A
Anonymous
Guest
Isn't that great? Harry Reid writes a letter to Rush and a charity gets $4million. Good for Reid. :lol:
Absolutely! Reids failed attempt to distort, discredit, and silence his opposition will be permanently documented.ff said:Isn't that great? Harry Reid writes a letter to Rush and a charity gets $4million. Good for Reid. :lol:
Reid did not do anything good, he LIED. So how is that good?Isn't that great? Harry Reid writes a letter to Rush and a charity gets $4million. Good for Reid
nonothing said:What is sad is that all of the press on this is not about the good that has come from it but every article has rush going on about the letter like he won something.....Why he has to make an issue out of this good deed is beyond me....He did a good thing,why not take the time to talk about the charity and less about this letter? I find that rush is using this as a way of twisting a knife rather than helping a charity. It comes across as he is just using this charity to stick it to someone who wronged him,rather than making simple donation IMHO......
What is this charity about,what will the money go to?and why not try to get more money by rallying the charities purpose and less about those who wrote the letter. Maybe if it was done with out the fanfare afterwards,it would seem more about helping others...Its a shame something good has to come with such disingenuous behavior..Again IMHO
aplusmnt said:nonothing said:What is sad is that all of the press on this is not about the good that has come from it but every article has rush going on about the letter like he won something.....Why he has to make an issue out of this good deed is beyond me....He did a good thing,why not take the time to talk about the charity and less about this letter? I find that rush is using this as a way of twisting a knife rather than helping a charity. It comes across as he is just using this charity to stick it to someone who wronged him,rather than making simple donation IMHO......
What is this charity about,what will the money go to?and why not try to get more money by rallying the charities purpose and less about those who wrote the letter. Maybe if it was done with out the fanfare afterwards,it would seem more about helping others...Its a shame something good has to come with such disingenuous behavior..Again IMHO
The reason is that the money for Charity is a small thing compared to the Freedom of speech issue that the letter was trying to hinder. One of the primary things our founding father gave their lives for was the freedom of speech. The democrats want to take that away with the fairness doctrine.
The Liberals control 90% of the media in the U.S. They own most all major newspapers, they control all but one news network. The only real voice the conservatives have is A.M. Talk radio and the Democrats want to silence that one venue.
A few million for charity is a drop in the bucket of good, Freedom of speech is the foundation of America!
aplusmnt said:nonothing said:What is sad is that all of the press on this is not about the good that has come from it but every article has rush going on about the letter like he won something.....Why he has to make an issue out of this good deed is beyond me....He did a good thing,why not take the time to talk about the charity and less about this letter? I find that rush is using this as a way of twisting a knife rather than helping a charity. It comes across as he is just using this charity to stick it to someone who wronged him,rather than making simple donation IMHO......
What is this charity about,what will the money go to?and why not try to get more money by rallying the charities purpose and less about those who wrote the letter. Maybe if it was done with out the fanfare afterwards,it would seem more about helping others...Its a shame something good has to come with such disingenuous behavior..Again IMHO
The reason is that the money for Charity is a small thing compared to the Freedom of speech issue that the letter was trying to hinder. One of the primary things our founding father gave their lives for was the freedom of speech. The democrats want to take that away with the fairness doctrine.
The Liberals control 90% of the media in the U.S. They own most all major newspapers, they control all but one news network. The only real voice the conservatives have is A.M. Talk radio and the Democrats want to silence that one venue.
A few million for charity is a drop in the bucket of good, Freedom of speech is the foundation of America!
nonothing said:aplusmnt said:nonothing said:What is sad is that all of the press on this is not about the good that has come from it but every article has rush going on about the letter like he won something.....Why he has to make an issue out of this good deed is beyond me....He did a good thing,why not take the time to talk about the charity and less about this letter? I find that rush is using this as a way of twisting a knife rather than helping a charity. It comes across as he is just using this charity to stick it to someone who wronged him,rather than making simple donation IMHO......
What is this charity about,what will the money go to?and why not try to get more money by rallying the charities purpose and less about those who wrote the letter. Maybe if it was done with out the fanfare afterwards,it would seem more about helping others...Its a shame something good has to come with such disingenuous behavior..Again IMHO
The reason is that the money for Charity is a small thing compared to the Freedom of speech issue that the letter was trying to hinder. One of the primary things our founding father gave their lives for was the freedom of speech. The democrats want to take that away with the fairness doctrine.
The Liberals control 90% of the media in the U.S. They own most all major newspapers, they control all but one news network. The only real voice the conservatives have is A.M. Talk radio and the Democrats want to silence that one venue.
A few million for charity is a drop in the bucket of good, Freedom of speech is the foundation of America!
I was under the impression this thread was about a letter to be sold to aid a charity....It was not about free speech.I am sure Rush has crossed lines a few times too....If his beef was about free speech then say that ..do not hide behind something by incorporating a charity to make your point...This should not of been this way.....I think it is in bad taste to use something like a charity to make a political stance on.....IMHO..Now this whole good deed,which was broached under the guise of giving,has now been sadly tainted.IMHO.....I do not like or dislike Rush,all he is,is a voice on the radio for people who can't make up their own minds listen too...He is not entertainment,just political dribble..I actually thought he was doing a good thing just because it was a good thing to do.....turns out he still talks about it on his show today.
A debate about whether to invade Iraq becomes a debate about whether Joe Wilson's undercover CIA wife hooked him up with an overseas junket. A debate on stem cell research becomes a debate about whether Michael J. Fox exaggerates his symptoms. A debate about the right to privacy becomes a debate about whether Terri Schivo's blinks were voluntary. A debate on Iraq policy becomes a debate about how mean people are to General Petraeus. A debate about health care becomes an investigation into the lifestyle of 12 year old Graeme Frost. A debate about climate change becomes a debate about how many compact fluorescent light bulbs Al Gore has in his house. A debate about the level of poverty in this country becomes a debate about how much money John Edwards spent on a haircut. A debate about who's qualified to be president becomes a debate about who does or does not wear a lapel pin.
Wake up and see that it was about "phony soldiers" that is unless your hatred for Bush blinds you from seeing the truth.Rush is using this letter and a charity to change the subject from him insulting soldiers in Iraq who disagree with the war.
Larrry said:Wake up and see that it was about "phony soldiers" that is unless your hatred for Bush blinds you from seeing the truth.Rush is using this letter and a charity to change the subject from him insulting soldiers in Iraq who disagree with the war.
Spin it all you want it was about phony soldiers, you know the ones that nail the left and had them left following like a puppy dog. (deja vu Rathergate)
The left was so enthralled with this phony soldiers message that they forgot to check if he was telling the truth.
nonothing said:aplusmnt said:nonothing said:What is sad is that all of the press on this is not about the good that has come from it but every article has rush going on about the letter like he won something.....Why he has to make an issue out of this good deed is beyond me....He did a good thing,why not take the time to talk about the charity and less about this letter? I find that rush is using this as a way of twisting a knife rather than helping a charity. It comes across as he is just using this charity to stick it to someone who wronged him,rather than making simple donation IMHO......
What is this charity about,what will the money go to?and why not try to get more money by rallying the charities purpose and less about those who wrote the letter. Maybe if it was done with out the fanfare afterwards,it would seem more about helping others...Its a shame something good has to come with such disingenuous behavior..Again IMHO
The reason is that the money for Charity is a small thing compared to the Freedom of speech issue that the letter was trying to hinder. One of the primary things our founding father gave their lives for was the freedom of speech. The democrats want to take that away with the fairness doctrine.
The Liberals control 90% of the media in the U.S. They own most all major newspapers, they control all but one news network. The only real voice the conservatives have is A.M. Talk radio and the Democrats want to silence that one venue.
A few million for charity is a drop in the bucket of good, Freedom of speech is the foundation of America!
I was under the impression this thread was about a letter to be sold to aid a charity....It was not about free speech.I am sure Rush has crossed lines a few times too....If his beef was about free speech then say that ..do not hide behind something by incorporating a charity to make your point...This should not of been this way.....I think it is in bad taste to use something like a charity to make a political stance on.....IMHO..Now this whole good deed,which was broached under the guise of giving,has now been sadly tainted.IMHO.....I do not like or dislike Rush,all he is,is a voice on the radio for people who can't make up their own minds listen too...He is not entertainment,just political dribble..I actually thought he was doing a good thing just because it was a good thing to do.....turns out he still talks about it on his show today.