A
Anonymous
Guest
Tim H (to Sandcheska): "your above post seems to imply that you are saying "No,the current firewalls are not adequate to protect consumers from domestic bse". Am I reading that correctly???"
Sandcheska (in response): "Yes, you are correct."
Sandcheska : "Somebody has finally figured out what R-CALF has been saying for three years"
Leo McDonnell said we have the safest beef in the world and said that if we had a domestic case of bse in the US we could look the consumers right in the eye and tell them our beef is safe due to our firewalls.
Meanwhile, you are saying that R-CALF's position is that our firewalls are inadequate to protect consumers from domestic bse.
How can you claim R-CALF's position as "our firewalls are inadequate to protect consumers" when Leo McDonnell has directly contradicted you Sandcheska?
So which way is it? Is R-CALF's position that our firewalls are not adequate or that as Leo has stated, our beef is safe due to our firewalls?
~SH~