• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Wow, talk about fearmongering from the MSM

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
AMAZING Keith Olbermann Special Comment On Supreme Court Ruling - Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72ZwG5vQ_04

Part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeOwRy9_xsM

Keith is talking about a revolution, "but a revolution against who, the corporations make the guns and bullets"

These libs sure are scaremongers. :roll: :roll:
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
The truth hurts.

Give them the cold hearted facts and they scatter like a covey of quail.

If you start talking rhetoric they begin to converge again. It makes absolutely no sense at all.

The only thing I can conclude is that they are not prepared to do anything and therefore want to ignore the facts.

Most of them scattered from here as well.
 

Tam

Well-known member
Barack Obama (D)
Top Contributors
This table lists the top donors to this candidate in the 2008 election cycle. The organizations themselves did not donate , rather the money came from the organization's PAC, its individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.

Because of contribution limits, organizations that bundle together many individual contributions are often among the top donors to presidential candidates. These contributions can come from the organization's members or employees (and their families). The organization may support one candidate, or hedge its bets by supporting multiple candidates. Groups with national networks of donors - like EMILY's List and Club for Growth - make for particularly big bundlers.

University of California $1,591,395
Goldman Sachs $994,795
Harvard University $854,747
Microsoft Corp $833,617
Google Inc $803,436
Citigroup Inc $701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
Time Warner $590,084
Sidley Austin LLP $588,598
Stanford University $586,557
National Amusements Inc $551,683
UBS AG $543,219
Wilmerhale Llp $542,618
Skadden, Arps et al $530,839
IBM Corp $528,822
Columbia University $528,302
Morgan Stanley $514,881
General Electric $499,130
US Government $494,820
Latham & Watkins $493,835

BIG DEAL it was being done anyway, now the FAT CATS, as Obama calls them, can write one check instead of paying their employees to fake contributions. :wink:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Funny about something missing on the list. SEIU SPENT 62 MILLION GETTING obamah ELECTED. 62 million ofits members money. What did they hope to get or what were they promised in return for this buying of the presidency?
 

Steve

Well-known member
While I hold "freedom of Speech" as a right each person has...

I disagree on corporations, unions and groups having that same right..

they do not have the right to vote.

and should not have to right to influence elections...

if an individual wants to speak, donate then let them do so in their name and with their voice... and there should be no limit on their contributions.
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
Yes and no. I am so passionate about some issues that I have joined pacs that support my passion. If the candidate wants to sit and talk to me at a pac meeting - all the better.

It works better at the state level. I don't depend on a liberal media reporter. When someone like Obama said, "We're looking in to this issue but....." I could immediately stop him and ask him, "Do you mean you have not looked into it yet?" NOT ONCE did this happen during all the debate hoopla last year.

It is my nickels to spend. I can choose to leave the pac at any time and I can choose to change my vote too. But individually, I am not afforded the same opportunities.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
backhoeboogie said:
Yes and no. I am so passionate about some issues that I have joined pacs that support my passion. If the candidate wants to sit and talk to me at a pac meeting - all the better.

It works better at the state level. I don't depend on a liberal media reporter. When someone like Obama said, "We're looking in to this issue but....." I could immediately stop him and ask him, "Do you mean you have not looked into it yet?" NOT ONCE did this happen during all the debate hoopla last year.

It is my nickels to spend. I can choose to leave the pac at any time and I can choose to change my vote too. But individually, I am not afforded the same opportunities.
Sure you can backhoe you just have to have enough cash to make your voice heard. Buy you some time on the radio and TV and open you a website and go for it. You will have to get your word out further than the policital bull session. though.
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
hurleyjd said:
backhoeboogie said:
Yes and no. I am so passionate about some issues that I have joined pacs that support my passion. If the candidate wants to sit and talk to me at a pac meeting - all the better.

It works better at the state level. I don't depend on a liberal media reporter. When someone like Obama said, "We're looking in to this issue but....." I could immediately stop him and ask him, "Do you mean you have not looked into it yet?" NOT ONCE did this happen during all the debate hoopla last year.

It is my nickels to spend. I can choose to leave the pac at any time and I can choose to change my vote too. But individually, I am not afforded the same opportunities.
Sure you can backhoe you just have to have enough cash to make your voice heard. Buy you some time on the radio and TV and open you a website and go for it. You will have to get your word out further than the policital bull session. though.

Someone else already thought of your plan. Tune in to talk radio and take a listen. Hannity would be a case in point. I don't do the Rush show but he's another. The pacs I'm referring to are on the local and state level but you might have missed that part.
 
Top