as we prepare to get entangled in another middle-eastern war... I have a serious question..
I have seen the bodies wrapped in white.. some small children,.. and I am outraged... but I am not sure who to be outraged with..
the goverment fighting a war against rebels.. many of whom are foreign soldiers/terrorists.
or the rebels of which many are foreign soldiers/terrorists.
to put it quite bluntly.. I do not trust either side..
and while I detest dictators.. and dictatorial governments.. even if fairly elected.. I still detest terrorists more..
if a faction in this country started a war today.,... and foreign fighters, soldiers and terrorists were brought in to help take it down.. I would have to side with dictator Obama.
but that doesn't answer my question.
Who is "responsible" for the chemical attack?
is it a goverment who was recently beating back the rebels and foreign fighters/terrorists?
or is it the rebels and foreign fighters/terrorists?
the goverment doesn't seem to have many upsides on this one.. first,.. few are siding with them anyways.. (other then Iran and Russia),..
so why drag out chemical weapons if they think Obama will strike back..
unless they think Obama is weak and will just have another speech..
I don't trust the rebels,.. and assorted other bad guys,.. and considering just a short time back they were doomed without our weapons and help... they might be desperate,.. and take up Obama on his threat to intervene if chemical weapons are used..
so far no one has definitely ruled the earlier small chemical weapons attacks were made by the goverment..
Pentagon Preps for Strike on Syria
CBS News reports the Pentagon is prepping cruise missiles for a possible attack “on Syrian government forces,”
I have seen the bodies wrapped in white.. some small children,.. and I am outraged... but I am not sure who to be outraged with..
the goverment fighting a war against rebels.. many of whom are foreign soldiers/terrorists.
or the rebels of which many are foreign soldiers/terrorists.
to put it quite bluntly.. I do not trust either side..
and while I detest dictators.. and dictatorial governments.. even if fairly elected.. I still detest terrorists more..
if a faction in this country started a war today.,... and foreign fighters, soldiers and terrorists were brought in to help take it down.. I would have to side with dictator Obama.
but that doesn't answer my question.
Who is "responsible" for the chemical attack?
is it a goverment who was recently beating back the rebels and foreign fighters/terrorists?
or is it the rebels and foreign fighters/terrorists?
the goverment doesn't seem to have many upsides on this one.. first,.. few are siding with them anyways.. (other then Iran and Russia),..
so why drag out chemical weapons if they think Obama will strike back..
unless they think Obama is weak and will just have another speech..
I don't trust the rebels,.. and assorted other bad guys,.. and considering just a short time back they were doomed without our weapons and help... they might be desperate,.. and take up Obama on his threat to intervene if chemical weapons are used..
so far no one has definitely ruled the earlier small chemical weapons attacks were made by the goverment..