• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Who will benifit?

Steve

Well-known member
I just read an interesting article concerning Syria.. and it makes alot of good points...

In Libya,... Gaddafi claimed the foreign fighters / terrorists were destabilizing his country,.. and for as much as i disliked the nut-job,.. he was right...

in the end, Obama sided with the foreign fighters / terrorists who ultimately attacked US..

the same is happening in Syria.. same claims of foreign fighters / terrorists.. and sadly probably the same end results..

this article goes in a bit deeper into who will ultimately benefit.. (and it ain't US) it is worth reading the entire article..
Who Benefits From A US War With Syria?

Someone wants to get the United States into a war with Syria very, very badly. Cui bono is an old Latin phrase that is still commonly used, and it roughly means "to whose benefit?" The key to figuring out who is really behind the push for war is to look at who will benefit from that war. If a full-blown war erupts between the United States and Syria, it will not be good for the United States, it will not be good for Israel, it will not be good for Syria, it will not be good for Iran and it will not be good for Hezbollah. The party that stands to benefit the most is Saudi Arabia, and they won't even be doing any of the fighting. They have been pouring billions of dollars into the conflict in Syria, but so far they have not been successful in their attempts to overthrow the Assad regime. Now the Saudis are trying to play their trump card - the U.S. military. If the Saudis are successful, they will get to pit the two greatest long-term strategic enemies of Sunni Islam against each other - the U.S. and Israel on one side and Shia Islam on the other. In such a scenario, the more damage that both sides do to each other the happier the Sunnis will be.

There would be other winners from a U.S. war with Syria as well. For example, it is well-known that Qatar wants to run a natural gas pipeline out of the Persian Gulf, through Syria and into Europe. That is why Qatar has also been pouring billions of dollars into the civil war in Syria. So if it is really Saudi Arabia and Qatar that want to overthrow the Assad regime, why does the United States have to do the fighting?

Even with Obama's plan to not do much of anything still may blow up in his face...
But if there is a response, and a U.S. naval vessel gets hit, or American blood is spilled, or rockets start raining down on Tel Aviv, the U.S. will then be engaged in a full-blown war.

For the United States, there really is no good outcome in Syria. If we attack and Assad stays in power, that is a bad outcome for the United States. If we help overthrow the Assad regime, the rebels take control. But they would be even worse than Assad. They have pledged loyalty to al-Qaeda, and they are rabidly anti-American, rabidly anti-Israel and rabidly anti-western. So why in the world should the United States get involved?

Syria has already threatened to attack Israeli cities if the U.S. attacks Syria. If Syrian missiles start landing in the heart of Tel Aviv, Israel will respond. And if any of those missiles have unconventional warheads, Israel will respond by absolutely destroying Damascus.
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/who-benefits-us-war-with-syria/

there is that prophecy again,.. Maybe Obama had a dose of religion and decided he didn't want to start WW3?

some more reading,.. I don't agree with it all,.. or all of their conclusions,.. but it does lay out how the current events may take place.. add in chemical or nuclear weapons and the abandoned cities and lands start looking possible.

http://www.raptureready.com/featured/gillette/Isaiah_17.html

I pray they are wrong....
 
Top