• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

We should set up a "scandal" pool...

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
...what will tomorrow's be? Or, can they hit 7 new ones within a week?


:lol:

We should have let you obamazombies know that there were embarrassing days ahead for you...
 

Steve

Well-known member
no scandal next week...

a war maybe...

or at least a proxie war...

it will be a humdinger.. the Obama administration and John McCain will side with AL-Qaeda and other assorted terrorists against Syria.. to get back at Russia.. while the rest of the middle east burns...

and if that doesn't work.. expect an acquittal in the Zimmerman case that Obama can call stupid and the subsequent race riots, that Obama calls on community organizers to call for calm...
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
...what will tomorrow's be?


Whatever it is, I doubt it is anything along the lines of him being caught with a cigar and a female staffer.


What do you think the Vegas odds would have been of a lib male precident having more than 5 big time scandals and not a single one involving sex with a chick?

A few benjamins on that deal would have been like hitting a state lotto.


(I just can't call him President. I have too much respect for the office created by the Constitution that I feel had to be inspired by universal truth and good, and therefor God.)
 

Mike

Well-known member
and if that doesn't work.. expect an acquittal in the Zimmerman case that Obama can call stupid and the subsequent race riots, that Obama calls on community organizers to call for calm...

My daughter lives a few miles from Sanford, Fl. The word on the street is that there will be huge riots if Zim is acquitted and a celebratory riot if guilty.

She says there are already 1,000's of outside instigator blacks converged in town now.

White business owners lose either way.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Mike said:
and if that doesn't work.. expect an acquittal in the Zimmerman case that Obama can call stupid and the subsequent race riots, that Obama calls on community organizers to call for calm...

My daughter lives a few miles from Sanford, Fl. The word on the street is that there will be huge riots if Zim is acquitted and a celebratory riot if guilty.

She says there are already 1,000's of outside instigator blacks converged in town now.

White business owners lose either way.

society loses either way. And that was the intention with this show trial.
 

Steve

Well-known member
it is sad that our goverment can be moved by mob rule..and the threat of riots and violence...

but that is what democracy is in it's worst form.. and democrats seem to want to push everything to the lowest possible conclusion..
.
 

Mike

Well-known member
March 26, 2012 - Over the weekend, members of the New Black Panther Party showed just how tense the situation in the Trayvon Martin shooting has gotten: They offered a $10,000 bounty for the capture of George Zimmerman, who shot and killed the unarmed teenager.

The Orlando Sentinel reports that Mikhail Muhammad announced the reward during a protest on Saturday, and when a Sentinel reporter asked if he was inciting violence, Muhammad said, "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth."

Nationally the shooting death has brought up questions about whether Zimmerman, who was on a Neighborhood Watch patrol, profiled Martin and whether Sanford police's failure to arrest Zimmerman had to do with racism.

The New Black Panther's bounty just heightens that narrative.

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, the New Black Panther Party has been rejected by the Black Panther Party of the '60s and '70s. The SPLC says the group is "a virulently racist and anti-Semitic organization whose leaders have encouraged violence against whites, Jews and law enforcement officers..."

The Sentinel also reported that the group "called for the mobilization of 10,000 black men to capture Zimmerman."
 

Steve

Well-known member
Nationally the shooting death has brought up questions about whether Zimmerman, who was on a Neighborhood Watch patrol, profiled Martin and whether Sanford police's failure to arrest Zimmerman had to do with racism.

When you "doctor" the evidence to make it look racists.. then you will get a national response that "thinks" it might just be racism...
 

Mike

Well-known member
Steve said:
Nationally the shooting death has brought up questions about whether Zimmerman, who was on a Neighborhood Watch patrol, profiled Martin and whether Sanford police's failure to arrest Zimmerman had to do with racism.

When you "doctor" the evidence to make it look racists.. then you will get a national response that "thinks" it might just be racism...

Sure, but the reward for Zimmerman by the Black Panthers takes no "thinking" on whether it is racist.

Racism works two ways but liberals know of only one.....it's everybody against the "Black" man.

Abraham Lincoln knew the white & black man could never both live together in a society equal & harmoniously. There will always be one or the other trying to gain a dominant role over the other.

When are we going to admit it?

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n5p-4_Morgan.html
 

TexasBred

Well-known member
RACISM EXPLAINED

A black kid asks his mother, "Mama, what's a Democracy?"

"Well, son, that's when white folks work every day so we can get all our benefits,
you knows like free cell phones for each family member, rent subsidy, food stamps,
WIC, free healthcare, utility subsidy, & the list goes on & on, you knows".

"But mama, don't the white people get pissed off about that?"

"Sure they do, that's called racism!"

(Never more simply explained)
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
TexasBred said:
RACISM EXPLAINED

A black kid asks his mother, "Mama, what's a Democracy?"

"Well, son, that's when white folks work every day so we can get all our benefits,
you knows like free cell phones for each family member, rent subsidy, food stamps,
WIC, free healthcare, utility subsidy, & the list goes on & on, you knows".

"But mama, don't the white people get p****d off about that?"

"Sure they do, that's called racism!"

(Never more simply explained)

:agree:
 

Steve

Well-known member
Steve said:
no scandal next week...

a war maybe...

or at least a proxie war...

it will be a humdinger.. the Obama administration and John McCain will side with AL-Qaeda and other assorted terrorists against Syria.. to get back at Russia.. while the rest of the middle east burns... .

Obama administration: Syrian regime used chemical weapons against opposition

The use of chemical weapons crosses the so-called "red line" first established by Obama last year, which he said would prompt the administration to alter its posture. The administration said on Thursday that Obama had decided to broaden support to the Supreme Military Council, a principal opposition group in Syria, and Rhodes said that assistance "will include military support."

Rhodes declined to specify what kind of military support the United States would provide to the SMC, but noted that Obama had not decided to establish a no-fly zone, as some Republicans have demanded.

Rhodes also noted that the United States had prepared for "multiple contingencies" — military, diplomatic, or economic — to help put pressure on the Assad government.

“I applaud the president’s decision and I appreciate it," Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., one such hawk, said Thursday on the Senate floor.[/quote]

on another note...
WASHINGTON - Speaking to a private audience in New York on Wednesday, Bill Clinton said that US President Barack Obama risks looking like "a total fool"

and as if it could not get worse...
A senior official in Egypt's presidency said Thursday that Egyptians are free to join the fight in Syria and will not be prosecuted

In a response to an Associated Press question about the government's stance on citizens going to fight alongside Syrian rebels, Khaled al-Qazzaz said that "the right of travel or freedom of travel is open for all Egyptians," adding that the state was taking no measures against anyone who goes to fight in Syria.

The comments by al-Qazzaz, a foreign affairs adviser to Islamist President Mohammed Morsi, come at a time when clerics have stepped up calls for Sunnis in the Arab world to go to Syria to fight the regime in response to the Lebanese Shiite guerrilla group Hezbollah's overt intervention backing the Syrian military against rebels.

The calls have hiked fears that Syria's civil war will slide deeper into sectarian conflict and that foreign jihadis will take an even greater role in the rebellion. The presence of non-Syrian extremists, some with al-Qaida links, among the rebels has made the U.S. and its allies reluctant to send weapons to the rebellion.

anyone have a match?
 

Steve

Well-known member
no scandal next week...

a war maybe...

or at least a proxie war...

it will be a humdinger.. the Obama administration and John McCain will side with AL-Qaeda and other assorted terrorists against Syria.. to get back at Russia.. while the rest of the middle east burns... .



Russia Is Upping The Ante By Sending Its Only Aircraft Carrier To The Mediterranean

The carrier — named the "Admiral Kuznetsov" — is quite the beast, and word of its addition to the area of operations is just the latest in jockeying between the U.S. and Russia.

The heavy aircraft-carrying missile cruiser is the only one in Russia's fleet, so its deployment is an unmistakable signal of Moscow's seriousness about protecting their regional interests, some of which are directly tied to the fate of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and the Syrian port of Tartus.

In May a detachment from Russia’s Pacific Fleet entered the Mediterranean waters for the first time since the Cold War.

"The Russian Defense Ministry started setting up a special force of warships in the Mediterranean in order to protect Russia's interests in the region,"

The support Russia has provided to the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad during the 26-month conflict includes guns, grenades, tank parts, fighter jets, advanced antiship cruise missiles, long-range air defense missiles, military officers as advisors, diplomatic cover, and lots of cash.

Topping it off, all of these ships are guarding Assad's ancestral homeland and only route out of the country.

Russia's intentions with sending the hardware of S300 missile systems is only part of their strategy to stifle the U.S. precedent of regime change. Having Russians man the systems with personnel on the ground is a deterrent to Israeli air strikes. Loss of life is more politically significant than destroyed hardware, and Putin is aware of this.

Israel, the U.K., U.S., and France are much less likely to bomb systems manned by Russians. Especially considering Russia is a country that holds a permanent seat in the U.N. Security Council.

Russia could be taking a page from 1962 Cuban missile crisis playbook, when the U.S. Air Force came up with a plan to run 100 bombing sorties to destroy Russian missile emplacements.

There were two problems to the Air Force plan back in 1962. One was the political implications of a U.S. strike on a smaller country. George Ball, then-undersecretary of state, said that a surprise attack of that magnitude would look like a "Pearl Harbor" in reverse.

The second problem was that a slew of Russian citizens would have been killed in the strikes — which meant the move would have essentially put American and Russian forces

in direct "hot war" contact.

Then-Secretary of Defense Robert McNammara said of the proposed bombing runs, "I don't know quite what kind of a world we live in after we've struck Cuba, and we've started it ... How do we stop at that point?"

Kennedy knew this. He'd already lost a U2 pilot to Russian SAMs and he didn't want to risk more gunfire.

Instead of more shots fired, Kennedy went the alternate route of blockading Cuba. The blockade put Russia and the U.S. navies "eyeball to eyeball," said then-Secretary of State Dean Rusk.

Russia blinked.

Kennedy was often considered a smart person with war experience and had some of the best military minds wanting him to succeed..

Obama is not Kennedy,.. and is looking for a distraction...
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Steve said:
Kennedy was often considered a smart person with war experience and had some of the best military minds wanting him to succeed..

Obama is not Kennedy,.. and is looking for a distraction...

Syria is just as much a democracy, as Egypt was, before Mubarak's overthrow...has the US been backing the wrong side, for the past 5 years?

Makes one wonder, when the US is sending weapons to terrorists?
 

Steve

Well-known member
on a worse note... we know Obama is not even in the same class as Kennedy..

but comparing Obama to GW Bush.. for many the contrast is not so stark...

Bush knew that we could "easily" take Iraq... we had pushed Iraq back and they were no match...

in Afghanistan... we easily pushed the Taliban back knowing their weaknesses..

and Bush based those decisions on our past experience with the two countries.. his huge miscalculation was in "keeping the peace"

so how will Obama act in Syria... based on our intervention in Libya,.. it is likely he sees no real downside..

sure we had Benghazi.. logically the answer would be to now put a consular office in Syria ..

but if Obama takes the arrogance approach.. will he fail worse them bush.. and end up in a world war? or at least in a middle east war?

he needs a distraction.. and his mistake will be in thinking John McCain is still a conservative hero...

fact is,.. John McCain never was conservative.. let alone our hero..

and that Russia and Iran will take lightly of our meddling.. they both think we are weak... and that Obama is a fool..

and we know Bill Clinton just goaded him into a fight...

we know by past experience Bush's war policy was a failure...

but is Obama to arrogant to learn from Bush's miscalculation?

my bet.. Obama is to stupid to see this is not a fight we should be in...
 

Steve

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
Steve said:
Kennedy was often considered a smart person with war experience and had some of the best military minds wanting him to succeed..

Obama is not Kennedy,.. and is looking for a distraction...

Syria is just as much a democracy, as Egypt was, before Mubarak's overthrow...has the US been backing the wrong side, for the past 5 years?

Makes one wonder, when the US is sending weapons to terrorists?

everyone wants stability...

before the soviet union fell apart.. many Russians wanted more freedom.. soon after they wanted stability...

in Iraq,.. we thought they wanted freedom... but many now do not see any freedom.. and my bet is most would gladly take back the stability they lost...

same may be said for Egypt.. and even Turkey..

yet no one who is free wants a dictator..

right now we have stability.. and a perception of a democracy here as well...



has the US been backing the wrong side, for the past 5 years?

I think Obama "thought" he was backing the right side.. so did Bush..

and that 'side" is those who wanted freedom and democracy..

but it is clear that once that "side" got the old dictators out,.. they lost the battle to democracy.

and in each battle over the last 12 years has ended up with a more hardline islamist regime in power.. one who hates the US and Israel...

when I was young,.. I thought everyone deserves a democracy,... now I don't wish one on my worst enemy.. :?
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Steve said:
when I was young,.. I thought everyone deserves a democracy,... now I don't wish one on my worst enemy.. :?

"Progressives", whether they be Nazis, Islamists, or obama, do not want any type of democracy. They are tyrants.

They redefine words all the time and as bad as Democracy is, their unspoken definition is even worse. They only use it as another "feel good" word.

In many countries right now, "mob rule", would be better than what they have. In the US, it is looking as if "mob rule" is only a stepping stone, towards progressive "democracy".
 

Steve

Well-known member
In many countries right now, "mob rule", would be better than what they have. In the US, it is looking as if "mob rule" is only a stepping stone, towards progressive "democracy".

mob rule only works when the democrats want it to

in Iran.. the Obama administration ignored it...

in Tunisia and the countries that had the first uprisings.. and stable somewhat pro american governments.. they supported it it..

In Libya a country with a wackjob leader that had moderated.. they went all in.. and bombed him out.. yet missed all the weapons depots..
letting weapons into the hands of terrorists.. who used them against US..

in Yemen... a failed terrorist state.. they ignored it..

in Egypt.. with a somewhat pro American goverment..and a leadership with a solid treaty with Israel they went all in and called for an overturn..

in Syria.. they tried to ignore it.. and then somewhat sided with terrorists..

and at home.. when the TEA party a pro American group went to DC in massive numbers.. they ignored it..

and when the anti american OWS shat on our streets. they supported them..

if we judged them by their actions.. it would say they don't care about the people.. but just want radical extremists in charge..
 
Top