hypocritexposer
Well-known member

Progressives like OT and flounder want more tax revenue, so government agencies like the GSA can waste $billions annually.
Tam said:Where do you think Mr Neely got the idea that government employees deserve to spend Tax Payer money on ritzy hotel rooms, all the booze you can drink, taking family members along on expense paid trips and bonuses for a shameful job?
I'm betting this is seen as a trickle down entitlement mentality, when you have a President and First Lady that spend tax payer money like the party only comes around once and you might as well enjoy it as long as it lasts. :x
Tam said:Did you hear that the Secret Service that had the 20 some "women" in their hotel rooms in Colombia were just watching TV with them. :wink: I guess the going rate for "Watching TV" is now $47 dollars, and the Secret Service expected that service to be as free as Sandra Flukes Birth Control. :roll:
How many more scandels are going to come out before Nov.
backhoeboogie said:Tam said:Did you hear that the Secret Service that had the 20 some "women" in their hotel rooms in Colombia were just watching TV with them. :wink: I guess the going rate for "Watching TV" is now $47 dollars, and the Secret Service expected that service to be as free as Sandra Flukes Birth Control. :roll:
How many more scandels are going to come out before Nov.
You can bet the situation is much worse. Can you imagine what it would be like if the media probed as deep here as it did with Palin? Of course, the media is downplaying this.
hypocritexposer said:backhoeboogie said:Tam said:Did you hear that the Secret Service that had the 20 some "women" in their hotel rooms in Colombia were just watching TV with them. :wink: I guess the going rate for "Watching TV" is now $47 dollars, and the Secret Service expected that service to be as free as Sandra Flukes Birth Control. :roll:
How many more scandels are going to come out before Nov.
You can bet the situation is much worse. Can you imagine what it would be like if the media probed as deep here as it did with Palin? Of course, the media is downplaying this.
Who would have ever thought that it would be the obama admin. ordering these agencies to take a "4 yr coffee break" to objectify underage women, in their "war on women"
this is clearly Bush's fault
backhoeboogie said:Obama did say, "I will be angry." There was no mention of folks losing jobs and such. Just, "I will be angry IF this turns out to be true."
11 of them were in the partaking - maybe more. Sounds like some were not even women but rather underage girls.
Faster horses said:I too, think if he can make the military look bad, he'll go for it.
(never let a crisis go to waste~)
What I'm wondering, and I realize this deal with the SS is serious,
but no one was killed as in Fast and Furious. Obama said something
regarding the SS deal, to the effect that "I will be angry...
those that work for the people of the United States
are held to the highest standard".......baloney.........look at Holder.
He still hasn't come clean. I think Fast and Furious deserves more
play than the SS or the GSA. GSA spent all that money....so.......
aren't we used to that? It was atrocious the amount they spent
and what the investigation is coming up with, BUT, still no one
was killed as in Fast and Furious. They NEED to get that settled--
run Holder out of town. Sometimes I think these other things are
a diversion..............but what do I know? I only know I'm furious about
nothing being done in regard to Fast and Furious. and Holder
is still in office.![]()
hypocritexposer said:Tam said:Where do you think Mr Neely got the idea that government employees deserve to spend Tax Payer money on ritzy hotel rooms, all the booze you can drink, taking family members along on expense paid trips and bonuses for a shameful job?
I'm betting this is seen as a trickle down entitlement mentality, when you have a President and First Lady that spend tax payer money like the party only comes around once and you might as well enjoy it as long as it lasts. :x
This administration needs chaperones for all their "official" and unofficial travels, that's for sure. The 'leadership" sure doesn't seem to set a good example.
They are stealing taxpayer money to party and have a "gay old time"
and people like flounder and OT think it is great and that the taxpayer should give more, so the governmnet is further "enabled"
obama 2012 "yes we can"
![]()
![]()
Chaperones among new Secret Service conduct rules
Published April 28, 2012
Associated Press
WASHINGTON – Embarrassed by a prostitution scandal, the Secret Service will assign chaperones on some trips to enforce new rules of conduct that make clear that excessive drinking, entertaining foreigners in their hotel rooms and cavorting in disreputable establishments are no longer tolerated.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/28/secret-service-new-rules-no-boozing-racy-bars/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fnational+%28Internal+-+US+Latest+-+Text%29#ixzz1tLgMwbhx
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/28/secret-service-new-rules-no-boozing-racy-bars/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fnational+%28Internal+-+US+Latest+-+Text%29#ixzz1tLgGK1nz
hypocritexposer said:hypocritexposer said:Tam said:Where do you think Mr Neely got the idea that government employees deserve to spend Tax Payer money on ritzy hotel rooms, all the booze you can drink, taking family members along on expense paid trips and bonuses for a shameful job?
I'm betting this is seen as a trickle down entitlement mentality, when you have a President and First Lady that spend tax payer money like the party only comes around once and you might as well enjoy it as long as it lasts. :x
This administration needs chaperones for all their "official" and unofficial travels, that's for sure. The 'leadership" sure doesn't seem to set a good example.
They are stealing taxpayer money to party and have a "gay old time"
and people like flounder and OT think it is great and that the taxpayer should give more, so the governmnet is further "enabled"
obama 2012 "yes we can"
![]()
![]()
Chaperones among new Secret Service conduct rules
Published April 28, 2012
Associated Press
WASHINGTON – Embarrassed by a prostitution scandal, the Secret Service will assign chaperones on some trips to enforce new rules of conduct that make clear that excessive drinking, entertaining foreigners in their hotel rooms and cavorting in disreputable establishments are no longer tolerated.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/28/secret-service-new-rules-no-boozing-racy-bars/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fnational+%28Internal+-+US+Latest+-+Text%29#ixzz1tLgMwbhx
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/28/secret-service-new-rules-no-boozing-racy-bars/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fnational+%28Internal+-+US+Latest+-+Text%29#ixzz1tLgGK1nz
:lol: