• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

you really can't make this stuff up...

Steve

Well-known member
this guy actually had the gall to say this... or should I ask,.. can anyone really be this stupid?

Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA) complains to FBI about "racism" of ad depicting Most Wanted Terrorists, because they're all Muslims

“FBI Most Wanted Terrorists”…30 Muslims and 2 Progressive Liberals. NO Right-Wing Patriots.

one of the two progressives had tried to get an injunction to get her trial delayed..

Shakur again attempted to remove the trial to federal court. The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denied the petition and also denied Shakur an injunction against the holding of trial proceedings on Fridays (the Black Muslim Sabbath)

because she was a muslim...

now there is one... Daniel Andreas San Diego a far left extremist who blew up a few buildings.. but is not accused of murdering anyone... yet)

so how is listing the top thirty racist?

cause a far left liberals says so...
U.S. Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Seattle, says so.

In a letter to the FBI requesting they pull the campaign from Seattle buses, McDermott sounds off on what he says is “offensive to Muslims and ethnic minorities” and “encourages racial and religious profiling.”

The ad shows sixteen faces of wanted terrorists, all of whom appear to be from predominantly Muslim regions. McDermott calls foul, writing that the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists list includes people of other races and “associations with other religions and causes.”

“But their faces are missing from this campaign,” he writes.

I would say add the tree hugger to the other 31 and call it a fair day in America.. but I doubt that would make senator lefty feel any better..

and I doubt he would find humor in some of the comments..
Hey, if the shoe bomb fits, wear it.. The premier terrorist threat in the world today is from the Muslim world.



why are liberals such male donkeys ?

if only they would fully understand how well their party mascot so eloquently fits them at times..
 

cowman52

Well-known member
There was a news blurb that to describe a suspect as black, white, or Hispanic was too far out. 30 yr old man wearing a tee shirt was as far as they wanted tit to go.
 

Steve

Well-known member
cowman52 said:
There was a news blurb that to describe a suspect as black, white, or Hispanic was too far out. 30 yr old man wearing a tee shirt was as far as they wanted tit to go.

it really seems to stupid to believe they are serious when you first read this crap...

.. but they actually want it to be a law in liberal lands.. :shock:
NYC Council Proposes Bill Where You Can't Describe Crime Suspects By Race, Age, Or Gender

Mayor Michael Bloomberg blasted the two City Council bills that he said would undermine public safety, including one measure that would prevent the NYPD from using information such as race, gender and age in its description of subjects. He mocked the legislation

"So think about this: If an officer is told by a witness that a twenty-something white man wearing a blue windbreaker was seen shooting a gun, the officer can only use the color of the windbreaker as a lead," he said. "And the officer would have to stop 80-year old black women if they are wearing blue windbreakers.

Even more absurd: if they stop someone who perfectly fits the description provided -- a twenty-something white man wearing a blue windbreaker -- and that person turns out not to be the shooter, that person can sue the NYPD. "If the legislation, intended to stop racial profiling, passes, police offers would face the constant threat of going to trial for doing their jobs, he said.

this bill is being proposed because black people feel they're being racially profiled despite statistically committing the most inner-city crime

If anything this bill leads to more stereotyping because officers will have to rely on their inner racism to stop crime.

as if that isn't dumb enough... it is actually worse...

The forbidden descriptors include race, color, ethnicity, religion, national origin, age, sex, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, immigration or citizenship status, disability (including HIV status) or occupation.

Williams and fellow Brooklyn Democrat Brad Lander, a co-sponsor of the proposal, say it would only expand the city’s existing racial-profiling law by adding other demographic groups that should be protected, such as the homeless and gay people.

“Officer, I was just robbed by a white man who walked with a limp and was about 5-foot-5.”

_DLK5608a032346--525x415.jpg


“Sorry, ma’am, I can’t look for a disabled 5' 5" white guy, but I will put out an APB on a robber.”

The ad warns that if cops transmit a description of a suspect that goes beyond the color of his or her clothing, they could be sued for racial profiling if the proposal becomes law.

later the officer is fired.. .for mistakenly referring to the victim as ma'am.. clearly a derogatory comment intended to focus on her gender..


and the idiots supporting this law
DRUM leader, Naz Ali, spoke at the rally on behalf of DRUM and MACLC (Muslim American Civil Liberties Coalition), and after the rally, several DRUM leaders joined CPR in lobbying their City Council members to sign on to the bills.
http://www.drumnyc.org/s27-rally-for-nypd-accountability-and-community-safety-act/

http://www.drumnyc.org/about-us/

from now on dummy is spelled drumnyc :shock:

well time to stick a fork in NYC cause it is done...

recent New York laws have made the average law abiding citizen a criminal..
 

Tam

Well-known member
Whitewing said:
If my memory serves me correctly, besides being stupid, Congressman McDermott is also an asshole.

NO, you don't say, really. :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

Tam

Well-known member
Steve said:
cowman52 said:
There was a news blurb that to describe a suspect as black, white, or Hispanic was too far out. 30 yr old man wearing a tee shirt was as far as they wanted tit to go.

it really seems to stupid to believe they are serious when you first read this crap...

.. but they actually want it to be a law in liberal lands.. :shock:
NYC Council Proposes Bill Where You Can't Describe Crime Suspects By Race, Age, Or Gender

Mayor Michael Bloomberg blasted the two City Council bills that he said would undermine public safety, including one measure that would prevent the NYPD from using information such as race, gender and age in its description of subjects. He mocked the legislation

"So think about this: If an officer is told by a witness that a twenty-something white man wearing a blue windbreaker was seen shooting a gun, the officer can only use the color of the windbreaker as a lead," he said. "And the officer would have to stop 80-year old black women if they are wearing blue windbreakers.

Even more absurd: if they stop someone who perfectly fits the description provided -- a twenty-something white man wearing a blue windbreaker -- and that person turns out not to be the shooter, that person can sue the NYPD. "If the legislation, intended to stop racial profiling, passes, police offers would face the constant threat of going to trial for doing their jobs, he said.

this bill is being proposed because black people feel they're being racially profiled despite statistically committing the most inner-city crime

If anything this bill leads to more stereotyping because officers will have to rely on their inner racism to stop crime.

as if that isn't dumb enough... it is actually worse...

The forbidden descriptors include race, color, ethnicity, religion, national origin, age, sex, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, immigration or citizenship status, disability (including HIV status) or occupation.

Williams and fellow Brooklyn Democrat Brad Lander, a co-sponsor of the proposal, say it would only expand the city’s existing racial-profiling law by adding other demographic groups that should be protected, such as the homeless and gay people.

“Officer, I was just robbed by a white man who walked with a limp and was about 5-foot-5.”

_DLK5608a032346--525x415.jpg


“Sorry, ma’am, I can’t look for a disabled 5' 5" white guy, but I will put out an APB on a robber.”

The ad warns that if cops transmit a description of a suspect that goes beyond the color of his or her clothing, they could be sued for racial profiling if the proposal becomes law.

later the officer is fired.. .for mistakenly referring to the victim as ma'am.. clearly a derogatory comment intended to focus on her gender..


and the idiots supporting this law
DRUM leader, Naz Ali, spoke at the rally on behalf of DRUM and MACLC (Muslim American Civil Liberties Coalition), and after the rally, several DRUM leaders joined CPR in lobbying their City Council members to sign on to the bills.
http://www.drumnyc.org/s27-rally-for-nypd-accountability-and-community-safety-act/

http://www.drumnyc.org/about-us/

from now on dummy is spelled drumnyc :shock:

well time to stick a fork in NYC cause it is done...

recent New York laws have made the average law abiding citizen a criminal..

They have always said Lady Justice is blind in the US so I guess the council members are wanting the police to be too. :roll:
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
It would be racial profiling and less efficient, if you were looking for a white murderer, in a white sedan, and NOT stop all the black people in black SUVs.
 

Soapweed

Well-known member
It is probably even discriminating to say if the suspect is male or female, or blonde, brunette, or red-headed. :roll: Liberals have a way of continually lowering the bar for accepted stupidity. :roll: :roll:
 
Top