• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Well duhhhhhh!

hopalong

Well-known member
http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/15/22314076-senate-panel-on-benghazi-the-attacks-were-preventable?lite&ocid=msnhp&pos=1
notice this is NBC news too!!!
What say Hillary now??
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
What say Hillary now? "At this point, what difference does it make?" That is what she will say. The best indication of future behavior is past behavior. Who needs more of that????????????

That Senate finding needs to be the headline on every newspaper in the country. Not only is she not fit to run for President, she should be charged with murder. And Obama too. :x

I would hope that the GOP would keep this in the face of the voters from now to November. Not sure they are that wise, however. They are pretty distracted with damaging the Tea Party to take on such things as this. :mad:

Time to listen to Leftwing news and see how they justify Obama and Hillary blaming the attack on a video. BTW, is the producer of said video still in jail?
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Faster horses said:
The best indication of future behavior is past behavior. Who needs more of that????????????
The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

Why?

“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

http://patdollard.com/2013/05/flashback-hillary-clinton-fired-from-watergate-investigation-for-lying-unethical-behavior-conspiracy-to-violate-the-constitution/
 

Tam

Well-known member
The best part about this report is the fact it is the Senate and Diane Feinstein Democrat from California is the Chair of the bipartisan committee that the report came from. So there is no way for Obama and the Press to blame it on the Republicans. The Press has to decide do they report the honest news and let the cards fall where they fall or do they not report it? If they do report it they can't write it off as a witch hunt. If they don't report it then everyone has to know they DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE TRUTH.
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
I'll put my money on them not reporting it. It's not in their best interest to do so. And they've got Bridge Gate handy to distract the dummy's who don't want to know the truth anyway. There will be a certain amount of people (A LOT) that will turn away from the truth anyway. After spending 30 years in the newspaper business, I can assure you there are always a certain amount of people who just don't want to know.
 

Tam

Well-known member
If you read the comments from the liberals posted after the NBC article, you can see where the topic is going to go already.

We are right back to the farce of "if the Republicans had not cut the budget then the State Department would have had the money to provide Ambassador Stevens with the security he requested"

Never mine the FACT that Charlene Lamb testified before Congress to the fact, the denied security was not due to lack of funds. In other words the fact the 2013 budget wasn't increased as much as the State Department requested had nothing to do with the attack in 2012. :roll:

But then when has sworn testimony ever mattered to these koolaid drinking fools. To them if Obama read something from a telepromter it must be true. 99.9% of them could and probably will lose their health care plans and doctors and they will still believe Obama when he said they could keep them and it is the insurance companies fault they are without insurance and it is the Doctor's fault he stopped taking patients. :roll:
 
Top