• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Where is Clinton Foundation CEO?

Faster horses

Well-known member
http://www.teaparty.org/report-clinton-foundation-ceo-disappears-media-hiding-really-happened-210112/

As the FBI continues its widespread investigation into the foundation, Braverman’s vanishing act has the internet wondering and the mainstream media curiously disinterested.

(The Stream) – Eric Braverman, the Clinton Foundation CEO from 2013 until 2015, has apparently been missing since October. His absence has fueled speculations in the blogosphere but so far has been ignored by the media.

Some speculate, with good reason, that Braverman may have gone into hiding after an email mentioning his name was released by Wikileaks on October 22 of this year. In the March 2015 email exchange, Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden told Clinton campaign manager and confidant John Podesta there was a mole within the Clinton Foundation. Podesta in his reply told Tanden the mole was Braverman.

Braverman had abruptly resigned from the Clinton Foundation shortly before this email exchange took place. And then, after the email exchange was made public by Wikileaks, Braverman vanished from the public eye.

This seems like a story that someone might want to report.

#Where’sEric: Could Braverman be in FBI Protective Custody?

There are also rumors that Braverman is in FBI protective custody, perhaps in exchange for testifying against the Clintons. Sources within the FBI have said it is likely there will be indictments handed down over the Clinton Foundation’s pay-to-play schemes. Senior FBI officials told CNN that the investigation into the Clinton Foundation had never ended and is still ongoing. According to The Daily Caller News Foundation, that probe now involves as many as five FBI bureaus across the country: New York, Little Rock, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and Miami.

Would the FBI have hustled Braverman to safety once it was known Podesta had pegged him as a mole? This theory seems plausible, given what we know. But there is still no independent evidence of it.
 

mustang

Well-known member
With the Clinton's History as it is,, one might check under the last bit of concrete work done on the Clinton Library. " I know nothing."
 

Tam

Well-known member
If Braverman is not dead by the hands of the Clinton machine already the FBI better have him hid for his own protection. There has already been one questionable death linked to Clintons failed attempt to win the WH.


Seth Rich mysteriously died by a gunshot to the back after the DNC emails started hitting the air waves by the hands of Wikileaks. There was a reward for information offered by the authorities but what is even stranger was Wikileaks offered a reward for someone that worked for the DNC. WHY? Could it have been because he, not Russia, was the one that handed over the emails and wikileaks knew him. Assuage said it wasn't Russia so could it have been Rich and Hillary's protectors found out and got to him before he could leak anything else?

Again if Braverman is not already under a bed of concrete or buried in the woods that Hillary is now taking walks in to forget her lose, the FBI better have him in a bunker somewhere.
 

Latest posts

Top