, Shamu, not so. Go to the video tape my mentally-impaired friend.
NIST admitted that a stage of the collapse of WTC7 occured at freefall speed (2.25 seconds to be exact), not that the building collapsed at freefall speed which is what you've claimed they've said.
Even the guy who produced the video claimed only that a portion of the NW corner of WTC7 fell at a rate within a few percent of freefall speed.
shaumei said:Whitewing said:So I go back and look at that series of videos, again, just to humor Shamu. And, just as I predicted, the NIST findings that Shamu claims prove his agrument do nothing of the sort.
Shamu claims repeatedly that NIST FINALLY ADMITS WTC7 FELL AT FREEFALL SPEED, right?
Uh, Shamu, not so. Go to the video tape my mentally-impaired friend.
NIST admitted that a stage of the collapse of WTC7 occured at freefall speed (2.25 seconds to be exact), not that the building collapsed at freefall speed which is what you've claimed they've said.
Even the guy who produced the video claimed only that a portion of the NW corner of WTC7 fell at a rate within a few percent of freefall speed.
how can this be done without all resistance being removed? you claim that fires did it...how did isolated fires remove all resistance to allow free fall?