• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

When takers outvote makers

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
When takers outvote makers

By Jim Burkee

Posted: Aug. 8, 2009

Lost in the vigorous national debate over health care reform is the potentially transformative effect any major legislation will have on the nature of American democracy. The deeper question we should be debating is this: What happens to our democracy when a majority of American voters depend on the government for a paycheck?

Our nation's founding generation was profoundly aware of the relationship between economic independence and democratic participation. In classical Athens, Aristotle had argued that political participation required property ownership, since those who did not own property "have no share in the state." Likewise, our founders largely restricted voting rights to those who owned property, believing that a voter's independence of judgment and desire for liberal self-government was found only in those not economically dependent on others.

Political philosopher Isabel Paterson expressed similar concerns during World War II, as government grew to unprecedented size. Dividing society into three categories - economic producers, those who depend on government and redistributors - she asked, as Aristotle and our founders had, what happens to democratic society when non-producers can vote themselves benefits at the expense of the producing class?

We're about to find out.

In 2008, just under half of all voters were either receiving Social Security; drawing a paycheck from federal, state or local government; or dependent on state assistance such as food stamps. Last year, about 210 million Americans were eligible to vote. Of those, at least 42 million were adults on Social Security (primarily retirees and disabled workers). Add to that almost 15 million federal government employees, 16 million state and local employees and 30 million recipients of food stamps, and just over 100 million Americans - just under half of all eligible voters - are directly dependent on government.

Even before the debate over national health care, that ratio of independent-to-dependent, or private vs. public sector voters, was about to change. The Social Security Administration projects that within 25 years, the number of retirees will almost double, from today's 39 million to 75 million. The number of disabled recipients of Social Security is also expected to soar to nearly one in four working-age Americans.

Based on Social Security Administration projections, there will be as many as 100 million Americans drawing a Social Security check by 2034. Even if the number of federal and state employees and recipients of food stamps remains static over the next 25 years (hardly likely), the proportion of government-dependent Americans to the overall voting-age population will reach nearly 70% by 2034, or 161 million out of 233 million eligible voters.

Government-dependent voters are much less likely than private-sector voters to favor cost-cutting reforms. Although older voters (baby boomers and above) split evenly in the 2008 presidential election, precious few favor reforming Social Security - or even acknowledge that it is headed toward insolvency.

An April 2009 survey found that most baby boomers - Republican, Democrat and independent - favor raising taxes to keep Social Security benefits unchanged, instead of reducing benefits.

In layman's terms, when they are retired and no longer paying taxes, government-dependent retirees favor raising everyone else's taxes to pay for their benefits.

We already know that federal employees tend to favor bigger government since their livelihoods are directly affected by federal spending. The Association of Federal Government Employees, which already has over 700,000 employees, promotes higher federal employee pay, lower federal employee health insurance premiums and bigger government - at the expense of a rapidly shrinking private sector.

The health care reform proposal making its way through the House of Representatives threatens to dramatically aggravate that imbalance by driving insurance companies into extinction and federalizing the nation's health care system, transforming 14.5 million private sector health industry workers into federal employees. Such a dramatic shift would move the ratio of public-sector voters to over 75% - and that doesn't even include farmers dependent on agricultural subsidies.

Before we reach this demographic tipping point, we need a national discussion about the consequences of having such a historically high ratio of dependent voters.

Like it or not, over the next two decades America will become a true welfare state. In the debate over national health care we need to decide what that will mean for our democracy.

Jim Burkee is an associate professor of history at Concordia University Wisconsin. He can be reached at [email protected] Jim Burkee is an associate professor of history at Concordia University Wisconsin. He can be reached at [email protected]
 

burnt

Well-known member
How do we know when we have passed that point? I am made to think that we may have already.

A huge portion of the budget for agriculture on both the federal and provincial levels in Canada is disbursed right in the administrative offices and on contract workers.

In far too many cases, funding for various initiatives is doled out to family and friends without going through a tendering process. A recent example is the E-Health scandal that went down in the past month or two.

Another example is the entrenched bureaucracy that has the authority to impose excessive restrictions and demands on the normal activities of the working people and business operators.

It all comes with a cost - those damned bureaucrats and their plush offices need to be maintained somehow.

Deficit spending can only prop up this unsupportable system for so long.

Inevitably, the system becomes so overburdened by the nonproductive, lecherous and superfluous government trash that feeds off of the honest labor of the working and business class that it will collapse into chaos and eventually, anarchy.

How far are we from that point today?
 
Top