• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Who is this guy?

Econ101

Well-known member
You are here: GIPSA Home /
News and Events


Packers and Stockyards Program Deputy Administrator Chosen


Washington, D.C., May 24, 2006 - Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administrator (GIPSA) James E. Link today announced the selection of Alan Christian as Deputy Administrator of the Packers and Stockyards Program (P&SP).


''I'm thrilled to have Alan Christian join the GIPSA team. He is a committed public servant with an invaluable working knowledge of investigative processes, '' said Link. ''Alan's leadership and management experience within the Department will be a tremendous asset to GIPSA and the organizational changes the Agency will be undertaking in response to the recent OIG report. ''


Christian currently serves as the Director of Investigative and Enforcement Services with the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). Formerly, Christian was a Regional Director for APHIS' Regulatory Enforcement Program and a Senior Investigator with APHIS Veterinary Services.


Christian earned a Bachelor of Arts in Zoology from The University of South Florida in Tampa, Florida, and a Master of Science in Biology from Worcester State College in Worcester, Massachusetts.


GIPSA's Packers and Stockyards Program protects the integrity of the livestock, meat, and poultry markets for the benefit of American Agriculture. P&SP administers the Packers and Stockyards (P&S) Act of 1921. In the words of the Congress, the purpose of the P&S Act is ''to assure fair competition and fair trade practices, to safeguard farmers and ranchers. . .to protect consumers. . .and to protect members of the livestock, meat, and poultry industries from unfair, deceptive, unjustly discriminatory and monopolistic practices. . . .'' P&SP's major enforcement areas are payment protection, unfair, deceptive, and fraudulent practices, and competition. Further information on the Packers and Stockyards Program is available at the gipsa web site.


GIPSA Release #47-06
Amanda Taylor 202-720-0219
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Christian currently serves as the Director of Investigative and Enforcement Services with the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). Formerly, Christian was a Regional Director for APHIS' Regulatory Enforcement Program and a Senior Investigator with APHIS Veterinary Services.

Never heard of the fellow...The good news is that in his resume they released, I saw nowhere any past connection with the Packers or their affiliated groups such as AMI or NCBA...... :)
 

Econ101

Well-known member
Wrong guy on initial post here is some of his work posted below.


[Federal Register: November 26, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 228)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 70673-70674]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26no02-1]




========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________


This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.


The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.


========================================================================






[[Page 70673]]






DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Office of the Secretary


7 CFR Part 1


[Docket No. 02-077-1]



Subpoenas Issued Under the Animal Health Protection Act


AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, USDA.


ACTION: Final rule.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SUMMARY: We are amending the administrative regulations of the Office
of the Secretary of Agriculture to reflect the subpoena provisions of
the Animal Health Protection Act. Under the Animal Health Protection
Act, the Secretary of Agriculture can subpoena witnesses and documents
relating to the administration or enforcement of the Animal Health
Protection Act or any matter being investigated in connection with the
Animal Health Protection Act. This final rule is necessary to establish
regulations governing the issuance of subpoenas under this authority.
We are also amending the administrative regulations, where necessary,
by including references to the Animal Health Protection Act, the Plant
Protection Act, and Title V of the Agricultural Risk Protection Act of
2000, and removing references to statutes repealed by the Plant
Protection Act.


EFFECTIVE DATE: November 26, 2002.


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Alan R. Christian, Director,
Investigative and Enforcement Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 85,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-8684.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:


Background


The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), through its
Veterinary Services (VS) program, regulates animals, animal products,
and other articles to prevent the introduction or spread of animal
diseases and pests. When it appears that VS regulations have been
violated, APHIS conducts an investigation. In conducting the
investigation, it may be necessary to issue a subpoena for testimony or
for documents and other records.
Title X, subtitle E, of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act
of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-171, 7 U.S.C. 8301-8317), known as the Animal
Health Protection Act (AHPA), updates and consolidates a number of
animal health statutes. Under section 10415 of the AHPA (7 U.S.C.
8314), the Secretary of Agriculture has the authority to issue
subpoenas for testimony and for documents and other records relating to
administration or enforcement of the AHPA. The authority for signing
subpoenas has been delegated from the Secretary to the Under Secretary
of Marketing and Regulatory Programs, and from the Under Secretary of
Marketing and Regulatory Programs to the Administrator, APHIS (7 CFR
2.22 and 2.80).
The AHPA requires that we publish procedures for issuing subpoenas.
According to Sec. 10415(a)(2)(E) of the AHPA (7 U.S.C. 8314), the
procedures must include a requirement that subpoenas be reviewed for
legal sufficiency and signed by the Secretary. The Act further requires
that ``if the authority to sign a subpoena is delegated to an agency
other than the Office of Administrative Law Judges, the agency
receiving the delegation shall seek review of the subpoena for legal
sufficiency outside that agency.''
To comply with these requirements, we are amending 7 CFR 1.29 and
1.131. Section 1.29 governs the issuance of subpoenas relating to
investigations under statutes administered by the Secretary. Paragraph
(3) states that the Office of the General Counsel, USDA, will review
subpoenas for legal sufficiency that are issued under certain statutes.
We are amending paragraph (3) to state that the Office of the General
Counsel will also review for legal sufficiency subpoenas that are
issued under the AHPA.
Section 1.131 comes under subpart H of part 1. Subpart H contains
rules of practice for formal adjudicatory proceedings instituted by the
Secretary under various statutes. We are amending Sec. 1.131 to add
the AHPA to the list of covered statutes. We are also updating Sec.
1.131 by removing references to statutes that were repealed by the
Plant Protection Act (PPA, 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772).
We are also updating Sec. 1.183, which comes under subpart J of
part 1. Subpart J contains procedures relating to awards under the
Equal Access to Justice Act in proceedings before the Department. We
are amending Sec. 1.183 by adding the AHPA and Title V of the
Agricultural Risk Protection Act of 2000, section 501(a) (7 U.S.C.
2279e) to the list of covered statutes and by revising the citations
provided in the entry for the PPA.
This rule relates to internal agency management. Therefore, this
rule is exempt from the provisions of Executive Orders 12866 and 12988.
Moreover, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, notice of proposed rulemaking and
opportunity for comment are not required for this rule, and it may be
made effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. In addition, under 5 U.S.C. 804, this rule is not subject to
congressional review under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-121. Finally, this action is not a
rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, and thus is exempt from the provisions of that Act.


Paperwork Reduction Act


This rule contains no information collections or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).


List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1


Administrative practice and procedure, Agriculture, Antitrust,
Blind, Claims, Concessions, Cooperatives, Equal access to justice,
Federal buildings and facilities, Freedom of information, Lawyers,
Privacy.


Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 1 as follows:


PART 1--ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS


1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:


Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, unless otherwise noted.


[[Page 70674]]


Subpart B--Departmental Proceedings




Sec. 1.29 [Amended]


2. In Sec. 1.29, paragraph (a)(3) is amended by adding the words
``Animal Health Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 8301-8317),'' before the word
``Plant'', and by adding a comma before the word ``or''.


Subpart H--Rules of Practice Governing Formal Adjudicatory
Proceedings Instituted by the Secretary Under Various Statutes


3. The authority citation for Subpart H is revised to read as
follows:


Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 61, 87e, 228, 268, 499o,
608c(14), 1592, 1624(b), 2151, 2279e, 2621, 2714, 2908, 3812, 4610,
4815, 4910, 6009, 6107, 6207, 6307, 6411, 6808, 7107, 7734, 8313; 15
U.S.C. 1828; 16 U.S.C. 620d, 1540(f), 3373; 21 U.S.C. 104, 111, 117,
120, 122, 127, 134e, 134f, 135a, 154, 463(b), 621, 1043; 43 U.S.C.
1740; 7 CFR 2.35, 2.41.




Sec. 1.131 [Amended]


4. In Sec. 1.131, paragraph (a) is amended by adding, in
alphabetical order, ``Animal Health Protection Act, section 10414 (7
U.S.C. 8313).'', and by removing ``Act of August 20, 1912, commonly
known as the Plant Quarantine Act, section 10, as amended (7 U.S.C.
163, 164).'', ``Act of January 31, 1942, as amended (7 U.S.C. 149).'',
and ``Federal Plant Pest Act, section 108, as amended (7 U.S.C.
150gg).''.


Subpart J--Procedures Relating to Awards Under the Equal Access to
Justice Act in Proceedings Before the Department


5. The authority citation for Subpart J continues to read as
follows:


Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(1).




Sec. 1.183 [Amended]


6. In Sec. 1.183, paragraph (a)(2) is amended by adding, in
alphabetical order, ``Animal Health Protection Act, sections 10414 and
10415 (7 U.S.C. 8313 and 8314)'' and ``Title V of the Agricultural Risk
Protection Act of 2000, section 501(a) (7 U.S.C. 2279e)''; and in the
entry for the Plant Protection Act, by removing the citations ``7
U.S.C. 2279e, 7734(b), 7736'' and adding the citations ``7 U.S.C. 7734,
7735, and 7736'' in their place.


Dated: November 20, 2002.
Ann M. Veneman,
Secretary of Agriculture.
[FR Doc. 02-29985 Filed 11-25-02; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
 

Econ101

Well-known member
The OGC in the USDA is part of the problem. This guy seems to have worked with them and has his papers reviewed by the OGC attorneys. JoAnn Waterfield was an OGC attorney before her post at GIPSA.

If you are trying to "fix" an agency, why would you keep getting people from the same source where the previous problems originate? The previous GAO reports on GIPSA recommended changing around personell from outside of the agencies to prevent agency capture. Does this fit that call?

It just seems like they are playing musical chairs over there. With as big of problems as were identified by the OIG report, they should have traded in all of the employees and started over and put in a few "spies" to catch corruption if it surfaced.

I just don't know why we put up with this. It seems like they are planning on doing the same ole same ole.
 
Top