• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

What do you think about this?

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
This is the guy that broke the Susan Rice story.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxQd2Bitqic

Remember Lolita Express and billionaire Epstein who was caught red handed and who did no real time?

Along with Bill's many, many trips with him....


Remember Hillary's state department covering up child trafficking?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HadGh0LcXxs


I think it's going to have legs and be a part of what is wrong with Washington.
 

Steve

Well-known member
The reports and allegations have been around awhile..
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/state-department-memo-reveals-possible-cover-ups-halted-investigations/

and unless the media thinks it is more important then a Trump donor maybe meeting a person who knows a friend of Putin's for lunch in some island then it will go nowhere again... :roll: but a US official says they are investigating it,so it must be news.. and more important the allegations of sexual misconduct by goverment and political appointees.. :roll: :mad:

Draining that swamp will not be easy.
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
Interested that you say US official...

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/04/04/susan-rice-confirms-her-unmasking-requests-were-for-president-obamas-daily-briefing-pdb/
 

Steve

Well-known member
iwannabeacowboy said:
Interested that you say US official...

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/04/04/susan-rice-confirms-her-unmasking-requests-were-for-president-obamas-daily-briefing-pdb/


Yep,.. :? I like the conservative tree house, real helpful, I am sure it was someone on here who led me to them. (thanks)

Mitchell’s use of wording carefully guides Susan Rice through the narrow path of self-incrimination by providing plausible deniability for verbal missteps.

And sometimes in that context, in order to understand the importance in the report – and assess it’s significance, it was necessary to find out or request, who that U.S. official was.”

OK, so right there, in the very beginning of the forward narrative, Susan Rice is confirming the “unmasking” request(s) which can be pinned upon her,

yea she knew she was the one who did the request,.. but, she spread the blame well...


Pay attention to that last part. According to the Washington Post outline Obama’s PDB’s were going to: “Deputy Secretaries of national security departments”.

Today, Susan Rice defined the Obama national security departments to include: “State” – “Defense” (Pentagon includes NSA) and “CIA”….

So under Obama’s watch Deputy Asst. Secretaries of Defense had daily access to the PDB. And who was an Obama Deputy Secretary of Defense?

See how that works?

[Also note how when shifting from rehearsed talking point (script) to cognitive explanation of Rices’ point , the noun shifts from “U.S. Person” to “U.S. Official”.]

“I received those reports, as did other officials, and there were occasions when I would receive a report in which, uh, a ‘U.S Person’ was referred to. Name, uh, not provided, just ‘U.S. Person’.

And sometimes in that context, in order to understand the importance in the report – and assess its significance, it was necessary to find out or request, who that U.S. official was.”

It’s subtle (like a Freudian slip), but Rice accidentally outlines her filter, her psychological trigger, for when to request the unmasking. She’s looking for the politics behind the intelligence. She’s looking for “U.S. Officials” in masked intelligence reports.

well worth the read.. thanks for the link..
 

mrj

Well-known member
It really is hard for this 'elderly' woman who has led a relatively sheltered life 'out in the sticks' of rural western SD, yet searched out written and later, radio, then,TV news and info sources since maybe age 8, it still is nearly incomprehensible that such awful people exist as those who practice child sex, let alone those who lure other weak minded adults into it for the purposes of controlling them politically.

Our lone SD Representative, Kristi Noem has for quite some time, promoted action to stop such abuses of children and even adults coerced or forced in whatever way into that 'trade', so have been aware of it.

But on the level exposed in that video, it still is very difficult to understand that there really are people willing to promote such evil, for at least equally evil purposes, including manipulation of politicians and politics. Surely, if those involved, both coercing, and the politicians coerced, could be exposed, their political lives should be over, and they should spend time in particularly severe prisons, shouldn't they????

mrj
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
mrj, I tend to believe that there is just too much smoke for there to not be a fire.

There was a time during the election, that some tried to tie Trump to Epstein as well- a projection tactic we've seen used over and over. And the multiple woman who came forth claiming they were sexual victims.... it's obvious that this is another weaponized tool. We saw it used openly on the national stage for the entire world to see.

It was damaging for Trump and these were grown women, how much more so for someoe that is not financially secure, unable to secure the type of protection Trump has, lacks the public presence for garilla journalists to investigate the truth, and could be looking at a lifetime of jail whether the pictures/actions are fraudulent or real.

At minimum, our excessive surveilence is dangerous to our citizens on a personal level, and our country on a macro level.

As far as sentencing goes, if these type of crimes are brought to light, and the perpetrators are sentenced to prison, these things seem to work themselves out in there.

I couldn't be an investigator for such crimes. I'm afraid many pedophilia cases would end up as missing persons cases.
 

Latest posts

Top