• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

WOW manic, obsessed, unprepared and clueless

Tam

Well-known member
A surprise message from our D.C. Insider reveals an Obama White House completely unprepared for the events in Egypt, and increasingly fearful of Obama’s chances for re-election in 2012.

First, I am so disappointed in the response by Obama White House to the crisis in Egypt. White House was caught completely off guard on this one despite indications they were informed of just such a scenario a number of times over the past year or so. They ignored the warnings. When the protests started did you notice the confused messaging from the administration? Hillary says one thing. Biden says another thing. Obama says basically nothing. These are the situations where an American president can either rise to the occasion and show strength and wisdom or where they appear weak and uncertain. I don’t need to explain to you what our current president did. If this goes badly, and it appears it very well could, American interests in the region will be placed in very grave danger. The parallels to Carter are stunning. Oh how I miss the days when the party was led by the likes of Scoop. I fear the mishandling of the Egypt situation is going to result in a total chaos in that country soon.

Obama is clueless. Totally clueless. I am not talking a little out of step here. I am talking the man has no idea what is going on around him. This is not coming from me. I am relaying it from some still around him on a regular basis. These people are getting increasingly concerned over just how “out of it”, that is the phrase repeated to me, Obama has become. His primary focus is now getting elected in ‘12. Everything else has been given over to Jarrett and her group. Everything. The president has no interest in policy. None. No interest in working legislation. None. No interest in forging a specific agenda. None. He is being told what he needs to say and that is it. That is the extent of his interest. “Just make it look good.” Exact words right there. President Obama is obsessed 24/7 with just “looking good”. If something goes well, he gets happy and outgoing. If something makes him look badly, he lashes out and pouts. The man is bouncing off both of those extremes even more now than he used to and it appears to be getting worse and worse. The word “manic” is being used more and more regarding his moods these days.

FYI there was a closed door meeting recently under the guise of discussions on Egypt. That meeting did not involve Egypt much if at all. This information is relayed second hand but I believe it to be completely reliable. Source told that meeting was run by Jarrett from start to end. Obama said very little. Asked no questions. The primary focus was how to protect Obamacare so it was not a “liability” in 2012 campaign. White House already spending significant time/resources preparing legal argument for the Supreme Court case that is coming. Second focus was apparently “birther” related. Jarrett expressed concern over possible newly passed eligibility requirements in states. If only one or two states clarify eligibility in order to run for office, White House will simply use those states as examples of “anti-Obama racism”. They would likely not win the electorals in those states regardless, but could use the scenario to gain sympathy and support over the challenge from other moderate states. This is the tactic Jarrett and crew have prepared. She is worried though that if more than one or two states challenge the president’s eligibility, the issue would turn against them. Measures are being taken to make certain that does not happen. What those measures are, I don’t know at this point. Oh, and while discussion over eligibility was underway, Obama sat motionless. He said nothing. That strikes me as pretty damn odd don’t you think? People are discussing whether or not you are actually eligible to run for re-election in 2012 and you don’t say a word on the subject? “He just sat there with a weird little smile and didn’t say anything.” Go ahead and print that quote word for word. Others are now willing to let their observations be more known. Concern for the country is now winning over concern for their own political interests. Finally.

Read more: http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/white-house-insider-obama-is-clueless-totally-clueless/#ixzz1Faf850s0

Plans are in the works to see to it that Obama will be on all State 2012 ballots and you can bet the Corrupt Chicago Machine will be using the RACE CARD at every turn. I would not put it passed Obama to use Federal funding to states to stop states from requesting his Birth certificate. This should be interesting but some how i doubt surprising :wink:
 

Texan

Well-known member
I'm sad to say that I don't have any trouble believing every word of this. It's becoming more clear to me all of the time that we are absolutely leaderless.

But...maybe I'm wrong. Are there any rebuttals from the Obama supporters?
 

Tam

Well-known member
They do seem to be fewer and further between the longer he is in the Oval Office doesn't it. :wink:

It will be interesting to see if he will draw the same adoring fans club he so enjoyed the first time around now that he has to run on an actual record. .

If The Republican need some hard hitting campaign ads maybe these will work


WE WON, WE, WRITE THE BILLS!!!
Job Creation = 10% unemployment
Health Care Reform = Unconstitutional
Fiscal Responsibility = Skyrocketing Debt
Bipartisanship = One Party rule
Earmark Reform = 9000 in one bill alone
Foreign Policy = apology tour
Energy Independence = Drilling moratoriums
Transparency = you have to pass it to know what's in it
WHAT WILL ANOTHER FOUR YEARS BRING?

The President of the United States of America should demand respect and bow to nobody
With pictures of Obama bowing and embarrassing the US


Judge him by the company he keeps
with pictures of his tax cheaters, Union Bosses, and his Radical Czars

They promised to serve all Americans
Then refresh people about all the names the Dems have used against Tea Partiers.


He calls for civility
Then show pictures of the WI. Union Protesters signs,
his Campaign organizing website supporting an illegal strike
all while playing the SEIU new theme song. "Take The Bast*rds Down"

Is this the best Obama can do on Fiscal Responsibility
And show pictures of the Obama's WH Parties and expensive Vacations.

"The White have not suffered enough to expect protection under Obama Law."
with a picture of the Black Panthers with "DOJ charges dropped"

Let him answer to his true record of broken promises, failed foreign policy, economic disaster, party politics, his Racist tax cheating Administration, embarrassing Protocol gaffes and his lavish lifestyle while taxpayers are suffering.

Let the States use their legislative powers to make him prove he is qualified to run. The Republicans need to stick to his RECORD to destroy his chances of re-election.
 

Tam

Well-known member
Not that I care what Matt Damon thinks but I'm sure the Obama machine is not going to like hearing this considering the money Hollywood spent on getting him elected.

Obama Supporter Matt Damon Admits: I’m No Longer a Fan
Posted on March 3, 2011 at 2:54pm by Jonathon M. Seidl Print » Email » In an interview set to air tonight on CNN, Obama supporter and actor Matt Damon admitted he has had a change of heart when it comes to the president. According to Damon, Obama hasn’t come through on his promises.

Piers Morgan pointedly asked Damon, who campaigned for Obama in 2008, if Damon was happy with Obama and still a fan. Damon responded, “No. No. I really think he misinterpreted his mandate.” He went on to quote a friend who said, “I no longer hope for audacity. ”

The liberal Left in Hollywood are jumping ship so it will not be long before The Dems toss Obama under the bus. Odds are his BC will magically appear. :wink:
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
Tam said:
Not that I care what Matt Damon thinks but I'm sure the Obama machine is not going to like hearing this considering the money Hollywood spent on getting him elected.

Obama Supporter Matt Damon Admits: I’m No Longer a Fan
Posted on March 3, 2011 at 2:54pm by Jonathon M. Seidl Print » Email » In an interview set to air tonight on CNN, Obama supporter and actor Matt Damon admitted he has had a change of heart when it comes to the president. According to Damon, Obama hasn’t come through on his promises.

Piers Morgan pointedly asked Damon, who campaigned for Obama in 2008, if Damon was happy with Obama and still a fan. Damon responded, “No. No. I really think he misinterpreted his mandate.” He went on to quote a friend who said, “I no longer hope for audacity. ”

The liberal Left in Hollywood are jumping ship so it will not be long before The Dems toss Obama under the bus. Odds are his BC will magically appear. :wink:

You can bet the suddenly silent (except on Ranch Talk) Old Pendejo would support TWAP even if Jesus Christ himself was running against him. There are still plenty of the Not-Quite-Right in the head who support TWAP, and don't forget the MILLIONS and MILLIONS of welfare recipients coast to coast who will proudly cast their vote for him....... :roll:
 

Lonecowboy

Well-known member
like rats from a sinking ship:


Reporting From Helena, Mont. — The Rocky Mountain West, which helped give Democrats the White House and control of the U.S. Senate, has emerged as a key 2012 battleground as President Obama works to win back independents and others disaffected by the last two years of high unemployment, soaring deficits and expansive government growth.

Obama achieved a breakthrough in 2008, carrying Nevada, Colorado and New Mexico and coming close to winning Montana, a state Democrats lost overwhelmingly in the two previous presidential campaigns.

Since then, he has worked to solidify his support, appointing Westerners to important positions such as Interior secretary, and avoiding issues such as gun control and mining reform that had hurt previous Democrats. Even so, Obama's approval ratings have fallen across the region.That has not only complicated the president's reelection effort, but threatens fellow Democrats like Montana Sen. Jon Tester, who will likely share the ballot in 2012 and face one of the toughest reelection fights in the country. It was Tester's narrow 2006 victory that helped Democrats seize control of the Senate.His Republican opponent, Rep. Denny Rehberg, is now more likely to utter Obama's name — and not in a good way — than the Democratic senator, which suggests how much the ground has shifted since the last presidential race. Asked whether he would stand alongside Obama if he campaigned in Montana, as he did in 2008, Tester suggested not."I'll stand with [Brian] Schweitzer. I'll stand with Max [Baucus]," Tester said of the state's Democratic governor and senior U.S. senator. He had just finished a day of events that included visits to two union halls, a radio call-in show, a business round table at the Chamber of Commerce and a speech to a joint session of the Legislature.

"I'll stand with people that I addressed today, on either side of the aisle, if they want to stand with me," Tester said. "That's who I look to."

the coattails of an empty suit aren't much to ride on are they?
 

Tam

Well-known member
Mike said:
I wonder how Peggy feels?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI

visions of free Mortgages and gas for Peggy on election night but what did he deliver, a new reality of hotdogs and beans for middle class households.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zK2cM6NhT0
 

Tam

Well-known member
Lonecowboy said:
like rats from a sinking ship:


Reporting From Helena, Mont. — The Rocky Mountain West, which helped give Democrats the White House and control of the U.S. Senate, has emerged as a key 2012 battleground as President Obama works to win back independents and others disaffected by the last two years of high unemployment, soaring deficits and expansive government growth.

Obama achieved a breakthrough in 2008, carrying Nevada, Colorado and New Mexico and coming close to winning Montana, a state Democrats lost overwhelmingly in the two previous presidential campaigns.

Since then, he has worked to solidify his support, appointing Westerners to important positions such as Interior secretary, and avoiding issues such as gun control and mining reform that had hurt previous Democrats. Even so, Obama's approval ratings have fallen across the region.That has not only complicated the president's reelection effort, but threatens fellow Democrats like Montana Sen. Jon Tester, who will likely share the ballot in 2012 and face one of the toughest reelection fights in the country. It was Tester's narrow 2006 victory that helped Democrats seize control of the Senate.His Republican opponent, Rep. Denny Rehberg, is now more likely to utter Obama's name — and not in a good way — than the Democratic senator, which suggests how much the ground has shifted since the last presidential race. Asked whether he would stand alongside Obama if he campaigned in Montana, as he did in 2008, Tester suggested not."I'll stand with [Brian] Schweitzer. I'll stand with Max [Baucus]," Tester said of the state's Democratic governor and senior U.S. senator. He had just finished a day of events that included visits to two union halls, a radio call-in show, a business round table at the Chamber of Commerce and a speech to a joint session of the Legislature.

"I'll stand with people that I addressed today, on either side of the aisle, if they want to stand with me," Tester said. "That's who I look to."

the coattails of an empty suit aren't much to ride on are they?

Can you blame Tester for not wanting Obama on the campaign trail, look at his record for other Democrats in the by-elections and 2010 elections. He was a cinder block tied to the feet of Democrats that were in the deep end of the cesspool struggling to stay afloat.

The bad thing for Tester is it doesn't matter who is standing beside him on the campaign trail in Montana because everyone knows once he is back in Washington it is back to Democrats and a government takeover of American lives. The only way to stop that is by replacing him with a TRUE CONSERVATIVE Candidate.
 

Lonecowboy

Well-known member
Do you think this photo will be used in the upcoming election?


tester-obama.png






Ohhhhh Jooon!- - OOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHH BAAAAAAARRRRYYYYY!

Their the barry best of friends!
 

Tam

Well-known member
This picture should be on Republican bill boards, ads and flyers during the election. With the words "WILL HE STAND UP FOR YOU" or "WHO IS FIGHTING FOR MONTANA"

Tie Tester to Obama and his policies at every turn with PICTURES but when out speaking the Repubilcans need to keep it clean by sticking to the issues. When mud starts to fly stay above it and use no personal attacks let the pictures tell the story of his record in DC. :wink:
 

Lonecowboy

Well-known member
I personally think it was photo-shopped! :shock:

In what looks to be a big crap eatin grin, tester was actually grimacing under the heavy handed rule of barry o'soteros rule!


and what is made to look like tester patting barry o on the back was actually and action shot of his hand on the way up to strike back for Liberty!

This picture is pure proof of the radical right trying desperatly to tie tester to barry o. :D
 

Silver

Well-known member
ooops.... read the thread title and assumed it was about Sarah Palin :oops:
The future looks bright all the way around down there :lol: Maybe Donald Trump will save the future :D
 

Silver

Well-known member
Faster horses said:
I'm of the opinion that Sarah could easily hold her own against
Tester, Schweitzer and Baucus ALL AT THE SAME TIME.

Well there's quite a group. Deciding between them would be like deciding if you should amputate your leg above the knee or just below :lol:
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Silver said:
Faster horses said:
I'm of the opinion that Sarah could easily hold her own against
Tester, Schweitzer and Baucus ALL AT THE SAME TIME.

Well there's quite a group. Deciding between them would be like deciding if you should amputate your leg above the knee or just below :lol:
In that case maybe at the neck!!!!!! :D :D

Of course if you are a Sarah hater like the liberal crowd seem to be, you cannot see that she is a light at the end of a tunnel as opposed to the block wall that we have in office now, that in itself is evident in Silvers post where he tries to demean her!!!!

welcome to kolo=jingos world of hate women silver :wink: :wink:
 

Silver

Well-known member
hopalong said:
Silver said:
Faster horses said:
I'm of the opinion that Sarah could easily hold her own against
Tester, Schweitzer and Baucus ALL AT THE SAME TIME.

Well there's quite a group. Deciding between them would be like deciding if you should amputate your leg above the knee or just below :lol:
In that case maybe at the neck!!!!!! :D :D

Of course if you are a Sarah hater like the liberal crowd seem to be, you cannot see that she is a light at the end of a tunnel as opposed to the block wall that we have in office now, that in itself is evident in Silvers post where he tries to demean her!!!!

welcome to kolo=jingos world of hate women silver :wink: :wink:

You think I demeaned her because she's a woman? How very sexist of you.
It's only my humble opinion but there is a former speaker and R. whip that would make a fine leader / president and seems to be getting overlooked in here. However, I don't have a dog in this fight so if you want Mrs. Palin then fill your boots. I will try not to show my sympathetic embarrassment when visiting with my American friends :wink:
 

TSR

Well-known member
Silver said:
hopalong said:
Silver said:
Well there's quite a group. Deciding between them would be like deciding if you should amputate your leg above the knee or just below :lol:
In that case maybe at the neck!!!!!! :D :D

Of course if you are a Sarah hater like the liberal crowd seem to be, you cannot see that she is a light at the end of a tunnel as opposed to the block wall that we have in office now, that in itself is evident in Silvers post where he tries to demean her!!!!

welcome to kolo=jingos world of hate women silver :wink: :wink:

You think I demeaned her because she's a woman? How very sexist of you.
It's only my humble opinion but there is a former speaker and R. whip that would make a fine leader / president and seems to be getting overlooked in here. However, I don't have a dog in this fight so if you want Mrs. Palin then fill your boots. I will try not to show my sympathetic embarrassment when visiting with my American friends :wink:

Silver, darn it, your intelligence is showing. :wink: :)
 

Tam

Well-known member
Silver said:
hopalong said:
Silver said:
Well there's quite a group. Deciding between them would be like deciding if you should amputate your leg above the knee or just below :lol:
In that case maybe at the neck!!!!!! :D :D

Of course if you are a Sarah hater like the liberal crowd seem to be, you cannot see that she is a light at the end of a tunnel as opposed to the block wall that we have in office now, that in itself is evident in Silvers post where he tries to demean her!!!!

welcome to kolo=jingos world of hate women silver :wink: :wink:

You think I demeaned her because she's a woman? How very sexist of you.
It's only my humble opinion but there is a former speaker and R. whip that would make a fine leader / president and seems to be getting overlooked in here. However, I don't have a dog in this fight so if you want Mrs. Palin then fill your boots. I will try not to show my sympathetic embarrassment when visiting with my American friends :wink:

Don't worry Silver chances are your American friends are hiding their embarrassment over Obama or didn't you hear even the Far left of Hollywood that campaigned for him are jumping off the Big O's bandwagon due to disappointment. :wink:
 
Top