Paul rejected the proposal for "[urging] the Administration to seriously consider multilateral or even unilateral intervention to stop genocide in Darfur should the UN Security Council fail to act." Paul argued the unrelatedness of the proposal to "the US national interest" or "the Constitutional function of [United States] military forces."
He then went on to question the very purpose of America's support for Israel, asking: "Is it really in the interest of the United States to guarantee the survival of any foreign country?"
In May 2011, Paul said he would not have ordered the raid that killed 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden, calling the operation "absolutely not necessary" [73]. Instead he would have done it differently, stating that America should have worked with the Pakistani Authorities who in the past had arrested Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and other terrorists who were then tried in court. Paul also stated that other alternatives were viable that were less of a violation of Pakistan's sovereignty, such as the original bombing of the compound that was planned.
MsSage said:the quote says interfere, or in other words meddle, which is NOT coming to the aid.
I dont think we should meddle in any other countries affairs.
I support wholely going to the aid when asked by a "friend"
So how do I answer the poll?
MsSage said:Thats NOT meddling and it the US handling its own business.