• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

We are to BLINDLY trust.

Tam

Well-known member
More than 50 intelligence analysts working out of the U.S. military’s Central Command have formally complained that their reports on ISIS and al Qaeda’s branch in Syria were being inappropriately altered by senior officials,

As reports emerged Thursday that an internal investigation by the Central Intelligence Agency’s inspector general found that the CIA “improperly” spied on US Senate staffers when researching the CIA’s dark history of torture, it was hard to conclude anything but the obvious: John Brennan blatantly lied to the American public. Again.

“The facts will come out,” Brennan told NBC News in March after Senator Dianne Feinstein issued a blistering condemnation of the CIA on the Senate floor, accusing his agency of hacking into the computers used by her intelligence committee’s staffers. “Let me assure you the CIA was in no way spying on [the committee] or the Senate,” he said.

After the CIA inspector general’s report completely contradicted Brennan’s statements, it now appears Brennan was forced to privately apologize to intelligence committee chairs in a “tense” meeting earlier this week. Other Senators on Thursday pushed for Brennan to publicly apologize and called for an independent investigation. Sen. Ron Wyden said it well:

A group of congressmen led by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) is pushing for President Obama to fire James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, who they say misled Congress about the extent of the NSA's surveillance activity.

The lawmakers called Clapper's position "incompatible" with the administration's effort to restore trust in the NSA, according to a letter sent to the White House Monday. The group is mostly Republican, but includes one Democrat, Rep. Alan Grayson (Fla.).

"Director Clapper continues to hold his position despite lying to Congress under oath about the existence of bulk data collection programs in March 2013," the letter reads. "Asking Director Clapper, and other federal intelligence officials who misrepresented programs to Congress and the courts, to report to you on needed reforms ... is not a credible solution."

What the American people witnessed yesterday was a sitting FBI Director answer extremely pointed questions — about Emailgate and Servergate — in such a way that they proved he was the pivotal part of a highly sophisticated cover-up of a series of high crimes (class 1 felonies) that compromised the security of the United States Federal Government in ways both unprecedented and profound
.

A new report from Fox News shows that the agents and investigators at the FBI and the Department of Justice are revolting against director James Comey’s actions over Hillary Clinton’s email scandal.

They want the truth to be heard by the American people!

Many agents have indicated that they are disgusted by what transpired and are coming out of the woodwork to reveal the truth behind the investigation.

Sources indicate that it was nearly unanimous that agents and attorneys behind the scenes at both departments wanted Hillary to be charged for her crimes.

While that mindset was approaching 100%, it was indeed unanimous that at the very least Clinton should have had her security clearances revoked.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYn1LBUcymE


Ok these are the Obama heads of Intel agencies that the left wants everyone to believe lock stock and barrel when they testified before Congress Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta. How any times are we to overlook their LYING before we are free to think for ourselves and call the HEADS of Obama Intel LIARS. :roll:
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
Lou Dobbs had Col. Ralph Peters on as a guest tonight and they got into a shouting match. Ralph Peters insisted the National Intelligence findings were right and Dobbs wouldn't go along with it, asking repeatedly, "where's the proof?" Peters accused Dobbs of standing up for Putin. It got pretty intense.

I was quite surprised at Ralph Peters stance on the subject.
 

Tam

Well-known member
Some of these people must believe people are stupid enough to not remember the last 8 years and all those televised C Span Hearing whereClinton, Clapper, Brennen, Comey, Lynch, Lerner, Holder and others have been caught lying to the Congress. What makes me so mad is if anyone else went before Congress and lied they would be weeding the Prison garden for the next ten years but these POS are promoted to a higher office and given a bonus. AND if you dare doubt their next re-written talking points/LIES you are a traitor and should be ashamed to even think they aren't telling the truth. :mad:
 

Tam

Well-known member
Faster horses said:
Lou Dobbs had Col. Ralph Peters on as a guest tonight and they got into a shouting match. Ralph Peters insisted the National Intelligence findings were right and Dobbs wouldn't go along with it, asking repeatedly, "where's the proof?" Peters accused Dobbs of standing up for Putin. It got pretty intense.

I was quite surprised at Ralph Peters stance on the subject.

Just saw the Peter's interview and wow he has drank the KOOLAID.

I tweeted Dobbs and pointed out the agents are not the problem it is their bosses rewriting reports to match Obama's talking points The AGENTS complain but noboby is held accountable for the lies the agency heads are putting out as Obama is telling them what HE WANTS THEM TO SAY and they are willing idiots. CIA, NSA, FBI and DOJ "OFFICIALS" are all Obama mindless puppets. :mad: And we are all unpatroitic if we don't believe their crap anymore!!!!!! :mad:
 

Tam

Well-known member
What gets to me is the reasons they claim Russia/Putin did it.
Putin supposedly did this to damage Hillary's chances of becoming President.DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE????

Putin knows by all those leaked emails, and personal experience, all he had to do to get what ever he wanted FROM HILLARY was donate a large some of money to the Clinton Foundation or hire Bill to make a speech in Russia.

They claim Putin wanted Trump DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE????

Putin already had a record of getting what he wanted from Hillary (20% of US Uranium) He knows her strengths from her failed Sec of State time, where not even her supporters can name one accomplishment. NOW we are to believe Putin wanted Trump after he campaigned on making the US Military GREAT AGAIN. Which means Putin's influence in the world is likely going to be set back to pre Obama times. US enemies, especially Russia, do not respect the US as they see a WEAK Commander and Chief that negotiates weak deals and lets US enemies walk over red lines all they want. And she was part of the failed administration that lead to Putin's rise in World influence. Why would Putin want to damage her chances when she would have been a MUCH WEAKER President proven by her own record. Besides that Why would he release the emails if he thought he could use them to get her to back off and stay out of Russian business once she became President?

Nothing Lying Clapper and Lying Brennen can say will convince me that they know without a doubt it was Putin.
In fact if either one of those two told me what my name was I would go get my birth certificate to prove it to myself.
 

Steve

Well-known member
Putin supposedly did this to damage Hillary's chances of becoming President.DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE????

If you have ever worked with or had business dealings with Russians you would start to understand how it makes sense to them.

They despise anyone who roles over,.. especially against their countries best interests.

Add in a few personal insults and you have contempt.



On the other said,, we think a weak leader is good for Russia, not really,.. Russians need an adversary such as the US to "blame" their conditions on,..

Castro did it for fifty years,.. North Korea still does it.. blame the us embargo, sanctions and such on why communist utopia isn't attainable

it is complex and Russians love complex,. you have to hammer them at every point and earn their respect, otherwise you are dirt to them..
 

Tam

Well-known member
Sorry Putin knew he could get what he wanted from her from personal experience (IE Uranium deal) as did many foreign leaders hence all the foreign donations to the Corrupt Clinton foundation and I somehow doubt he would chance that to put Trump in and chance Trump would take back all his gains. Putin is as power hungry as Clinton is money grubbing the two worked well together to give him what he wanted. Getting that Uranium deal put a feather in his cap as now he controls 20% of US Uranium and that makes him look good to his country, He got one over on BIG BAD US. Makes no sense he would risk that to take a chance on an unknown.
 
Top