• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

WH warns the EPA might hurt Business.

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Administration Warns of 'Command-and-Control' Regulation Over Emissions


The Obama administration is warning Congress that if it doesn't move to regulate greenhouse gases, the Environmental Protection Agency will take a "command-and-control" role over the process in a way that could hurt business.

The warning, from a top White House economic official who spoke Tuesday on condition of anonymity, came on the eve of EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson's address to the international conference on climate change in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Jackson, however, tried to strike a tone of cooperation in her address Wednesday, explaining that the EPA's new powers to regulate greenhouse gases will be used to complement legislation pending in Congress, not replace it.

"This is not an 'either-or' moment. It's a 'both-and' moment," she said.

But while administration officials have long said they prefer Congress take action on climate change, the economic official who spoke with reporters Tuesday night made clear that the EPA will not wait and is prepared to act on its own.

And it won't be pretty.

"If you don't pass this legislation, then ... the EPA is going to have to regulate in this area," the official said. "And it is not going to be able to regulate on a market-based way, so it's going to have to regulate in a command-and-control way, which will probably generate even more uncertainty."

Climate change legislation that passed the House is stuck in the Senate, but the EPA finding Monday was seen as a boost to the U.S. delegation in Denmark trying to convince other countries that Washington is capable of taking action to follow through with any global commitments.

The economic official explained that congressional action could be better for the economy, since it would provide "compensation" for higher energy prices, especially for small businesses dealing with those higher energy costs. Otherwise, the official warned that the kind of "uncertainty" generated by unilateral EPA action would be a huge "deterrent to investment," in an economy already desperate for jobs.

"So, passing the right kind of legislation with the right kind of compensations seems to us to be the best way to reduce uncertainty and actually to encourage investment," the official said.

Republicans fear that the EPA will ultimately end up stepping in to regulate emissions -- though many oppose the congressional legislation as well. They had urged Jackson to withdraw the finding in light of leaked e-mails from a British research center that appeared to show scientists discussing the manipulation of climate data.

Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., ranking Republican on the House Select Committee for Energy Independence and Global Warming, said Tuesday he is going to attend the Copenhagen conference to inform world leaders that despite any promises made by President Obama, no new laws will be passed in the United States until the "scientific fascism" ends.

"I call it 'scientific fascism,'" Sensenbrenner said during a press conference with fellow climate change skeptics. Sensenbrenner said, "The U.N. should throw a red flag" on scientists who support global warming to the exclusion of dissent.

Administration officials, though, said the e-mails do not change the debate.

Former Vice President Al Gore, a leader in the movement on man-caused climate change, told CNN on Wednesday that the e-mails in questions were 10 years old and taken "out of context."

Fox News' Major Garrett and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/09/administration-warns-command-control-regulation-emissions/
 

Lonecowboy

Well-known member
But while administration officials have long said they prefer Congress take action on climate change, the economic official who spoke with reporters Tuesday night made clear that the EPA will not wait and is prepared to act on its own.

And it won't be pretty.

"If you don't pass this legislation, then ... the EPA is going to have to regulate in this area," the official said. "And it is not going to be able to regulate on a market-based way, so it's going to have to regulate in a command-and-control way, which will probably generate even more uncertainty."

can't congress just jerk the funding for EPA???
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Why would Congress do that? The Dems want either Cap and Trade passed or the EPA/Executive branch to have these powers.

They pushed the Supreme Court for a decision 2 years ago that stated that if emissions were harming health, then the EPA could regulate them.

Senator John Kerry, Democrat of Massachusetts, said; “It’s an historic moment when the Supreme Court has to step in to protect the environment from the Bush administration.”
http://www.floridaclimatechange.com/pressreleaseJusticesRule.asp

Well, now the EPA has said that emissions are harming health.

It's blackmail, with the same end result. But Congress will have a scapegoat in the EPA. They pushed for the EPA/Exec. branch to have these powers

"We had to pass Cap and Trade, or it would have been worse."

This was the plan.


April 2009
Now you have a choice ... Do you want the EPA to make the decision or would you like your congressman or senator to be in the room and drafting legislation? So we think this is a very helpful development that focuses the mind," Markey said at a meeting on clean energy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, just outside Boston.

"It is the strong preference of the administration that we secure legislation," Browner said at the forum. "There are things that can be done with legislation that won't quite work within the existing law."

"If Congress doesn't act, then clearly there is a residual authority now granted by the Supreme Court of the United States to the EPA to regulate greenhouse gases," Markey said. "The only way to avoid that is to have Congress act."

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE53C4EG20090413

Dec 2009
The conclusion prods Congress to pass a sweeping emissions law that has stalled in the Senate by paving the way for EPA to regulate the gases under its existing authority. "The message to Congress is crystal-clear: Get moving" said Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), a chief architect of Senate climate legislation, adding that if Congress doesn’t act, EPA is “more than justified” to move ahead.
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/71079-epa-in-copenhagen-push


In modern usage, a tyrant carries modern connotations of a harsh and cruel ruler who places his or her own interests or the interests of a small oligarchy over the best interests of the general population which the tyrant governs or controls. ...
 
Top