There is no diversion on my part, agman. Just an accusation by you that I diverted. The points are not diversions at all.
Again, I am glad to concede the technical definition the fed has for personal savings is not the definition most common people have. I will have to say that I also agree with the current and past fed chairmen on the issue of the fallacy of your logic in the argument and your conclusion.
Again, I am glad to concede the technical definition the fed has for personal savings is not the definition most common people have. I will have to say that I also agree with the current and past fed chairmen on the issue of the fallacy of your logic in the argument and your conclusion.