Twister Frost said:
Oldtimer said:
BUT the real big difference is showing in the Senate polling where now with the current polling 53 Democrats would win the Senate with 46 Republicans and 1 still considered a tie....
And President Obama still wouldn't be able to get a darn thing done---he had that chance once. If I was a betting man, I'd say these numbers look like they are getting ready to put in a Republican president who has to work with a Democrat majority---
As to what Romney has said on tape, can you really argue against that---those who have been living off the government are not going to vote for someone who wants them to get off their duffs and be a productive member of society. You can add in the vets/elderly all you want, but I'm of the firm belief (as are most conscientious Americans) that those people have already paid their way; thus, I think Romney was talking about those who have the ability but are too darn lazy to try. We are on the brink of turning into a free-loading society, and somebody has to have the guts to call a spade a spade---Romney did. Those against him can twist and turn this all they want---the truth hurts. I would rather cast my vote for someone who is willing to tell the truth than for someone who is too afraid to tell the truth---on any level.
Oldtimer would rather vote for and defend somebody that can't admit a TERRORIST ATTACK is a TERRORIST ATTACK as it might hurt his chance at re-election.
Oldtimer would rather vote for and defend a guy that would rather attend a fund raiser than attend National Security Briefings the morning after a US Ambassador is killed.
Oldtimer would rather voter for and defend a guy that snubs allies while kissing up to the Muslim Brotherhood and Foreign Dictators.
Oldtimer would rather vote for and defend someone that continuely apologizes for the Constitutionally given rights to Freedom of Speech instead of telling the attackers what is going to happen if they don't clean up their act and live up to the claims of being a tolerant religion.
Oldtimer would rather vote for and defend a guy that appoints tax cheats and liars to his Administration while claiming he has implimented the highest ethics rules in history.
Oldtimer would rather vote for and defend a guy that claims he is going to be the most TRANSPARENT President in history while he seals all of his records and refuses to open them even when he is sued to turn them over.
Yes Oldtimer would rather vote for and defend Obama than admit he is a koolaid drinking fool that made a BIG AZZ MISTAKE IN 2008 when he voted for an incompetent junior senator to the most powerful office in the world that has failed in foreign and domestic affairs and has risked the lives of thousands of Americans to feed his ego due to the guys skin color.
BTW If a little seen video caused the mess in the Middle East like Obama wants everyone to believe then what is Obama spiking the ball feature MOVIE about Osama's death going to do and DOES HE CARE HOW MANY MORE AMBASSEDORS AND US SOLDIERS WILL LOSE THEIR LIVES AS LONG AS HIS EGO GETS FED?
