• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Why

loomixguy

Well-known member
Would Ivanka Drumpf be hosting a $5200 per head fundraiser, in her Park Avenue, Manhattan, home, for Newark, NJ Mayor Cory Booker (D)?

Booker is running in a special race for a Senate seat in NJ that was vacated by the death of the previous Senator.

Her daddy is the Democrat lite nominee, and she's shilling for a Democrat 1.0 for the US Senate. I have a real big picture of Chelsea Clinton hosting a fundraiser for any Democrat lite. The nut doesn't fall far from the tree.
 

Mike

Well-known member
1- The Fundraiser was held in 2013. That was long before Trump had the intent to run for election.

2- Trump has long said he gave to both sides in elections that were meaningful to his business ventures. (Just as Goldman Sachs and other large businesses do.) Invanka was making sure Booker was in their pocket. Politics as usual.
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
So emulating or having anything to do with Goldman-Sachs is perfectly normal and acceptable......for both parties..........

Unless you're Mrs. Ted Cruz.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Except Ted Cruz tried to hide his association with G/S. He didn't list it on his FEC form. The rest have been up front.

See what I did there? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

Steve

Well-known member
Traveler said:
Why pass that off as a current event?


maybe because 2013 is not long ago and just proves the point MOST conservatives have said.. this family is not republicans, and never were until it was time to sabotage our party.

If Hillery became a republican in 2013 and ran would she get a single vote?
 

Mike

Well-known member
There are and have been several Democrats that converted to the Republican side. One of the most respected U.S. Senators from Alabama is a quick reference. In the past there was a faction of Democrats that were conservative on many issues. Some more conservative than some Republicans.
 

Brad S

Well-known member
Mike said:
There are and have been several Democrats that converted to the Republican side. One of the most respected U.S. Senators from Alabama is a quick reference. In the past there was a faction of Democrats that were conservative on many issues. Some more conservative than some Republicans.


Those Dixiecrats offer no cover to gun control and pro abortion trump. Dixiecrats don't roll with New York values. Even now, what's trump going to do? Trump claims to be going to make America great. Bs dumb Donald, America is great. It's a liberal approach to think the govt can or should make America great. All we need is fidelity to a great document, the constitution and the principles of limited government and individual liberty. If dumb Donald was a conservative that's what he'd be selling not that he's the perfect guy to control the levers of big government.
 

Brad S

Well-known member
Is that a serious question? First, I think you know Rudy isn't a Dixiecrat so your question is rhetorical where you (erroneously) think that's a zinger. All I can do is shake my head. That's a nice list of statists. Our problems are the overwhelming intrusions of an oversized government into the lives and liberties of individual citizens.

there are 2 mutually exclusive points of view. Some think freedom allows the greatness of the human spirit to prevail. Others like Hillary, whatever bush, trump, Rudy well they all think prosperity comes from the right manipulation of the levers of a necessarily large central government. Peter king? Really? Ruth Ginsberg doesn't think the U.S. Constitution is the greatest in the world - she doesn't value limited government and the individual empowered to make personal choices.

Yes - your list of New Yorkers are flawed with New York values.
 

Traveler

Well-known member
I see Trump attacking those who have already trampled the constitution.....Hillary, Obama, Ginsberg, etal, and intends to put conservative constitutionalists on the Supreme Court. You know the constitution means nothing to the Clintons and their minions, except something to subvert.

Some levers need to be pulled.
 

Brad S

Well-known member
Traveler said:
I see Trump attacking those who have already trampled the constitution.....Hillary, Obama, Ginsberg, etal, and intends to put conservative constitutionalists on the Supreme Court. You know the constitution means nothing to the Clintons and their minions, except something to subvert.

Some levers need to be pulled.


Wish it was only the Democrats ignoring the constitution - it's meant precious damn little to a bunch of republicans over the last century.

I'll be thrilled if trump clowns me. "At least he's not Hillary" is compelling but not complimentary.
 

Brad S

Well-known member
Mike said:
Is that a serious question?

Semi-serious. It was my round about way of seeing if you even know what a Dixiecrat is. Clearly you don't.


Have some pride And don't say stupid easily refuted things. Dixiecrat specifically refers to a states rights party of 60 years ago. I don't accept the tea party comparison that gets tossed about. Modern parlance loosely refers to southern democrats that tend to be conservative outside traditional bounds of the democrat party. The left compares the tea party to Dixiecrats because of the commonality of inconvenience. What is that 30 words to disprove a lie. About 18 more than deserving. Such is the nature of rediculous dishonest comments.

1) my previous post doesn't offer insight as to my understanding of the term Dixiecrat
2) clearly I know the definition of Dixiecrat and your comment to the contrary is A DAMN LIE (go figure, from a trump lemming)
 

Mike

Well-known member
When I alluded to Sen. Richard Shelby (R) AL, my point was that many Democrats have changed over to the Republican Party and have been loyal Conservatives/Republicans since. You brought up the term Dixiecrat. It was totally off topic.

Good to see you have studied about that movement and learned what it really was and when it took place. Hint: Much earlier than Shelby.
 
Top