• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

What about N Korea??

kolanuraven

Well-known member
NO ONE here so far has mentioned the antics of N Korea.

Better get out your kim chee ( kimchi) and just talk to the little man in the jumpsuit!!!! That's all he wants is attention.....why won't your prez talk to the man??

He ( bush) charged into Iraq on a whim....and we KNOW that N Korean has nukes....so now has GeorgeII lost his nerve?
 

Southdakotahunter

Well-known member
Isnt he your Pres also?? If not, who is yours....Castro?

I dont think he has lost any nerves. Matter of fact, i think his NADS are the size of grapefruit. Maybe he is listening to all the crybaby leftwingers who think the UN will take care of this. After nothing happens, we will take care of the problem, just like Iran.
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
I've never claimed him so that should not be a news flash!

If he does pull another stunt like in Iraq.....you'll be able to read at nite WITHOUT a nite lite on those long dark SD nites!!
 

Cowpuncher

Well-known member
Who was it in the 1990s agreed to give food and fuel oil to the North Koreans? Sure didn't want them to spend their nuke money on their own people.
 

agreeable

Active member
When you talk to him all you do is legitimize his actions.

Crank up the presses for some new maps and mail him one.
See what is reaction is.
 

Steve

Well-known member
Maybe we should give him one of our Nukes.....and an ICBM.....just to show him what they are really like....
 

Liberty Belle

Well-known member
Kola, knowing your admiration for Clinton, I just had to share this column of Ann Coulter's (another favorite of yours?) with you. I got it from one of "my" servicemen just back from Iraq:

CLINTON'S LATEST GLOW JOb
by Ann Coulter
October 11, 2006


With the Democrats' full-throated moralizing of late, I'm almost tempted to vote for them — although perhaps "full-throated" is the wrong phrase to use with regard to Democrats and sex scandals. The sudden emergence of the Swift Butt Veterans for Truth demonstrates that the Democrats would prefer to talk about anything other than national security.

Unfortunately for them, the psychotic Kim Jong Il seems to be setting off nukes, raising the embarrassing issue of the Clinton administration's 1994 "peace" deal with North Korea.

At least with former Rep. Mark Foley, you could say the Democrats' hypocritical grandstanding was just politics. But in the case of North Korea, Democrats are resorting to bald-faced lies.

Current New Mexico governor and former Clinton administration official Bill Richardson has been on tour, bragging about the groundbreaking Clinton administration negotiations with North Korea — keeping his fingers crossed that no one has access to news from 1994.

In 1994, the Clinton administration got a call from Jimmy Carter — probably collect — who was with the then-leader of North Korea, saying: "Hey, Kim Il Sung is a total stud, and I've worked out a terrific deal. I'll give you the details later."

Clinton promptly signed the deal, so he could forget about North Korea and get back to cheating on Hillary. Mission accomplished.

Under the terms of the "agreed framework," we gave North Korea all sorts of bribes — more than $5 billion worth of oil, two nuclear reactors and lots of high technology. In return, they took the bribes and kept building nukes. This wasn't difficult, inasmuch as the 1994 deal permitted the North Koreans to evade weapons inspectors for the next five years.

Yes, you read that right: North Korea promised not to develop nukes, and we showed how much we trusted them by agreeing to no weapons inspections for five years.

The famed "allies," whom liberals claim they are so interested in pleasing, went ballistic at this cave-in to North Korea. Japan and South Korea — actual allies, unlike France and Germany — were furious. Even Hans Blix thought we were being patsies.

If you need any more evidence that it was a rotten deal, The New York Times hailed it as "a resounding triumph."

At the time, people like William Safire were screaming from the rooftops that allowing North Korea to escape weapons inspections for five years would "preclude a pre-emptive strike by us if North Korea, in the next U.S. president's administration, breaks its agreement to freeze additional bomb-making."

And then on Oct. 17, 2002 — under a new administration, you'll note — The New York Times reported on the front page, so you couldn't have missed it: "Confronted by new American intelligence, North Korea has admitted that it has been conducting a major clandestine nuclear weapons development program for the past several years."

So when it comes to North Korea, I believe the Democrats might want to maintain a discreet silence, lest anyone ask, "Hey, did you guys do anything with North Korea?"

But by Richardson's lights, the only reason Kim Jong Il is testing nukes is because Bush called him evil. He said, "When you call him axis of evil or a tyrant, you know, he just goes crazy." This is the sort of idiocy you expect to hear from an illiterate like Keith Olbermann, not someone who might know people who read newspapers.

Richardson also blames the war in Iraq, bleating that the poor North Koreans feel "that there's too much attention on the Middle East, on Iraq. So it's a cry for attention." If Kim just wanted our attention, he could have started dating Lindsay Lohan. But Richardson says Kim "psychologically feels he's been dissed, that he's not treated with respect."

Damn that Bush! If only he had ignored the crazy Muslims and dedicated himself into sending flowers (and more nuclear reactors!) to North Korea, we could be actively helping Kim develop his nukes like the Clinton administration did.

As Richardson said, Kim "wants us to negotiate with him directly, as we did in the Clinton administration."

To go on TV and propose negotiating with North Korea like Clinton did without ever mentioning that North Korea cheated on that agreement before the ink was dry would be like denouncing American aggression against Japan in 1942 and neglecting to mention Pearl Harbor. Anyone who is either that stupid or that disingenuous should not be allowed on TV.

When pressed by CNN's Anderson Cooper about the failed deal, Richardson lied, claiming the 1994 deal prevented the North Koreans from building nukes "for eight years" — i.e., right up until the day The New York Times reported the North Koreans had been developing nukes "for the past several years."

Kim is crazier than any leader even South America has been able to produce. In fact, he's so crazy, we might be able to get the Democrats to take action. Someone tell Nancy Pelosi that the "Dear Leader" is an actual pederast. Then we'll at least be able to read his instant messages.
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Yes the little man in the jumpsuit in Korea is a ' prick' and the whole world knows it. But talk to him and find out what it will take to calm him down. Last time I looked Bush can not read minds....so what is there to loose??

Hey, I know you dislike me due to my dislike of Bush and that I like Clinton. Big deal...at least you know where my stance will be...I won't be changing back and forth! So..cut and paste away! :wink:
 

Mrs.Greg

Well-known member
I watched an interview with Lisa Ling,she was in Korea under the pretence she was helping an eye surgeon out.... :shock: The man is TOTALLY crazy and has his WHOLE country brainwashed....scary,scary stuff
 

Mrs.Greg

Well-known member
I watched an interview with Lisa Ling,she was in Korea under the pretence she was helping an eye surgeon out.... :shock: The man is TOTALLY crazy and has his WHOLE country brainwashed....scary,scary stuff
 

Mike

Well-known member
Yes the little man in the jumpsuit in Korea is a ' prick' and the whole world knows it. But talk to him and find out what it will take to calm him down. Last time I looked Bush can not read minds....so what is there to loose??

What is there to lose?
Maybe the BILLIONS that Clinton threw away over there?

There is no negotiating with terrorists, PERIOD!

You cannot win! All he wants is money.
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Oh yeah...and there was not ONE...mind you ONE other president you considered " BAD" other than Clinton????

You people have got to get a life and quit blaming Clinton for every dog that craps in your yard. This is on the edge of obsession!!

I know..I got it!!!!. I'm adding onto my house and found out they have discontinued the type of siding I used before....damn that Bill Clinton...I'm SURE he had something to do with that...i just know it!! :roll: :roll: :roll:

You a mind reader also there Mikey??? How do you know what it will take till you talk to some one and see what's up??
 

Mike

Well-known member
Oh yeah...and there was not ONE...mind you ONE other president you considered " BAD" other than Clinton????

I can think of one other that was worse......................................


















Jimmy Carter!
 

jodywy

Well-known member
Mike said:
Oh yeah...and there was not ONE...mind you ONE other president you considered " BAD" other than Clinton????

I can think of one other that was worse......................................


















Jimmy Carter!
yup that grain embargo to USSR brought down all commodity prices. Punch a few numbers and rescission seem to fallow after a long low (loss) in Ag commodities
 

RoperAB

Well-known member
Well what can be done?
Canada has everything tied up in Afghanistan. Yeah I know we are no superpower. The other so called allies <dutch, french, german>are doing nothing in Afghanistan except staying on their bases and not fighting or patroling or doing anything. So even though the other allied countries could contribute I just dont see this ever happening. BTW victory in Afghanistan is no sure thing. You know, look back at Colonial days. It worked with some cultures and people but not with others. Some parts of the world are always going to be a toilet if you have large populations of certain cultures. Look at Africa. That whole continate is a disaster. Dont blame it on the white man either. There isnt one place in Africa today that was not better off when it was a colony. Look at Eithiopia. It was never a colony but yet the people there are worse off than anywhere on earth. So dont blame "whitey".

As far as the States go, you guys are tied down in Afghanistan and Iraq.
What are your options? You could bomb old heck out of them but im not sure this would be a good option right now.
Really something has to be done because if nothing is done this will send a bad message to Iran.
So that leaves the British, Aussies and Israel. If Israel gets into it its WW3 and im not sure what the capibilities of the commonwealth countries are right now.
 

Latest posts

Top