Watch this sourpuss CNN reporter

[Traveler]

get her day ruined by this Syrian who is thankful to Trump and critical of Obama, Hillary, and travel ban opponents.

https://youtu.be/s3uaf1NFxXc

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/04/07/cnn-narrative-fail-syrian-victim-ridicules-hillary-clinton-not-president-trump/#more-131029

 

[Tam]

President Trump is right again, make it safe for them there so they do not have to be uprooted and moved to a country where they do not want to live. Leave them there and protect them THERE. But no the liberals answers are aways "we know what is good for you so let us move you half way around the world and make you live in a culture you don't understand in a country you don't want to be in"

When the Saudi King was in the US, Trump asked him for help with the Refugees over there so they do not have to move here and it came out that they offered to help Obama with Syria and Refugees but he turned them down. That POS wanted the refugees in the US making it unsafe for US CITIZENS just like he wanted illegals in the US making it unsafe. Obama made the US so much less safe in 8 years it is scary to think about it. He poured in poorly vetted refugees, made it easier for illegals to skirt the law and stay, whipped up racial tensions and pitted law enforcement against blacks with his Black Lives matters buddies. Hell he put rich against poor, women against men, young against old, rural against urban, you name it he did everything he could to make it unsafe to live in the US. I BLAME Soros's money for a lot of this as he has tried to destroy other countries and when he saw his opportunity to take out the US through a WEAK RACE BAITING PRESIDENT he moved in for the kill by funding all of these leftwing lunatics.

All we can hope for now is that After all the foreign leaders President Trump has met with, they will get on the same page and work together to put some of these world lunatics in the cages they belong in. Pray Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Turkey, Afghanistan and all the rest of the countries that spoke up in favor of Trump's very controlled message to Assad will work with him to wipe out ISIS and take control of the world back out of the Russian and Iranian hands that OBAMA PUT IT IN. Obama's and the liberal's little 8 year experiment of leading from behind is over THANK GOD ALMIGHTY and now let us get back to negotiating peace through strength. Negotiate a deal and if somebody like Assad or Putin step up to deal in good faith GOOD but it they lie or cross a line again send in the missiles. Better to send in tomahawks than to risk soldiers to send a pointed message. If Assad has no air strips left he can't do air strikes and chemical attacks on his own people. He also can't fly terrorists out of his country as refugees into other countries like the US.

Some might not have liked what Trump did the other night but I think he did the right thing, a very controlled message that he is not going to be an apologist like Obama was. He is going to take swift action when he sees fit and nobody is going to know it is coming until it hits, So if you do not want Tomahawks raining down on you BEHAVE.

 

[Tam]

Last night they had Marie Hauf, the Obama State Department press sec, on 1st 100 Days and they showed video of Rice and Kerry claiming they had negotiated a deal with Russian and Syria that got rid of all of Assad's chemical weapons without the use of force. They were so proud of themselves they about broke their arms patting themselves on the back. BUT after what happen to the Syrian people with Assad's chemical weapons and Trumps air strike Martha asked Marie what she had to said about it and she defended Kerry and Rice by saying well we got them to destroy 13000 pounds of Chemical weapons would you have liked Assad to still have them.

That is like saying I took all the bullets out of the gun before I gave it back to the angry gunman and how was I to know he had just a few more in his back pocket. Leaving Russia to verify that Assad was telling the truth is like letting the gunman's accomplice verify the gunman had emptied his pockets. But hey at least he didn't have the six bullets you took from him to shoot you in the back once you turned to walk away. OH BTW while you lay there bleeding out he is headed to your house to kill your family and friends as oh yet he had a couple boxes in his boot.

Would you have liked it if he still had the 13000 lbs they got him to destroy? :roll: :x NO we would have liked Obama to verify Assad had destroyed ALL the chemicals and the plants they used to make the bombs and not let Russia con you into believing Assad did what he said he would do. If you found something, bring in the missiles and blow up anything that looks like it might be housing chemical bombs. If Trump's people could pick out the building housing chemicals and not blow them up while blowing everything else up why couldn't Obama use that same system to see if Assad had those chemical storage until sitting at his Air Force bases? WHY Because he wasn't looking, he was being "FLEXIBLE" and allowing Putin to tell him what he wanted to hear with out verifying the info for himself.

This is why the world is in the mess it is in. I'm betting the reason the left doesn't want Trump getting close enough to Putin to even talk is because they are scare he might just find out HOW FLEXIBLE Obama was with Putin and just what kind of deal Putin made for that 20% of US Uranium Hillary sold him. Can't take a chance on any of it coming out so blame Russia with interfering in US election to help Trump win and threaten treason charges and impeachment if Trump even dares to sit down and talk to Putin. Sick Sick SICK

 

[Traveler]

Tam, I think you hit the nail on the head again. I'm sure Obama wanted the refugees moved here, instead of staying in the Middle East, and their homeland, to do more of the "fundamentally transforming the US". The more breeding stock we let in the quicker we become a Muslim nation. Nothing else makes sense.

 

[Tam]

I'm with Trump leave them over there if they want to become suicide bombers let they blow up their own neighbourhoods containing their own mothers, brothers, sisters,daughters, and sons. Why bring them here so they can blow our families up. We have enough US born wing nuts to deal will why make the problem harder to sort out. The only reason for it is to weight the scale IN THEIR FAVOR.

 

[Steve]

The recent liberal whine is trump didn't ask for permission to drop a few bombs..

It just isn't in out national interests "Does Trump need congressional approval to strike Syria?"

YET,...

Is the U.S. at war in Libya, putting President Obama in violation of the War Powers Resolution?

Its answers took these forms: a presidential letter to lawmakers, a 38-page report defending administration behavior, and a flurry of insistent sound bites. "We are in no way putting into question the constitutionality of the War Powers Resolution," "We are not engaged in any of the activities that typically over the years in War Powers analysis has considered to constitute hostilities within the meaning of the statute. We're not engaged in sustained fighting, there's been no exchange of fire with hostile forces, we don't have troops on the ground, we don't risk casualties to those troops."

It all sounds persuasive, doesn't it? But the arguments just quoted, the contents of the letter, and the 38 page report do more to confirm that President Obama has acted illegally in waging an ongoing war than to refute that serious charge. Alas, we're talking about rhetoric prepared by a team of executive branch lawyers and bureaucrats, so untangling its flawed logic, various attempts at misdirection, and Orwellian locutions is going to require effort. Are you up for understanding why Libya is an illegal conflict and how Obama is trying to obscure that?

In the Obama administration's narrative, the U.S. launched its combat operations on March 19 to help establish a no-fly zone authorized by the UN and to stop Qaddafi's forces from advancing on Benghazi, a stronghold of regime opponents the dictator vowed to slaughter. The administration neglects to mention that CIA agents were in the country prior to that date meeting with rebels and gathering intelligence -- or that President Obama had authorized them to supply arms to the rebels.

The White House does acknowledge these facts: the total projected cost for Pentagon operations in Libya is $1.1 billion; the U.S. has so far spent roughly $750 million, more than $398 million on munitions alone; since March 31, when the White House said that operations had been handed off to NATO, more than 2,500 sorties have been flown by American pilots, including at least some "strike sorties"; unmanned American Predator drones are also flying missions over Libya to this day

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/06/obama-fails-to-justify-the-legality-of-war-in-libya/240545/

Not sure the amount of moral equivalence a liberal has to choke on every day to attack Trump and defend Obama, but I am sure even this comparison would drown an elephant.

And when did gadaffy use chemical weapons?