I posted a while back about a Huffington Post article that claimed it was the Republicans that except corruption as a fact of life and will vote for a candidate that is less than honest but the Democrats wouldn't. But look at the stories in the news right now and see if that is at all true.
Hillary has been proven to be a liar in the Benghazi terrorist attack as she was a willing participant of a coverup when it comes to the reasoning behind Benghazi. She openly claimed REPEATEDLY that the murders were due to a protest over a video. We all know she and Obama knew that was not true from within hours of the attack starting due to sworn testimony. We also know that it was her State Department that denied repeatedly requested Security due to the growing dangers in the area, that could have prevented the attack. Every other country pulled their officials from the area due to the terrorist attacks on and around their consulates in Benghazi even the Red Cross left the area but Hillary kept the Americans in the area as she was pushing a story of success with the Libyan mess her and Obama were involved it. If she all of a sudden pulled them it would have destroyed her story. Just like if the DOJ's Fast and furious guns were not found in Mexico then her story of all the illegal guns in Mexico were coming from the US hence the US needed GUN CONTROL LAWS, story would and was destroyed.
Christie is accused of Bridgegate that he claims he had nothing to do with and as of yet nothing proves he did know about it and he has fired those in his administration that were involved. When that story was starting to die down, getting less media coverage, the Dems needed another accusation so another Dem Mayor claims the administration withheld Sandy relief funds to get support for a pet project. To back this accusation they have a personal journal entry (as if a person wanting to get in on the action can't fake a journal entry :roll: ) The person accused comes out and claims she is innocent of wrong doing and will be the one with a damaged reputation but the Dem will walk away like nothing happen if no proof is provided.
Now look at the polls prior to the Bridgegate scandal and long after the Benghazi coverup, Christie was leading Hillary in a presidential matchup by 2 points BUT now after Bridgegate Hillary is again leading in the polls.
So ask yourself with all we know about Hillary's involvement with Benghazi thanks to the sworn testimony and the Senate report and the little we know about Christies accused involvement who is the party the EXCEPTS CORRUPTION/LYING in their candidates?
This has been going on for as long as anyone can remember likely as when the Kennedy's were tied up in sex scandals, drug use, boozing and a car crash that resulted in a death, the Dems looked the other way and elected them to lifelong terms in the Federal government. Yet Dems actually claim Republicans except corruption and support it. :shock: :roll:
So when somebody talks about the Dems having MORALS. PLEASE LAUGH IN THEIR FACE.
Hillary has been proven to be a liar in the Benghazi terrorist attack as she was a willing participant of a coverup when it comes to the reasoning behind Benghazi. She openly claimed REPEATEDLY that the murders were due to a protest over a video. We all know she and Obama knew that was not true from within hours of the attack starting due to sworn testimony. We also know that it was her State Department that denied repeatedly requested Security due to the growing dangers in the area, that could have prevented the attack. Every other country pulled their officials from the area due to the terrorist attacks on and around their consulates in Benghazi even the Red Cross left the area but Hillary kept the Americans in the area as she was pushing a story of success with the Libyan mess her and Obama were involved it. If she all of a sudden pulled them it would have destroyed her story. Just like if the DOJ's Fast and furious guns were not found in Mexico then her story of all the illegal guns in Mexico were coming from the US hence the US needed GUN CONTROL LAWS, story would and was destroyed.
Christie is accused of Bridgegate that he claims he had nothing to do with and as of yet nothing proves he did know about it and he has fired those in his administration that were involved. When that story was starting to die down, getting less media coverage, the Dems needed another accusation so another Dem Mayor claims the administration withheld Sandy relief funds to get support for a pet project. To back this accusation they have a personal journal entry (as if a person wanting to get in on the action can't fake a journal entry :roll: ) The person accused comes out and claims she is innocent of wrong doing and will be the one with a damaged reputation but the Dem will walk away like nothing happen if no proof is provided.
Now look at the polls prior to the Bridgegate scandal and long after the Benghazi coverup, Christie was leading Hillary in a presidential matchup by 2 points BUT now after Bridgegate Hillary is again leading in the polls.
So ask yourself with all we know about Hillary's involvement with Benghazi thanks to the sworn testimony and the Senate report and the little we know about Christies accused involvement who is the party the EXCEPTS CORRUPTION/LYING in their candidates?
This has been going on for as long as anyone can remember likely as when the Kennedy's were tied up in sex scandals, drug use, boozing and a car crash that resulted in a death, the Dems looked the other way and elected them to lifelong terms in the Federal government. Yet Dems actually claim Republicans except corruption and support it. :shock: :roll:
So when somebody talks about the Dems having MORALS. PLEASE LAUGH IN THEIR FACE.