• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

WOW Obama could not be happier

Tam

Well-known member
With the media dedicating every minute of their broadcast to the Zimmerman verdict nobody is reporting on the testimony from Victoria Nuland and the edited Benghazi talking points. Has anyone heard anything more about why the Obama Administration lied about HEAVILY EDITING the CIA talking points and WHO ALL WAS INVOVLED?
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Tam said:
With the media dedicating every minute of their broadcast to the Zimmerman verdict nobody is reporting on the testimony from Victoria Nuland and the edited Benghazi talking points. Has anyone heard anything more about why the Obama Administration lied about HEAVILY EDITING the CIA talking points and WHO ALL WAS INVOVLED?

Well, to be fair, a reliable source has told me that Bush personally edited NSA reports that were given to Congress and the MSM decided not to cover the story. I know it's true because he saw it on C-Span and he NEVER lies or even stretches the truth. :roll:
 

Tam

Well-known member
I would think by now the Congress would just EXPECT anyone from this Administration is LYING and would send out investigators to dig up everything they can on every word these people so easily spew as the truth. Past SWORN TESTIMONY FROM THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION has proven they can't be trusted on any issue.

What I don't understand is why with so much PROVEN LYING going on is nobody being charges or at least being FIRED. Seems they all get promoted to a higher tax payer funded office that doesn't need Congressional approval to reward them for their loyalty to Obama and DISLOYALTY TO THE US. Just once I would like to see ISSA toss one of these liars in prison for a VERY LONG TIME and make an example out of them but nope they keep on lying and he keeps wasting money investigating when he has no intention of making them PAY FOR THEIR LYING. :roll:
 

Steve

Well-known member
Nuland faced criticism from Republican lawmakers for her behind-the-scenes efforts to erase al Qaeda references from the White House talking points that were issued in the wake of the attacks.

Some of her fiercest critics alleged a cover-up, a charge Nuland vehemently denied and defended herself against during the hearings.

Nuland made it clear that she was not in a policy position at the time and was chiefly concerned with keeping the administration’s public remarks consistent.

Ms. Nuland said that she had a communications role at the State Department and not a policy job, explaining that she did not read intelligence reports because it would have been too difficult to keep that information separate.

Nuland explained that she was instructed by her superiors to be vague about what precisely had taken place.
http://freebeacon.com/victoria-nuland-questioned-about-benghazi-attack-talking-points/

“We can’t get to the truth,” Mr. Paul said. “That’s the problem with running secret government and running secret wars. We can’t have oversight because we don’t have any information.

in other words.. she didn't admit to anything nor offer anything beyond the official narrative...
 

Tam

Well-known member
Steve said:
Nuland faced criticism from Republican lawmakers for her behind-the-scenes efforts to erase al Qaeda references from the White House talking points that were issued in the wake of the attacks.

Some of her fiercest critics alleged a cover-up, a charge Nuland vehemently denied and defended herself against during the hearings.

Nuland made it clear that she was not in a policy position at the time and was chiefly concerned with keeping the administration’s public remarks consistent.

Ms. Nuland said that she had a communications role at the State Department and not a policy job, explaining that she did not read intelligence reports because it would have been too difficult to keep that information separate.

Nuland explained that she was instructed by her superiors to be vague about what precisely had taken place.
http://freebeacon.com/victoria-nuland-questioned-about-benghazi-attack-talking-points/

“We can’t get to the truth,” Mr. Paul said. “That’s the problem with running secret government and running secret wars. We can’t have oversight because we don’t have any information.

in other words.. she didn't admit to anything nor offer anything beyond the official narrative...

Her email telling those in charge of the edits that they didn't want to give the Republicans anything to use against the DOS was proof they were WITHHOLDING the truth in those lying talking points. The fact it was a TERRORIST ATTACK and it was known within minutes of the attack starting also proves THEY LIED AND SHE KNEW THEY WERE LYING. :x

BTW it was her COMMUNICATION Department that COMMUNICATED A LIE and she knew it was a lie or she would not have told the CIA to CHANGE a TERRORIST ATTACK into a protest over a video to protect her boss HILLARY for the criticism that she so well deserved.
 
Top